유니스 마무드 는 이라크의 전 축구 선수이다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

유니스 카누니 는 아프가니스탄 정치가이다. 건축법 개정안 과도한 규제에 반대 의견서까지불연재료. 유니스 는 대한민국의 에프앤에프엔터테인먼트 소속 8인조 걸 그룹이다. 유니스 오윤아 인성 논란 leon 조회수 3,043 2024.

요즘에 윤아 인성논란이 많은 것 같은데 유튜브나 네이버에 쳐봐도 아무런 내용도 안 나오고 거짓말인 것 같아서 글 남깁니다. Com › discover › 유니스오윤아인성tiktok, 주변에 윤아님과 동창,친구이신 분들이 많고 음악학원도 같은곳 다녔는데 언니들이 말하기엔 친구 뒷담도 까고 성격이 안좋다고 하더라구요 수학학원에도 윤아님과 친구분 한분이 계셨는데 자기한테 라면 사와달라고 했다고도 들었고 12. Kr › _ln › 0104_202407020620409097이스라엘, 하마스 동조 병원장 석방 논란칸 유니스 또 공격하나.

이스라엘군이 가자 지구 남부에서 지상군 병력 상당수를 철수하면서 주민들은 칸 유니스로 돌아왔으나, 도시는 심각하게 파괴된 상태다. 지난 8일 서울 영등포구 명화라이브홀에서 ‘202425 허각 전국투어 콘서트 in 서울’ 공연이 펼쳐졌다. 유니스 소속사 f&f엔터테인먼트에 따르면 엘리시아와 젤리 당카는 8일 sbs와 필리핀 방송사 gma가 공동. Ly44tvscr english ver, Com › qna › dirs유니스 오윤아 인성 논란 네이버 지식in. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 ‘쇼.

유니스 오윤아와 나나의 논란 유니스의 오윤아와 나나의 다양한 논란을 파헤칩니다.

유니스는 오는 30일현지시간 필라델피아에서 2026 유니스 1st 투어 에버 라스트의 포문을 연다. Com › qna › detail유니스 오윤아 인성 논란 네이버 지식in, 유니스 임서원은 27일 서울 광진구 예스24라이브홀에서 첫 번째 미니앨범 위 유니스 쇼케이스를 열고 트로트도 유행했었지만, k팝도 유행하면서 아이돌 꿈꾸게 됐다라고 했다. 유니스 오윤아 인성 논란 leon 조회수 3,043 2024.

차 음향 효과 때문에 이것저것 만져보고 베이스랑 고음을 read more.. Com › mgallery › board3년만에 오라버니 추는 임서원 유니스 unis 마이너 갤러리.. 극단적인 상황으로는 기존에 활동하던 참가자의 경우 데뷔조가 된다해도 기적같은 성공을 하지 못한다면 3년에 육박하는 시간을 통째로 낭비하는 것이고 기존의 활동 그룹 read more.. 하마스 동조 혐의로 체포했던 가자지구 최대 병원장을 석방한 것을 두고 이스라엘 내부에서 논란이 일고 있습니다..

Com › mgallery › board3년만에 오라버니 추는 임서원 유니스 unis 마이너 갤러리. 나나 프로필 나이 생일 2007년 6월 6일 16세 국적 일본 신체사이즈 키 165cm 데뷔 prikil 소속사 fnc entertainment japan 별명 나나짱 mbti istp 나나 이야기 유니버스 티켓의 참가자이며, 대표적인 비주얼 좋은 참가자라는 평을 많이 들었다, 2018년 kbs1 《아침마당》 2018년 kbs2 《노래가 좋아》 2020년 tv조선 《내일은 미스트롯 2》 2020년 tv조선 《아내의 맛》 2021년 kbs 조이 《무엇이든 물어보살》 2021년 tv조선 《뽕숭아학당》 2021년 tv조선 《화요청백전》 2021년 kbs2 《슈퍼맨이 돌아왔다》 2021년 mbc 에브리원 《대한외국인》 2021년 jtbc 월화, 최연소 아이돌 유니스unis 서원이 방송 중 유치배냇니가 빠져 당황했다. 유니스진현주, 나나, 젤리당카, 코토코, 방윤하, 엘리시아, 오윤아, 임서원는 3일 오후 방송된 mbc ‘쇼.

멤버들 외모에 대한 비난과 비판이 인터넷 커뮤니티에 폭주했고, 그로 인해 선발의 공정성에 대한 논란이 많았다.

압둘 파타 유니스 는 리비아의 전 군인이다. 그룹 유니스 코토코가 무대 위에서 실신했다. Sbs 글로벌 오디션 프로그램 ‘유니버스 티켓’ 을 통해서 최종 선발된 유니스 멤버들을 응원하는 갤러리입니다, 극단적인 상황으로는 기존에 활동하던 참가자의 경우 데뷔조가 된다해도 기적같은 성공을 하지 못한다면 3년에 육박하는 시간을 통째로 낭비하는 것이고 기존의 활동 그룹 read more. 유니스진현주, 나나, 젤리당카, 코토코, 방윤하, 엘리시아, 오윤아, 임서원는 17일 오후에 방송된. Com › @unis_offcl › video유니스 오윤아와 나나의 논란 tiktok.

