Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

The structure of the tropical rainforests in hainan is complex, the biomass density is high, and conducting ground surveys is difficult, costly, and timeconsuming. Railway east district is a district of siping city, jilin, china. 铁东区是辽宁省鞍山市所辖的市辖区。 地处辽宁省中部、鞍山市的东南部。 因地处沈大铁路之东而得名。 是鞍山市的政治、经济、文化中心。 东界二一九公园东山与立山区（鞍山高新区）接壤，西与铁西区、鞍钢厂区隔长大铁路相望，南界东环市铁路与千山区相连，北界通山街与立山区毗邻。 截至2015年，全区总面积为72. Gov › documents › 20250328additions and modifications to the entity list.

미연 웹툰

政府领导 政府文件 政策与解读 政府机构 政府会议 规划计划 政府采购 统计公报 预算决算 政府招投标 建议提案 政府工作报告 优化营商环境 应急管理 5, Org › 0000000292260189tiedong ma 0000000292260189 orcid, This chart lists only prefecturelevel and countylevel divisions of liaoning.

Railway east district is a district of siping city, jilin, china. సినిమాలో పాటలు బాగా విజయవంతమయ్యాయి. We provide uptodate info on everything from mustsee scenic spots to local hangouts. Most importantly, ppolike nanozymes ha. It is the seat of anshans government and the main business and shopping district of the city. Tiedong district is a district of the city of anshan, liaoning province, peoples republic of china.

Leishishan park, renmin park, 219 park and dongshan park, are located here, Railway east district is a district of siping city, jilin, china, View details about tiedong in anshan, liaoning china on apple maps. However, the saturation.

미스avi

Org › wiki › tiedong,_sipingtiedong, siping wikipedia.. Com, rajamouli revealed that the basic plot — where the hero dies and goes to yamalokam and comes back to earth — is inspired by the films devanthakudu 1960 and yamagola 1977 which starred jr ntrs grandfather sr..

15政务公开日 依申请公开 政府网站工作年度报表 政府信息公开年度报告. Most importantly, ppolike nanozymes ha. We introduce goat, a finetuned llama model that significantly outperforms gpt4 on a range of arithmetic tasks.

Com › item › 铁东区铁东区（辽宁省鞍山市下辖区）_百度百科. Cn › asstdq › index鞍山市铁东区人民政府, 媒体看铁东鞍山云：筑巢引凤政策加码！ 铁东区打造跨境电商产业新高地 20260116, The harbinbeijing highspeed railway also run through the siping east railway station, Com › 25545436tiedong district map city anshan, liaoning, china mapcarta, Find company research, competitor information, contact details & financial data for siping tiedong district favorable sports equipment wholesale co.

However, the saturation. Affiliations school of automation, chongqing university, chongqing, china, 政府领导 政府文件 政策与解读 政府机构 政府会议 规划计划 政府采购 统计公报 预算决算 政府招投标 建议提案 政府工作报告 优化营商环境 应急管理 5. Underwater dynamic targets often display significant blurriness in their forwardlooking sonar imagery, accompanied by sparse feature representation, Anshan has a monsoon influenced humid continental climate köppen dwa characterised by hot, humid summers, due to the monsoon, and rather long, cold, and arid winters, due to the siberian anticyclone.

The four seasons here are distinctive.. Qianshan and jade buddha garden are two highlights..

민서하 Onlyfans

Find company research, competitor information, contact details & financial data for angang group international trade corporation ltd. Discover the most popular places to stay in tiedong district, complete with recommendations from fellow travelers and special hotel offers, 政府信息公开 为了更好地提供政府信息公开服务，便于公民、法人或者其他组织准确地获取鞍山市铁东区的政府信息，提高政府工作透明度，助力法治政府建设，充分发挥政府信息对人民群众生产、生活和经济社会活动的服务作用，根据《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》（国务院令第711号. 铁东区是辽宁省鞍山市所辖的市辖区。 地处辽宁省中部、鞍山市的东南部。 因地处沈大铁路之东而得名。 是鞍山市的政治、经济、文化中心。 东界二一九公园东山与立山区（鞍山高新区）接壤，西与铁西区、鞍钢厂区隔长大铁路相望，南界东环市铁路与千山区相连，北界通山街与立山区毗邻。 截至2015年，全区总面积为72, Traditional chinese 鐵東區, We provide uptodate info on everything from mustsee scenic spots to local hangouts.

무인도 사원 여행기 치트 Com › businessdirectory › companyprofilessiping tiedong district favorable sports equipment wholesale. Find company research, competitor information, contact details & financial data for siping tiedong district favorable sports equipment wholesale co. We provide uptodate info on everything from mustsee scenic spots to local hangouts. 鞍山市铁东区因地处于沈大铁路以东而得名。铁东区位于辽宁省中部、鞍山市城区的东南部，是鞍山市城市辖区之一。东以玉佛山风景区为界与千山区接壤，西以沈大铁路为界与铁西区、鞍钢厂区相望。南以东鞍山铁矿为界与千山区毗邻，北以双头山、通山街为界与立山区为邻。 铁东区是鞍山政治. 동아출판의 초중고 교강사 강의 지원 서비스, 수업자료, 평가자료, 특별부록 등 제공. 민하린 나무위키

뮤블 평점 The structure of the tropical rainforests in hainan is complex, the biomass density is high, and conducting ground surveys is difficult, costly, and timeconsuming. Anshan, is a comprehensive industrial city of liaoning province reputed as the steel capital of china. Ma tiedong, associate professor of chongqing university, china. research on heat vulnerability provides a scientific foundation for identifying heatwavesensitive areas and vulnerable populations, thereby enabling. Find company research, competitor information, contact details & financial data for angang group international trade corporation ltd. 뭉냥이 나이

민한나 디시 Review activity for neurocomputing. Traditional chinese 鐵東區. Degree in control science and engineering from northeastern university, shenyang, china, in 2009. He is currently the associate professor of the school of automation, chongqing university, chongqing, china. Liaoning area and zip code including shenyang, dalian, anshan, tieling, fushun, chaoyang, dandong, huludao. 무협 히토미

무인도 사원 공략 The river is 439 kilometres 273 miles in length, and is. 3 °f in january to 25. Underwater dynamic targets often display significant blurriness in their forwardlooking sonar imagery, accompanied by sparse feature representation. The structure of the tropical rainforests in hainan is complex, the biomass density is high, and conducting ground surveys is difficult, costly, and timeconsuming. 3 °f in january to 25.

미선짱 실물 디시 nanozymes have received extensive attention in the fields of sensing and detection, medical therapy, industry, and agriculture thanks to the combination of the catalytic properties of natural enzymes and the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, coupled with superior stability and ease of pre. Ma tiedong, associate professor of chongqing university, china. Liaoning area and zip code including shenyang, dalian, anshan, tieling, fushun, chaoyang, dandong, huludao. The page youre looking for cant be found. Org › wiki › tiedong_districttiedong district wikipedia.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.