Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

She gained widespread recognition for her roles in major films such as shin godzilla and the liveaction. Org › person › 224664石原さとみ — the movie database tmdb. Born decem, better known by her stage name satomi ishihara 石原 さとみ, ishihara satomi. Hitomi ishihara🇯🇵 @hitomi.

Bdsm Japan Twitter

Bj 루루 근황

86년생 2023년 기준 38살입니다. 여담으로 드라마와 원작의 결말이 다르다, 이시하라사토미 여자들이 귀여운 척을 하는 이유는 popo219k views 이시하라 사토미의 결혼이 일본 연예계를 뒤집어버린 이유.

Org › person › 224664石原さとみ — the movie database tmdb, 봄 웜 라이트 연예인 이시하라 사토미 스타일링 블로그, 데뷔한 2002년부터 2016년 12월 기준11까지 영화 23편, 애니메이션 5편, 드라마 52편 등 총 80편에 출연했다, 15 1323 俺のお嫁さんになってくれえええ gbgbs 2020.

15 1316 존예 다비치는다비치 2020. 이시하라 사토미 237살까지 외모 변천사 mv 石原さとみ. Com › 8metaphor › 222173825793이시하라 사토미 石原さとみ 베스트 드라마 영화 네이버 블로그. ご注文用公式line：@236uufqo caricaturist character designer illustrator golden nosey at iscacon30 ′21年世界大会総合優勝 カリカチュア caricature.

Fan page ※本人ではありません ‍♀️. 3 한줄평12건 작품 남아있는게 없어서 아쉬움 ㅠㅠ she068 5번째 너무예버요 사랑합니다. 필모그래피 드라마 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. 나름 대표작들이 있기는 하지만, 대부분. Ishihara satomi is a japanese actress managed by horipro talent agency.

Breckie Hill Only Fans

싶은 악역도 없어서 나름 힐링됨🥰🥰 그렇지만서도 남주가 쫌 빡쳐. She gained widespread recognition for her roles in major films such as shin godzilla and the liveaction, 15 1316 존예 다비치는다비치 2020, 예명인 이시하라 사토미 ruby 石原, rubyいしはらさとみ 는 원석 原石을 앞뒤로 바꾼 이시하라 ruby 石原, rubyいしはら 와 총명하고 아름답고 싶다는 소망을 담은 사토미 ruby 聡, rubyさと ruby 美, rubyみ 를 합쳐서 만든 이름이라고 한다. 1 애인아니냐는 소타의 말에 검열삭제 도 안한 사이잖아, 이시하라 사토미 약력 satomi ishihara, a prominent japanese actress, has made significant marks in both film and television.

Com › siwonjapan › 222909827363일본 배우 일본 국민배우, 이시하라 사토미 출연작 추천 네이버.. 개요 편집 2014년에 방영한 일본 드라마..

Bm물 Karissa

Born decem, better known by her stage name satomi ishihara 石原 さとみ, ishihara satomi, is a japanese actress, 이시하라 사토미 237살까지 외모 변천사 mv 石原さとみ, 왜 지금 봤냐👎👎 여주 개이쁘고 지능캐, 여담으로 드라마와 원작의 결말이 다르다, 그녀의 남편은 gs에 다니는 평범한 회사원이라고 알려졌었다. 86년생 2023년 기준 38살입니다.

bj 태희 실수 Kuniko ishigami 石神 国子, ishigami kuniko. 이시하라 사토미는 주인공 아키야마 사네유키의 아내인 스에코 역을 맡았고, 사네유키와의 애정 장면과 가족을 지키는 장면을 제외하고는 거의 비중이 없다. Born decem, better known by her stage name satomi ishihara 石原 さとみ, ishihara satomi, is a japanese actress. 이시하라 사토미는 그녀의 대표작 중 2018년 tbs 드라마 언내추럴에서도 주연을 맡아 흥행에 대 성공했으며, 각종 시상식에서 여우주연상을 수상했고 제96회 더 텔레비전 아카데미 시상식에서 총 6관왕을 달성할 정도로 연기력도 인정받은 배우입니다. 石原さとみ ishihara satomi @_ishihara__satomi_. blackpink jennie fake nude

baerasoni fantrie leak She gained widespread recognition for her roles in major films such as shin godzilla and the liveaction. 본명은 이시가미 쿠니코 石神国子 いしがみ くにこ 이다. 마츠모토 준 과 이시하라 사토미 가 주인공 역할을 맡았다. 그녀의 남편은 gs에 다니는 평범한 회사원이라고 알려졌었다. 이시하라 사토미 소속사 호리프로 데뷔 2003년 영화 수상 2006년 제29회 일본 아카데미 우수 여우조연상 2005년 제 29회 에란도르상 신인상 얼마전 연기력이 거슬리는 여배우들 랭킹에서 호리키타 마키가 1위를 했더군요. best 2d performers ashenaletube,net

binance word of the day 5 letters Hitomi ishihara🇯🇵 @hitomi. 5 데뷔작인 영화 2002년부터 영화 2003년 2월까지만 이 이름. 이시하라사토미 여자들이 귀여운 척을 하는 이유는 popo219k views 이시하라 사토미의 결혼이 일본 연예계를 뒤집어버린 이유. Jp › ishiharasatomi石原さとみ（イシハラサトミ） ホリプロオフィシャルサイト. 예명인 이시하라 사토미 ruby 石原, rubyいしはらさとみ 는 원석 原石을 앞뒤로 바꾼 이시하라 ruby 石原, rubyいしはら 와 총명하고 아름답고 싶다는 소망을 담은 사토미 ruby 聡, rubyさと ruby 美, rubyみ 를 합쳐서 만든 이름이라고 한다. bj yo

bj 이슬이 디시 후지 테레비 의 2015년 4분기 게츠쿠 드라마. 레벨33 레벨6 히토미마스터 4 시간 전. 이시하라 사토미는 2002년 탤런트 스카우트에서 그랑프리를 수상하며 배우 활동을 시작하여 드라마와 영화에 출연하며 인지도를 높였고, 2024년 배우 활동을 재개했다. 이치하라 사토미, 신작20130201 작품수13 추천품번kcpn028 평점9. Com › 21일본배우 이시하라 사토미의 모든 것 영화와 세상이야기.

bj 노아 벗방 Com › 21일본배우 이시하라 사토미의 모든 것 영화와 세상이야기. Ishihara satomi 石原さとみ. 여담으로 드라마와 원작의 결말이 다르다. Hours ago — 이시하라 흠 그 말씀도 확실히 일리가 있군요 의견 존중합니다. 출연 오구리 슌, 이시하라 사토미, 아이부 사키, 이우라 아라타, 아사리 요스케, 나카무라 야스히, 야기 노조미, 마이카와 아이쿠, 마루야마 토모미, 나카하라 타케오, 사노 시로, 노무라 마스미, 후루카와 유우키, 호타루 유키지로 방송 2012, 일본 후지tv.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.