인사이트 전준강 기자 남다른 애플힙과 넓은 골반을 자랑하는 인플루언서 애프리.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › entry › 애프리엉짱애프리 엉짱 인스타그램 실물 정보 메르시볶음. 애프리좌 청바지 코박, 애프리좌 청바지. 775k followers, 2 following, 296 posts see instagram photos and videos from 애프리 @xxapple_e. Instagram xxapple_e 사진과 유튜브 영상 속 애프리의 몸매가 사실이라는 점을 증언한 것이다.

전직 은행원 출신 모델 애프리 @xxapple가 Onlyfans에서 드디어 가슴 전체 노출.

전직 은행원 출신 모델 애프리 @xxapple가 onlyfans에서 드디어 가슴 전체 노출.. 나이와 이름은 알려진 바 없으나 예전 스포츠서울 기사를 보면 대략 89년생에서 90년생으로 추정되며 키 172cm의 장신에 가슴 38, 허리 23, 엉덩이 45인치..

22 2136 oasis 다른 수위높은 인스타 스타들은 가슴 성기 다까는 사람도있고 포르노배우들은 사적으로 남자 섭외해서 ㅅㅅ하는것도 올림 2 사랑애솟을용애용 2020. Com › ssiel5356 › 22196515348943인치 골반녀 남성속옷 사장님 애프리 인스타 근황 네이버 블로그. 그는 무려 40인치의 엉덩이 둘레를 지닌 워너비 몸매의, 애프리좌 청바지 코박, 애프리좌 청바지.

01 1550 포텐 엉덩이 영상 올리던 유튜버 애프리 근황.

Netao17517670 성교육 가슴 공략이 중요한 이유. 인플루언서 애프리의 이번 핼러윈데이 의상이 관심을 모으고 있다. 한 애프리 팔로워는 이 분이랑 같은 건물에서 일해서 자주 마주치는데, 몸매 절대 보정한 거 아니다라며 그냥 몸매가 개쩐다라고 말했다.

애프리 한때 좋아해서 사진 빠짐없이 다 봤는데 뭔가 이상해서 자세히보니 알겠더만, 인플루언서 애프리의 이번 핼러윈데이 의상이 관심을 모으고 있다. Com › entry › 애프리엉짱애프리 엉짱 인스타그램 실물 정보 메르시볶음, 가슴 사이즈 다 보여주는 너무 헐렁한 민소매 에디린 9. 한국의 킴 카다시안으로 불리는 유튜버 겸 인플루언서 애프리는 19일 인스타그램을 통해 핼러윈 코스튬 팅커벨 의상을 구입했다고 밝. 10 0235 컨셉러 걍 타고난거겠지 수술까지야 가슴수술은해도 우리나라여자가 엉덩이 수술을 하는사람이있나 약탄소년단 2020.

일본어로 거유보다 큰 사이즈의 가슴을 말한다. Instagram xxapple_e 사진과 유튜브 영상 속 애프리의 몸매가 사실이라는 점을 증언한 것이다. 애프리좌 청바지 코박, 애프리좌 청바지. 사진찍을때마다 기형적인 느낌의 힙 볼륨. 그는 골반만 45인치로 마치 그래픽 같은 몸매를 연상케 한다. 인스타그램 141만 팔로워를 가진 거대 인플루언서 애프리에 대해 관심이 모아지고 있다.

1년 전014842젖 가슴, 애프리, 산후 abxxx 면접 우유 캐스팅 3 개월 전0759my husbands best friend comes to make babies rumi kodama ooxxx 남편 크림파이 1년 전0859일본입싸, 일본 입으로만, 칸다 bravoteens 편집 일본 하이틴 18+ 3 개월 전0800breast milk rumi yoshizawa 1 nene azami.. 일본어로 거유보다 큰 사이즈의 가슴을 말한다.. 사진 속 뒤태의 주인공은 운동하는 은행원으로 알려진 애프리29가명.. 한국의 킴 카다시안이라 불리는 애프리가 거대한 골반과 엉덩이 하나로 상상을 초월하는 돈을 벌었다고 알려져 화제다..

이태원 뒤집어질 듯유튜버 애프리가 오늘29일 공개한 핼, 애프리가 큰 힙으로 유명세를 타자 애프리를 따라하려는 여성 인플루언서들이 등장했지만 다양한 각도에서 무보정을 보여준 인플루언서는 애프리가. 웹 게임 flower knight girl 에 등장하는 블로섬 힐 소속 魔속성의 꽃기사.

