Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

혹시 의심증세가 나면 통증이 무조건 수반되나요. 이것만은 꼭 기억하세요 단순포진은 헤르페스바이러스 1형, 2형가 피부나 점막에 감염을 일으켜 수포 물집를 만드는 질환입니다. 지금은 어디서 사야할지부터 막막하네 병원 방문은 다 좋은데 헤르페스 병변은 시간싸움임. 여성분들께서는 정기적인 여성성병 종합성병검사 및 산부인과 방문이 중요합니다.

위피 이벤트 코드

그거다 고강도 운동으로 면역력 내려가서 그렇다 그러니 운동도 조절해가면서해 5 가끔 2형이 목욕탕에서 옮는다고 정신자위하는애들있는데 이건 절대 불가능하고 알다시피 헤르페스같은 바이러스는 점막을 통해 감염된다.. A가 켕길게 없으면 검사에 응해주면 되는거 아닌가..

유디 골목길

Com › bsmlove8 › 223989142709헤르페스 1형 직접 겪어본 후기, 헤르페스 1형 원인, 증상 네이버.. Com › mgallery › board후기 헤르페스 검사 후기 입니다 ㅠㅠㅠ 질병 마이너 갤러리.. 이론상 헤르페스 바이러스는 1형과 2형 불문 인체의 모든 조직을 감염시킬 수 있으며, 따라서 헤르페스 1형도 얼마든지 성기에 포진을 생성하는 고통을 선사해줄 수 있고, 2형도 얼마든지 구내염, 치은염을 일으킬 수 있다..

원하늘 엉덩이

2형이랑 상관없고, 내가 1형을 가지고 있는거야. 이것만은 꼭 기억하세요 단순포진은 헤르페스바이러스 1형, 2형가 피부나 점막에 감염을 일으켜 수포 물집를 만드는 질환입니다, 처음 먹을때 약간 소독약 비슷한 냄새가, 헤르페스가 면역력이 디시 트렌드 01. 2형이랑 상관없고, 내가 1형을 가지고 있는거야. 헤르페스 감염 시 발생하는 물집이나 궤양이 질 내부에도 생길 수 있으며, 이로 인해 분비물의 양이 증가하거나 냄새가 나는 경우가 있을 수 있습니다.

원피스 1167 화 번역 야스도 안했는데 평생 이런적 없었는데 코로나 걸리고 나서 바로 딤주에 걸렸어. 헤르페스님에 대한 이야기를 하는 갤러리입니다 헤르페스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 증상은 대부분 통증 및 간지러움을 유발. Com › bsmlove8 › 223989142709헤르페스 1형 직접 겪어본 후기, 헤르페스 1형 원인, 증상 네이버. 이론상 헤르페스 바이러스는 1형과 2형 불문 인체의 모든 조직을 감염시킬 수 있으며, 따라서 헤르페스 1형도 얼마든지 성기에 포진을 생성하는 고통을 선사해줄 수 있고, 2형도 얼마든지 구내염, 치은염을 일으킬 수 있다. 유출 fc2

웃참맨 퇴사 이유 헤르페스님에 대한 이야기를 하는 갤러리입니다 헤르페스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Io › questions › 43a9eec1acfcb462a71789251d이거 혹시 헤르페스 2형 일까요. 야스도 안했는데 평생 이런적 없었는데 코로나 걸리고 나서 바로 딤주에 걸렸어. 헤르페스 2형 확진되면 지옥이고 결혼도 못함 hiv 마이너 갤러리. 증상 발현되면 대증요법을 주로 사용함 항바이러스제 연고 등 2. 위키드 재미 디시

원희 미드 디시 이 바이러스는 증상 완화를 위해 초기 단계에서 적극적인 치료가 필요하며, 완전한 치료 방법은 현재 없습니다. 디지털투데이 ai리포터 구내염과 헤르페스 두 질환은 모두 입안에 불편함을 일으키지만 그 원인과 증상, 그리고 관리 방법이 다르다. 질 분비물 증가 일부는 평소보다 냉이 많아지고 냄새가 날 수 있음. Com › kindoc_official › 223754520827평생 안고 산다는 헤르페스 이런 증상이 나타나요 네이버 블로그. 지금은 어디서 사야할지부터 막막하네 병원 방문은 다 좋은데 헤르페스 병변은 시간싸움임. 유지 노바라

유디 실물 디시 헤르페스 1형은 키스로도 전염되지만 목욕탕에서의 수건 공유, 같이 찌개나 국을 먹는 행위, 음료수 나눠마시기 등 아주 사소한 것으로도 옮을 수 있기. 혹시 의심증세가 나면 통증이 무조건 수반되나요. 9700에서 매입할려는 치약 효능을 확인하고자 담배와 커피를 해 알바인 백호에게 후각 테러를 선사했는데 대놓고 똥냄새가 나왔다. 만약 감염된다면, 바이러스가 접촉침투한 그부위에 병변이 나는거죠. 야스도 안했는데 평생 이런적 없었는데 코로나 걸리고 나서 바로 딤주에 걸렸어.

유니티 모자이크 구내염은 주로 피로할 때 입안에 노랗고 동그란. Io › questions › 43a9eec1acfcb462a71789251d이거 혹시 헤르페스 2형 일까요. 구내염은 주로 피로할 때 입안에 노랗고 동그란. 맛은 구글 에서 arginine taste 라고 검색하면 자동검색으로 arginine tastes bad, arginine tastes horrible이 뜨며 냄새는 정액 과 유사하다 고 토로하는 의견이 흔할 정도. 야스도 안했는데 평생 이런적 없었는데 코로나 걸리고 나서 바로 딤주에 걸렸어.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.