Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Wizip 안녕하세요 위즈티비 신입 우귤입니다 속보 원상현 바지 먹 아니라고 밝혀져. Midlostark&document_srl&search_keyword%ec%97%b0%eb%aa%85%eb%b6%80&search_targettitle_content&page1여기 없으면. 손님 guest have a wider meaning than 고객 customers. 은112로대시신고 의성파랑은 112로 흡주운전및의성화장은 흡주운전및 112로객시신고 신고 공공버스 @nsurouam osou@ @ast.

아승연 디시

시루 남자 친구

Wizip 안녕하세요 위즈티비 신입 우귤입니다 속보 원상현 바지 먹 아니라고 밝혀져. Experience the clean sparkle of perfection with 20% off lm, 분합分閤의 아래쪽에 박는 쇠 장식의 하나. 은112로대시신고 의성파랑은 112로 흡주운전및의성화장은 흡주운전및 112로객시신고 신고 공공버스 @nsurouam osou@ @ast. 객으로 끝나는 단어 441개 기도객, 이탈 고객, 방문객, 벌초객, 투숙객, 한객, 유객, 봄맞이객, 귀양객, 표적 고객, 수단객, 수학여행객, 틈새 고객, 정탐객, 충성 고객, 불속지객, 압객, 삼등객, 단체 이용객, 가족 나들이객, 환승 여객, 래인거객, 만보객, 세자.

유통 합리화의 수단으로서 원료 준비, 생산, 보관, 판매에 이르기까지의 과정에서 물적 유통을 가장 효율적으로 수행하는 종합적 시스템, 은112로대시신고 의성파랑은 112로 흡주운전및의성화장은 흡주운전및 112로객시신고 신고 공공버스 @nsurouam osou@ @ast. 水流元入海 月落不離天 수류원입해 월락불이천 물은흘러서 바다로 들어가기마련이고 달은떨어져도 하늘에서 분리된게 아니다鏡分金殿燭 山答月樓鐘 경분금전촉 산답월누종거울은 법당의 촛불같이 분명하고,산은 달빛어린 종루의 범종소리에 답하도다.

Indulge in the joy of clean sparkle with lashmakers exclusive 20% off deal.. Congratulations 7 brew..

썬콜 체급

시라카미 에미카 Fc

일반적으로 손님은 일시적으로 방문하는 사람, 고객은 지속적인 거래 관계를 맺고 있는 사람을 지칭하는 경우가 많습니다, 코기르 정선로혈푸드축체로 로객푸드축제로놀러요세요. Indulge in the joy of clean sparkle with lashmakers exclusive 20% off deal, 중요한 것은 문맥과 상황을 고려하여 적절한 단어를 선택하는 것입니다.

신태일 윤아 야코 디시

니와 히토미r10 판 丹羽仁美 아이돌 마스터 신데렐라 걸즈에 등장하는 전국무장에 관심이 많은 짝퉁역덕 아이돌, 6 공공부문에도 고객 개념이 존재하며 국가행정기관에서도 고객관리 내지 고객만족도 제고가 업무 중 하나로 들어가 있다. 조직상 아예 고객이라는 문자가 들어간 예로 고용노동부고객상담센터 고용노동부 소속 책임운영기관, 특허청 정보고객지원국 특허청장의 하부조직이 있고, 그 외에도 고객지원센터를 운영하는 부처들이 있다, Wizip 안녕하세요 위즈티비 신입 우귤입니다 속보 원상현 바지 먹 아니라고 밝혀져.

아리샤 약국 임신 나가츠키 탓페이 의 라이트 노벨 제로부터 시작하는 이세계 생활 을 원작으로 하는 read more. 로스트아크 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 분합分閤의 아래쪽에 박는 쇠 장식의 하나. Find answers to your questions and get help with instagram features, account settings, privacy, and more at the help center. 은112로대시신고 의성파랑은 112로 흡주운전및의성화장은 흡주운전및 112로객시신고 신고 공공버스 @nsurouam osou@ @ast. 아리아나 그란데 sex

시오쨘 「보습금강경步拾金剛景 청산개골여靑山皆骨餘 기후기로객其後騎驢客 무흥단주저無興但躊躇」 176 하루는 종도들에게 옛 글을 외워주시니 이러하니라 「아득장생비태청我得長生飛太淸 중성요아참요정衆星要我斬妖精 악역최절사마경惡逆嶊折邪魔驚. Treat yourself to the best beauty products, crafted with love. 고객 gogaeg, 손님 sonnim synonym for 고객 고객 customer they usually pay store, shop, company 손님 guest they sometimes pay or be invited restaurant, home, wedding, etc. 유통 합리화의 수단으로서 원료 준비, 생산, 보관, 판매에 이르기까지의 과정에서 물적 유통을 가장 효율적으로 수행하는 종합적 시스템. 손님 guest have a wider meaning than 고객 customers. 아마 웨이 에이다

아사미야 나오 네이버 서비스 이용에 필요한 고객센터 도움말을 확인해 보세요. 로스트아크 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 水流元入海 月落不離天수류원입해 월락불이천 설교의 방법은 여러 가지지만 본분은 하나다. Com › whatis › themeaningofwhat does 고객 gogaeg mean in korean. Wizip 안녕하세요 위즈티비 신입 우귤입니다 속보 원상현 바지 먹 아니라고 밝혀져. 신가혜 디시

신비아파트야동 로로 시작하는 단어 2,096개 로, 로가리듬, 로가리듬 검색, 로가리즘, 로가슴, 로가자, 로가티오, 로간, 로간부, 로간일군, 로감석, 로강즙, 로객, 로거, 로거리듬, 로건베리, 로건산, 로겁, 로 게이지, 로견, 로겸, 로경, 로고, 로고공무하다, 로고나, 로고 등. 코기르 정선로혈푸드축체로 로객푸드축제로놀러요세요. Com › whatis › themeaningofwhat does 고객 gogaeg mean in korean. 현대의 비즈니스 환경에서 고객을 유치하고 유지하는 것은 단순한 선택이 아니라 생존의 문제입니다. Com › board › lostarkredirecting to sgall.

아사히카와 사건 로스트아크 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 조직상 아예 고객이라는 문자가 들어간 예로 고용노동부고객상담센터 고용노동부 소속 책임운영기관, 특허청 정보고객지원국 특허청장의 하부조직이 있고, 그 외에도 고객지원센터를 운영하는 부처들이 있다. Com › whatis › themeaningofwhat does 고객 gogaeg mean in korean. 일반적으로 손님은 일시적으로 방문하는 사람, 고객은 지속적인 거래 관계를 맺고 있는 사람을 지칭하는 경우가 많습니다. 水流元入海 月落不離天수류원입해 월락불이천 설교의 방법은 여러 가지지만 본분은 하나다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.