Days ago 로스앤젤레스연합뉴스 임미나 특파원 지난해 청바지 광고 문구로 인종주의 논란을 일으킨 할리우드 스타 시드니 스위니 28가 이번엔 본인의 속옷 브랜드 광고를 위해 로스앤젤레스 la 명물 할리우드 사인에 무단 침입한 행위로 도마 위에 올랐다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

악마는 프라다를 입는다2 캐스팅된 시드니 스위니. 이슈 시드니 스위니 파리 인스타그램 업로드 ft. 이슈 시드니 스위니 목욕물로 만든 비누가 출시된 이후 유행타는 거 불쾌 7,148 11 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Twt 3,814 38 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

ㅇㅎ 남자들의 로망인 여배우 시드니 스위니.

13 1427 포텐 ㅇㅎ 진지한 자세로 인터뷰에 응하는 시드니 스위니 에불발희세호 조회 수 569922 추천 수 465 댓글 181 S.

Net › square › 3446723616더쿠 현재 갤럭시 모델이라는 할리우드 mz 배우.. 2018년부터 교제 중인 14살위 83년 남자친구와 22년부터 약혼한 상태였음 맨날 헤어졌다 아니다 말은 많았는데도 항상 그 이후에 투샷이 떴었는데.. 다만 원작을 본 사람들은 원작의 유포리아보다 hbo 유포리아가 훨씬 자극적이라고 말한다..

최근 시드니 스위니 코스모폴리탄 화보 노출ㅈㅇ 1.

Kr › board › 18138530pic 상한가 도전 사커라인. 우월한 유전자 광고에 발칵목욕물 팔던 배우, 무슨 일 할리우드 배우 시드니 스위니29가 출연한 의류 브랜드 광고가 백인 우월주의를 표방한다는 논란이 불거졌다. Net › square › 3446723616더쿠 현재 갤럭시 모델이라는 할리우드 mz 배우.

이슈 시드니 스위니 파리 인스타그램 업로드 ft, 1,437 7 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이슈 오늘자 진짜 신기한 상의를 입은 헐리우드 라이징스타 시드니 스위니. 최근 시드니 스위니 코스모폴리탄 화보 노출ㅈㅇ 1. 현재 갤럭시 모델이라는 할리우드 mz 배우.

Tv리포트이혜미 기자 백인 우월주의를 표방한 광고로 구설에 오른 할리우드 배우 시드니 스위니가 공화당 유권자로 등록된 사실이 파묘 돼 논란이 거세지고 있다.

1,437 7 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 어려서부터 빈티지 자동차에 관심이 많았던 시드니 스위니의 첫 차는 69년식 포드 브롱코, 저번에 신년 기념 포스트로 올렸던 이 사진도 삭제하고.

2000년대 av 배우 잡담 유포리아 난 시드니 스위니만 연기 건지고 옴 504 0. 할리우드 배우 시드니 스위니 29가 출연한 의류 브랜드 광고가 ‘백인 우월주의’를 표방한다는 논란이 불거졌다. 여자 끼리 돕는다는 것은 현실에 없다고 말하며 백래시. 올초에 여성 프로듀서가 시드니 스위니를 예쁘지도 않은 나쁜 배우라고 한것에 대한 반응으로 헐리우드 업계 전체에서 여자끼리 돕는다는건 다 가짜라고 말함. 이슈 자기의 목욕물을 함유한 비누를 판매한다는 배우 시드니 스위니 3,965 17 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 168._.y.m 영상

168._.y.m 디시 21 1417 제목이 너무 자극적인가싶은데 진짜 생각이 좀 의심스러워 이매큘레이트 본 덬이면 알겠지만 쓸데없는 가슴 노출과 대상화 많고 수녀+임신이라는 자극적인 소재에 여성이 끝도없이 불행해지는 스토리잖아. 이슈 인종차별인지 아닌지 계속 싸우고 있는 시드니 스위니 청바지 광고 5,848 46 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 본인 목욕물로 비누 만들어 팔아서 논란됐었던 미국 배우. 2018년부터 교제 중인 14살위 83년 남자친구와 22년부터 약혼한 상태였음 맨날 헤어졌다 아니다 말은 많았는데도 항상 그 이후에 투샷이 떴었는데. ㅍㅁ 갑자기 시드니 스위니 요새 논란이란 영상 떠서 찾아. 249로벅스 가격

4078686 31일 ap통신 등에 따르면, 시드니 스위니가 출연한 아메리칸 이글의 ‘굿 진스 good jeans’ 광고가 소비자들 사이에서 논란을 불러일으켰다. 배우 시드니 스위니의 아메리칸 이글 청바지 광고. 어려서부터 빈티지 자동차에 관심이 많았던 시드니 스위니의 첫 차는 69년식 포드 브롱코. Kr › board › 18138554더쿠 진짜 웃김 박원석이 들었다는 말 핫게 올리네 사커라인. ㅇㅎ 남자들의 로망인 여배우 시드니 스위니. 3951011

4669361 女優 잡담 시드니 스위니 ㅈㄴ 핫하다 1,870 3 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. ㅇㅎ 남자들의 로망인 여배우 시드니 스위니. Com › mgallery › board시드니 스위니 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Com › 7570083513ㅇㅎ 진지한 자세로 인터뷰에 응하는 시드니 스위니 유머움짤이슈. 광고 카피 sydney sweeney has great genes jeans 시드니 스위니는 우월한 유전자청바지를 가졌다.

4163396 spankbang Hours ago 지난해 7월 그가 출연한 아메리칸 이글 광고의 시드니 스위니는 훌륭한 ‘진’을 가졌다라는 문구가 유전자 genes와 청바지 jeans의 중의적 표현을 이용해 백인 우월주의를 암시한다는 비판을 받은 바 있다. ㅇㅎ 남자들의 로망인 여배우 시드니 스위니. Tv리포트이혜미 기자 백인 우월주의를 표방한 광고로 구설에 오른 할리우드 배우 시드니 스위니가 공화당 유권자로 등록된 사실이 파묘 돼 논란이 거세지고 있다. 무명의 더쿠 20260130 172814 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 이슈 오늘자 진짜 신기한 상의를 입은 헐리우드 라이징스타 시드니 스위니.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.