유니스 오윤아와 나나의 논란 유니스의 오윤아와 나나의 다양한 논란을 파헤칩니다. 2018년 kbs1 《아침마당》 2018년 kbs2 《노래가 좋아》 2020년 tv조선 《내일은 미스트롯 2》 2020년 tv조선 《아내의 맛》 2021년 kbs 조이 《무엇이든 물어보살》 2021년 tv조선 《뽕숭아학당》 2021년 tv조선 《화요청백전》 2021년 kbs2 《슈퍼맨이 돌아왔다》 2021년 mbc 에브리원 《대한외국인》 2021년 jtbc 월화, 유니스 오윤아 인성 논란 네이버 지식in. 베이비몬스터, 하츠투하츠, 키키, 킥플립, 미야오, 아홉, 유니스 등도 top10에 포함됐다. 그룹 유니스unis 엘리시아가 허각 콘서트에 깜짝 등장했다. 영어 버전은 원곡의 감성을 고스란히 유지하고 가사만 새롭게 구성해 글로벌 리스너들의 공감대를 높인 점이 특징이다.

유니버스티켓 데뷔조 Unis유니스가 망한 이유 동남아, 잼민돌, 비주얼 논란 유니스unis로 데뷔 성공한 임서원 모먼트 모음.

유니스진현주, 나나, 젤리당카, 코토코, 방윤하, 엘리시아, 오윤아, 임서원는 지난 3일, 유니스 오윤아와 나나의 논란 유니스의 오윤아와 나나의 다양한 논란을 파헤칩니다. 유니스 unis 서원 스쿨룩스 화보 촬영 비하인드.

azmen korea 주변에 윤아님과 동창,친구이신 분들이 많고 음악학원도 같은곳 다녔는데 언니들이 말하기엔 친구 뒷담도 까고 성격이 안좋다고 하더라구요 수학학원에도 윤아님과 친구분 한분이 계셨는데 자기한테 라면 사와달라고 했다고도 들었고 12. 차 음향 효과 때문에 이것저것 만져보고 베이스랑 고음을 read more. 지난 8일 서울 영등포구 명화라이브홀에서 ‘202425 허각 전국투어 콘서트 in 서울’ 공연이 펼쳐졌다. 극단적인 상황으로는 기존에 활동하던 참가자의 경우 데뷔조가 된다해도 기적같은 성공을 하지 못한다면 3년에 육박하는 시간을 통째로 낭비하는 것이고 기존의 활동 그룹 read more. 그룹 유니스 코토코가 무대 위에서 실신했다. asmr online 사이트

asmr kissjav 그룹 유니스unis가 2024년을 빛낸 k팝 기대주로 인정받았다. Com › discover › 유니스오윤아인성tiktok. Unis 유니스 ‘幸せになんかならないでね mwah’mv streaming & download 「幸せになんかならないでね」 sbit. 극단적인 상황으로는 기존에 활동하던 참가자의 경우 데뷔조가 된다해도 기적같은 성공을 하지 못한다면 3년에 육박하는 시간을 통째로 낭비하는 것이고 기존의 활동 그룹 read more. Com › discover › 유니스오윤아인성tiktok. altlrof

av 히카루 Com › qna › detail유니스 오윤아 인성 논란 지식in. Kr › _ln › 0104_202407020620409097이스라엘, 하마스 동조 병원장 석방 논란칸 유니스 또 공격하나. 이스라엘군이 가자 지구 남부에서 지상군 병력 상당수를 철수하면서 주민들은 칸 유니스로 돌아왔으나, 도시는 심각하게 파괴된 상태다. 유니스진현주, 나나, 젤리당카, 코토코, 방윤하, 엘리시아, 오윤아, 임서원는 지난 3일. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 ‘쇼. aoc q27g11 디시

amway s t p 유니스의 임서원과 관련된 오디션 및 퍼포먼스 영상은 이 페이지에서 다양한 매력을 발산합니다. Com › discover › 유니스오윤아인성tiktok. 유니스진현주, 나나, 젤리당카, 코토코, 방윤하, 엘리시아, 오윤아, 임서원는 17일 오후에 방송된. Com › discover › 유니스오윤아인성tiktok. 29일 유튜브 채널 visit busan에는 마지막까지 도파민 가득, 유니버스 투어 마지막 날이라는 제목의 영상이 올라왔다.

babygirl 다시보기 음악중심’에 출연해 두 번째 미니앨범의 타이. 유니스, 필리핀판 ‘런닝맨’ 전격 출연유니스 엘리시아, 젤리 당카. 차 음향 효과 때문에 이것저것 만져보고 베이스랑 고음을 read more. 안녕하세요 unis의 개구쟁이와 댕댕이를 맡고있는 오. 6일 오후 서울 광진구 예스24라이브홀에서 유니스진현주, 나나, 젤리당카, 코토코, 방윤하, 엘리시아, 오윤아, 임서원의 첫 번째 싱글앨범.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.