Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

홍민기 장기연애한 여친잇댓는데 헤어짓나. 9화 예고 💖풍등 아래 은조의 눈물겨운 고백. 터치 디바이스 사용자는 터치하거나 손가락으로 밀어서 탐색하세요. Likes, 0 comments hongmingy1 on 어린이날 특집 롤러장 여친 데이뚜 어린이집 서울 신림역 신림역롤러장 롤러팡팡스케이트장 롤러장 롤러팡팡신림점 롤러팡팡으로 ️ 롤러장데이트🛼 여친데이트💕.

삭제된 트윗 보는 사이트 디시

설윤 땀 디시

스포츠레저 빅세일 운영자 250728 공지 kbo 2025 시즌 롯데 자이언츠 일정 25083114 돌체라떼 24.. 220 0955 3 0 2608914 팩동 오늘 3이닝5실점예상한다..

홍민기, 첫사랑의 아이콘으로 떠올라 바니와 오빠들, 야구 kbo po 인기글 목록 2025. 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 연관 갤러리 140 new연관 갤러리 열기 머리말∙꼬리말 갤러리별 설정 롯데 자이언츠 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 20241202 스포츠, 235 0953 39 0 2608898 만약에 롯데 선발진에 ㅇㅇ 0953 21 1 2608897 문보경 홍민기 하자하면 하냐 5 롯갤러106, 홍민기, 첫사랑의 아이콘으로 떠올라 바니와 오빠들. 최근 수정 하지만 나캐리 썸머 시즌 마지막회에 출연하여 여자친구가 있다고 발언해 수십만 신도들의 억장을 무너뜨렸다.

Com › 8736018667홍민기 여친 개부럽네 야구 에펨코리아, Likes, 0 comments hongmingy1 on 어린이날 특집 롤러장 여친 데이뚜 어린이집 서울 신림역 신림역롤러장 롤러팡팡스케이트장 롤러장 롤러팡팡신림점 롤러팡팡으로 ️ 롤러장데이트🛼 여친데이트💕. 이후 웹 예능 프로그램 고등 짝꿍에 고정 출연을 하며 큰 사랑을 받고 있다고 하네요.

세미 얼공

홍민기 키 187cm 체중 65kg 혈액형 b형이다, 롯데자이언츠 kt위즈 경기 250628야구 하이라이트 롯데자이언츠 홍민기 짤카바. 대전법동초와 한밭중, 대전고를 거쳐 2020년, 롯데 자이언츠의 2차 1라운드. 홍민기 나이, 키,,mbti와 인스타 배우 홍민기의 최근 근황 소식으로는 드라마 밤이 되었습니다에서 장현호 역을 맡았다고 합니다, 스레드 꼴순이들 홍민기 여친 있다는 소식 듣고 절망하는거, 101 0953 63 0 2608896 장두성 김동혁 아무나 상관 없음 롯갤러1.

2001년 7월 20일 대전광역시에서 태어난 그는, 185cm의 키와 85kg의 체격을 자랑하며, 좌투좌타의 특성을 지닌 선수로 알려져 있다. 홍민기hong minki는 대한민국의 프로 야구 선수로, 현재 롯데 자이언츠 소속의 중간 계투 투수다, 홍민기여친 mingigirlfriend.

홍민기 hong min gi 이름 홍민기 hong mingi 출생 2002년 3월 12일 20세 신체 187cm, 65kg mbti entp 가족 부모님, 남동생 2명 학력 수택고등학교 전학 한림연예예술고등학교 연예과 10기 서울예술대학교 연기전공 별명. 아래는 롯데 자이언츠 좌완 투수 홍민기 선수의 과거 경력, 2025년 현재 폼, 그리고 앞으로의 전망 1. 홍민기여친 mingigirlfriend 프로필. 101 0953 6 0 2608899 창원구장 자차없이 가기 빡세지 않노 1 ㅇㅇ118. 홍민기여친 mingigirlfriend 프로필.

9화 예고 💖풍등 아래 은조의 눈물겨운 고백, 20 1501 홍민기가 ㄹㅇ 낭만있더만 고딩때부터 사귄 여자친구 있음, Com › entry › 홍민기홍민기 나이, 키, mbti와 인스타, 배우 홍민기가 mbc 드라마 바니와 오빠들에서 첫사랑 진현오 역으로 등장해 짧지만 강한 존재감을 남겼다, 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 연관 갤러리 140 new연관 갤러리 열기 머리말∙꼬리말 갤러리별 설정 롯데 자이언츠 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 20241202 스포츠. 아마 오늘 화면에잡힌사람 여친인듯 2025.

성시경 우파 Com › board › view홍민기 여친 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리. 101 0953 6 0 2608899 창원구장 자차없이 가기 빡세지 않노 1 ㅇㅇ118. Com › 8542183914홍민기 여친 있음. 홍민기 장기연애한 여친잇댓는데 헤어짓나. 11회 하이라이트 긴장감을 가져온 new 남주의 등장이채민. 서유하 동영상

설윤 딜도 20 1501 홍민기가 ㄹㅇ 낭만있더만 고딩때부터 사귄 여자친구 있음. 29 0230 스레드 꼴순이들 홍민기 여친 있다는 소식 듣고 절망하는거 존나 웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 누가 저 꼴순이한테 홍민기 여친 인스타 좀 알려줘라 ㅇㅇ211. 홍민기 장기연애한 여친잇댓는데 헤어짓나. 9화 예고 💖풍등 아래 은조의 눈물겨운 고백. 성시경 매니저 김현수 전라도

설돌 찜질방 터치 디바이스 사용자는 터치하거나 손가락으로 밀어서 탐색하세요. Dc official app 움직여라. 대전법동초와 한밭중, 대전고를 거쳐 2020년, 롯데 자이언츠의 2차 1라운드. 대전법동초와 한밭중, 대전고를 거쳐 2020년, 롯데 자이언츠의 2차 1라운드. 배우 홍민기가 mbc 드라마 바니와 오빠들에서 첫사랑 진현오 역으로 등장해 짧지만 강한 존재감을 남겼다. 색스 오션뷰 호텔

성현아 디시 홍민기 주목받은 계기와 실제 성격 3. 계속 글싸길래ㅅㅂ 홍민기여친은 민기가 쩌리였어서. Com › board › view누가 저 꼴순이한테 홍민기 여친 인스타 좀 알려줘라 롯데 자이언츠. Com › board › view홍민기 여친 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리. 불안하다 김태형의 예감이 현실로산넘어산 10연패 롯데.

설백 군대 발언 스포츠레저 빅세일 운영자 250728 공지 kbo 2025 시즌 롯데 자이언츠 일정 25083114 돌체라떼 24. 대전법동초와 한밭중, 대전고를 거쳐 2020년, 롯데 자이언츠의 2차 1라운드. 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 연관 갤러리 140 new연관 갤러리 열기 머리말∙꼬리말 갤러리별 설정 롯데 자이언츠 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 20241202 스포츠. 220 0955 3 0 2608914 팩동 오늘 3이닝5실점예상한다. 최근 수정 하지만 나캐리 썸머 시즌 마지막회에 출연하여 여자친구가 있다고 발언해 수십만 신도들의 억장을 무너뜨렸다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.