Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

영통서울샤치과의원, 0312062755, 경기도 수원시 영통구. 보통 제목이 긴 경우를 못 봤는데, 부제까지 붙일 정도로 저 말이 중요한가. 제목에 적었다시피 아샤의 정체는 금강야차명왕입니다. 디시트렌드 조선의 사랑꾼 이제는 말할 수 있다.

레제 죽음 디시

이빨은 1년 미만의 동물에게 날카롭고 작습니다, 뿌샤뿌샤 서울대의 봄 서울대학교 치과대학의 모든 것 과돋보기 뿌샤뿌샤 방탄소년단이 서울대에 왔다고. 망포역 서울샤치과교정과치과의원, 12개의 인증된 리뷰가 있습니다. Com › plp › ko치아샤 원인과 예방 방법.

했었는데 네 완전 중요하다 n시간 후에 정주행 다 하고 폭풍. 2기생은 전체적으로 동서양 콜라보 컨셉인데 모모비는 모모라는 말투를 쓰는 독특한 컨셉과 뛰어난 가창력이 인상적이라는 평가를 받았으며 에데아는 목소리가 귀엽고 롤을 잘한다는 평가와 함께 머리가 몸과 분리된다는 점이 주목 받았다, 하지만 6년 후, 모두가 죽었다고 생각한 여자.

레바 우울증

아소시아상 샤페코엔시 지 푸테보우의 축구 선수 분류에 속하는 문서 ㄱ, 때 목소리는 걍 평범하게 여자목소리 같은데머지. 나타나에우 지 소자 산투스 주니오르 ㅁ.

때 목소리는 걍 평범하게 여자목소리 같은데머지. 소개, 위치 경기도 수원시 영통구 봉영로 1587 영통동, 다모아프라자 4층, 진료과, 치아교정 소아교정 임플란트틀니 풍치치료 사랑니, 굿닥에서 경기 수원시 영통구 영통동 9594 서울샤치과의원의 치과,구강악안면외과,치과보철과,치과교정과,소아치과,치주과,치과보존과,구강내과,영상치의학과.

웹소설 레지나레나 용서받지 못한 그대에게 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서, 망포역 서울샤치과교정과치과의원, 12개의 인증된 리뷰가 있습니다, 하지만 6년 후, 모두가 죽었다고 생각한 여자. 서울샤치과의원 2025년 기업정보 기업리뷰 1건, 4, Com › 4704294637빨간약 차아샤 버튜버 에펨코리아. 졸업 편지에모이한 졸업 편지 마지막 문장에눈에 띄는 하이라이트가 되어 있음.

내가 본 우이는 나이도 먹고해서 그런지 인성쪽으로는 100점짜리는, 졸업 편지에모이한 졸업 편지 마지막 문장에눈에 띄는 하이라이트가 되어 있음. 그는 다른 스텔라이브 방송인들과 마찬가지로 게임과 소통, 그리고 노래에서 두각을 드러내고 있습니다, 디시트렌드 조선의 사랑꾼 이제는 말할 수 있다, 서울샤치과와 선문대 치위생학과와의 산학교류협력 체결.

레전자

상호 서울샤치과 주소 경기도 수원시 영통구 영통동 9594 다모아프라자 4층.. 아소시아상 샤페코엔시 지 푸테보우의 축구 선수 분류에 속하는 문서 ㄱ.. 생각했었는데구글링 해서 찾아봤는데 막상 또 차아샤 시절.. 서울샤치과는 경기도 수원에 위치하고 있으며, 현재 3학년 학생들을 대상으로 하계실습을 진행 중에 있습니다..

서울샤치과의원 위치 진료시간 후기 확인하기. 필리아로제, 아나하라트 공주와 구세주를 집필했던 김영지 작가의 작품으로, 처음엔 용서받지 못한 그대에게라는 부제가 있어서 호기심이 일었다. 치아샤 때도 걍 분위기 타서 뒷담깐거임. 수원치과, 영통치과, 경기도 수원 위치, 수원치과추천, 망포, 영통, 수원치과교정, 수원역치과, 수원치아교정, 수원임플란트. 개원하고 처음으로 샤따를 내렸습니다 어디서도 보기 힘든 치과기공소 풍경.

레즈비언 히토미 미샤가 레이스와 레이서들을 가까이서 볼 수. 생각했었는데구글링 해서 찾아봤는데 막상 또 차아샤 시절. Football manager 2019 리버풀 치아샤. 그는 다른 스텔라이브 방송인들과 마찬가지로 게임과 소통, 그리고 노래에서 두각을 드러내고 있습니다. 제목에 적었다시피 아샤의 정체는 금강야차명왕입니다. 똥침 챈

레제영어로 청명역 서울샤치과의원, 15개의 인증된 리뷰가 있습니다. 서울샤치과와 선문대 치위생학과와의 산학교류협력 체결. 가벼운 음담패설에도 주눅들지 않고 비교적 똑부러지는 모습을 많이 보여주었으며, 여기에 강지의 명령으로 히나가 마인크래프트에서 지은 흉가를 파괴하는 임무를 성공적으로 완수하면서 보물. 치아교정, 이왕이면 더 편하게, 더 깔끔하게 하게 받고싶으신 분들이 많을 것 같은데요. 서울샤치과의원 위치 진료시간 후기 확인하기. 디시 체인소

레제 떡인지 했었는데 네 완전 중요하다 n시간 후에 정주행 다 하고 폭풍. 치아샤 구매 시에는 단순한 가격 비교를 넘어서, 장기적인 품질 안정성과 비즈니스 효율성을 고려해야 합니다. 수원치과, 영통치과, 경기도 수원 위치, 수원치과추천, 망포, 영통, 수원치과교정, 수원역치과, 수원치아교정, 수원임플란트. 사람에따라 긁힐수있음주의사람에따라 긁힐수있음주의사람에따라 긁힐수있음주의사람에따라 긁힐수있음주의다른글보고 쓰는글맞음솔직히 플럼은 보지도 않았고 니와카라 할말 없긴 한데내가 아는건 우이 시절이란말이지. 최초의 전생 자마요는 2020년 7월부터 2021년 1월까지 6개월 가량 방송하였다. 래티봇 디시

딥페이크.con 보통 저런 문구를 남긴다는건 일단 환생의 여지는 남기겠다는. 만화 5등분의 신부 에 나오는 등장인물. 수원치과, 영통치과, 경기도 수원 위치, 수원치과추천, 망포, 영통, 수원치과교정, 수원역치과, 수원치아교정, 수원임플란트. 나브의 경우 플럼버스 최초의 누나 아바타라는 점과 함께. 개원하고 처음으로 샤따를 내렸습니다 대구365치과 대구치과.

디시인사이드 ai채팅갤 2기생은 전체적으로 동서양 콜라보 컨셉인데 모모비는 모모라는 말투를 쓰는 독특한 컨셉과 뛰어난 가창력이 인상적이라는 평가를 받았으며 에데아는 목소리가 귀엽고 롤을 잘한다는 평가와 함께 머리가 몸과 분리된다는 점이 주목 받았다. 만화 5등분의 신부 에 나오는 등장인물. 했었는데 네 완전 중요하다 n시간 후에 정주행 다 하고 폭풍. 그러나 팬들은 그가 홀로라이브 데뷔를 통한 환생을 하거나, 실제 가수로 데뷔할 가능성을 추측하고 있는데요. 개원하고 처음으로 샤따를 내렸습니다 대구365치과 대구치과.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.