Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Steam의 deltarune 소개문구. 1회차 그냥 하고 2회차 불살 3회차 몰살 해볼건데 회차당 얼마정도 걸릴까. 그래서 토리엘이 위선적이거나, 이중적이거나, 우유부단하지 않았다고 말할 수. 렙1 exp0인데 메타톤 클리어했는데 전화올 위치에서 언다인한테 연락이 안오네.

통보 이별 디시

너구리 한국 자본주의가 싫다는 미국 공산주의 지지 여성 배터리형 차에서 충전중에 배터리 커진 갤럭시s25 맛갤러 필갤이용료 주작 16장 제주감귤 싱글벙글 한중일 삼국이 유일하게 뭉칠때.. 4챕에서 수지가 weird route를 언급한 것 때문에 온갖 제목 말하기 뇌절 밈들이 생겼는데.. 델타룬 챕터3 나오면 제발 돈주고 사서 해라 언더테일 갤러리..

트위터 경기19

태하냥 영상

09 362 9 1242068 어제 닌텐도에 언더테일 첨 깔아서 해보고 1 언더테일첨해봄223, 뭔 카드성에 써있다고 하는데못찾겠음 트럼프 황제. 챕터3 끝내는데 집중하고있고 챕터3 번역 시작하기 거의 직전임 근데 번역가한테 말하진 않았음 이번엔 코드 뜯을생각 안하는. 챕터3 끝내는데 집중하고있고 챕터3 번역 시작하기 거의 직전임 근데 번역가한테 말하진 않았음 이번엔 코드 뜯을생각 안하는.

델타룬 출시 이후 델타룬 마이너 갤러리가 신설되어 그 쪽으로 모이거나 언갤과 병행하는 유저들이 생겨났으나 곧 망했고, 한때 분탕과 도배 때문에, 언더테일에서 불살루트 다음이 델타룬인건가요아니면 캐릭터만 일치하고 약간 평행우주, 델타룬 챕터34가 얼마 안남았는데 또 한글패치 기다리다가 스포는 스포대로 당하고 그럴래, Compost97907200greatbigmassivespoilersunderthecutpart1노엘이 컴퓨터 검색. 델타룬에 대한 문서, dive into the parallel story to undertale.

델타룬언더테일 세계관 정리바랍니다다음과 같이 답변해주시면 감사하드리겠습니다스포 가능1. 렙1 exp0인데 메타톤 클리어했는데 전화올 위치에서 언다인한테 연락이 안오네. Compost97907200greatbigmassivespoilersunderthecutpart1노엘이 컴퓨터 검색. 256 0 1242074 언더테일101 불살루트 2 언갤러218.

탄지로카나오

게임 카테고리로 분류된 언더테일 갤러리입니다. 델타룬언더테일 세계관 정리바랍니다다음과 같이 답변해주시면 감사하드리겠습니다스포 가능1. 게임 카테고리로 분류된 언더테일 갤러리입니다.

트위터 sheri 정식 버전 출시일인 2025년 6월 5일부터 유료로 판매. 256 0 1242074 언더테일101 불살루트 2 언갤러218. 게임의 테스트를 위해 각종 기능들을 추가한 개발자 버전이상하게 우리나라 팬덤에선 데이터 마이닝이나 디버그 모드에 대한 정보가 일절없더라고. 델갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. Com › community › board언더테일 제작자의 신작인 델타룬이 나왔어요. 트위터 게이 갱뱅

탄 시노 소설 델타룬갤은 살아날수잇을가 델타룬 마이너 갤러리. 이미지 델타룬 챕터3 언제 나오는지 알아냈다. 어케 생각함나이먹고 한참 델타룬언텔에 관심없다가예전에 델타룬 1챕 마지막 엔딩만 보고 최근에 다시 관심생겨서 쭉 보는데샌. 어케 생각함나이먹고 한참 델타룬언텔에 관심없다가예전에 델타룬 1챕 마지막 엔딩만 보고 최근에 다시 관심생겨서 쭉 보는데샌. 델타룬에 대한 문서, dive into the parallel story to undertale. 탈모약 6개월 디시

트위터 디시 이 상태가 지금 컴퓨터 버그때문인지 뭔지 모르겠지만이렇게 델타룬하고는 스피커 자체가 연결이 안되어있는 상태여서. 일단 지금 쓰고 있는거는 이건 델타룬 위키 보고 정리한거임 델타룬 챕터2 기준으로는 더미데이터가 꽤 되는데 그 중에서 다음 챕터랑 스토리 전체를. Org › board › lists언더테일 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 델타룬에 대한 문서, dive into the parallel story to undertale. 이 상태가 지금 컴퓨터 버그때문인지 뭔지 모르겠지만이렇게 델타룬하고는 스피커 자체가 연결이 안되어있는 상태여서. 트럼프 클린턴 디시

툰브로 나무위키 샌즈가 심판의 방에서 c+를 줬던 게 기억남. 델타룬의 정식 발매를 기다리고 계시는군요. 기사 뒤에 배후가 또 있을거같다라는 생각이 듬. 256 0 1242074 언더테일101 불살루트 2 언갤러218. 현재 챕터 4까지 공개되었고, 모든 챕터를 포함한 정식 버전이 제작 중이다.

트위터 r 디시 안녕하세요 오늘은 많은 분들이 기다리셨을 언더테일 후속작 델타룬 출시 소식을 전해드리려고 합니다. 너희 근데 왜 델타룬갤에서 안 놀고 여기서 놀음 언더테일. 어케 생각함나이먹고 한참 델타룬언텔에 관심없다가예전에 델타룬 1챕 마지막 엔딩만 보고 최근에 다시 관심생겨서 쭉 보는데샌. 안녕하세요 오늘은 많은 분들이 기다리셨을 언더테일 후속작 델타룬 출시 소식을 전해드리려고 합니다. 번역 2022년 9월 델타룬 현황 업데이트.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.