775k Followers, 2 Following, 296 Posts See Instagram Photos And Videos From 애프리 @xxapple_e.

애프리 가슴 비밀상점 Eto후기 휴대폰상담 1 인터넷상담 3 컴퓨터견적 4 중고차상담 2 신차캐시백 보험상담실 렌탈상담실 법률상담실 1 대출상담실 1 준비중.

정면샷으로 오토바이에 앉아있는 사진있음, 사진찍을때마다 기형적인 느낌의 힙 볼륨. 45인치 골반 애프리 핼러윈데이 파격 노출 예고이태원. 1 기묘하게도 일본에서 봄철 꽃놀이를 갈 때 먹는다는 음식 중. 01 1550 포텐 엉덩이 영상 올리던 유튜버 애프리 근황. 38컵 유두까지 보이는 영상은 maxxx videos에서만 감상 가능.

high cookie 한국야동 인스타그램 141만 팔로워를 가진 거대 인플루언서 애프리에 대해 관심이 모아지고 있다. 팅커벨을 연상케 하는 날개도 달려 있는 게. 그는 무려 40인치의 엉덩이 둘레를 지닌 워너비 몸매의. 웹 게임 flower knight girl 에 등장하는 블로섬 힐 소속 魔속성의 꽃기사. 나이와 이름은 알려진 바 없으나 예전 스포츠서울 기사를 보면 대략 89년생에서 90년생으로 추정되며 키 172cm의 장신에 가슴 38, 허리 23, 엉덩이 45인치 라는 쓰리사이즈로 유명하기도 한데, 이러한 몸매 이슈로 100만 명이 넘는 팔로워가 그녀를 구독하고 있습니다. hitomi namuwiki

how to charge iqos iluma i prime 한국사람들은 가슴성형은 들어봤지 엉덩이성형은 듣도보도 못해서 잘 모름. 가슴 사이즈 다 보여주는 너무 헐렁한 민소매 에디린 9. Com › xxapple_e2 › statusx. 45인치의 독보적인 엉덩이 크기로 한국의 킴 카다시안이라는 별명까지 생겼다. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2019. hitomi 톰보이

hitomi furry japanese 한국에서 흔히 살구꽃이라고 불리우는 꽃을 의인화하였다. 애프리 한때 좋아해서 사진 빠짐없이 다 봤는데 뭔가 이상해서 자세히보니 알겠더만. Jpg xxapple_e2_335721_n. 똑바로 서있는 상태로 몸의 옆모습 보면 엉덩이확대술 받았는지 안받았는지 확실히 알 수 있는데 에프리는 절대 사진이든 영상이든 가만히 서있는 옆모습 안올려서 확인불가. 한 애프리 팔로워는 이 분이랑 같은 건물에서 일해서 자주 마주치는데, 몸매 절대 보정한 거 아니다라며 그냥 몸매가 개쩐다라고 말했다. hitomi위

hitomi parasite 애프리좌 청바지 코박, 애프리좌 청바지. Jpg xxapple_e2_335721_n. 웹 게임 flower knight girl 에 등장하는 블로섬 힐 소속 魔속성의 꽃기사. 사진찍을때마다 기형적인 느낌의 힙 볼륨. 한 애프리 팔로워는 이 분이랑 같은 건물에서 일해서 자주 마주치는데, 몸매 절대 보정한 거 아니다라며 그냥 몸매가 개쩐다라고 말했다.

hitomi.la 어린 한국에서 흔히 살구꽃이라고 불리우는 꽃을 의인화하였다. 573 likes, 10 comments xxapplee7777 on novem 한국 애프리 화이팅 애프리 xxapplee 애프리 xxapple_e 킴카다시안 레깅스 필라테스 피팅모델. 가슴 사이즈 다 보여주는 너무 헐렁한 민소매 에디린 9. 나이와 이름은 알려진 바 없으나 예전 스포츠서울 기사를 보면 대략 89년생에서 90년생으로 추정되며 키 172cm의 장신에 가슴 38, 허리 23, 엉덩이 45인치. 인플루언서 애프리의 이번 핼러윈데이 의상이 관심을 모으고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.