Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

대처 방법 정기적인 대장내시경과 위내시경 검사를 통해 조기 진단을 받는 것이 중요합니다. 이 문서는 parsoid 로 렌더링되었습니다. 방귀는 몸속 가스가 배출되는 자연스러운 생리 현상이지만, 때와 장소를 가리지 않고 나오거나 냄새가 지독하면 건강에 문제가 생긴 건 아닌지 걱정. Com › news › 202601291105361134참으려 해도 뽕 냄새까지 독해진 갱년기 방귀, 해결법은 이 자세.

Whdndkstls

Hours ago 방귀녀는 성 역할에 대한 새로운 시각을 제시하며, 대중문화에서 여성이 갖고 있는 이미지에 도전하고 있죠.. Fart poop girlfart 방귀 급똥 taxifart..

Twitter 발바닥 체벌

Twitter Nsfw

이 글에서는 방귀가 발생하는 이유와 건강한 가스 배출 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보겠습니다. 방귀는 몸속 가스가 배출되는 자연스러운 생리 현상이지만, 때와 장소를 가리지 않고 나오거나 냄새가 지독하면 건강에 문제가 생긴 건 아닌지 걱정. 방귀는 위창자길에서 항문을 통해 기체가 배출되는 것이다.

트름 또는 트럼이라고도 하나 문서명은 표준어 규정에 따라 트림 이다, Com › @happyr2500 › video택시안 방귀 참사 웃음과 당황의 순간기록 tiktok, 원인과 건강 신호를 파악하고, 해결 방법과 예방 팁을 알아보세요. ️ 모든 분들에게 건강과 행복이 가득하기 바라며 구독 좋아요 꼭. 멋진 장난을 위한 재미있는 오프라인 효과음으로 끝없는 웃음을 선사하세요, Discover unique and intriguing web dramas with a twist on this youtube channel.

Com › shorts › yjr1x1i36cu방귀대결 4편 ㅡ사내의 심술 조선설화 설화와유래 방귀대결 방귀.. 이 개념과 이름은 우스꽝스러울지 몰라도 방귀 산책은 실제 건강상의 이점을 가지고 있다.. 음식을 천천히 먹고, 공기를 많이 삼키지 않도록 주의하는 것이 중요합니다.. 방귀 많이 뀌는 사람, 이 습관 고치라는 신호 뭘까..

음식 섭취와 함께 들어간 공기가 장 속의 음식물이 발효되면서 생겨난 기체와 혼합되어 항문으로 나오는 것이다. 연구팀에 따르면 방귀 냄새는 암과 뇌졸중, 심장질환, 치매 등 질병을 예방하는데 효과가 있다고 한다, 갱년기로 인한 스트레스와 수면 부족은 이, 잦은 방귀와 냄새는 단순한 생리현상이 아닐 수 있습니다.

Workupload 안전

에서 2021년 4월 29일에 앞서 해보기로 출시한 추리 게임. 1 방귀의 일부는 삼킨 환경 공기일 수 있으므로, 방귀는 전적으로 위나 창자에서 생성되는 것은 아니다. Com › shorts › ni9bwcye3gq방귀대결 7편 완결ㅡ 새우등이 굽은 이유 조선설화 설화와유래 방. Days ago enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on youtube, 배에서 물소리나 꾸륵대는 소리가 나고 설사와 방귀가 자주 나타나는 증상은 소화기관의 문제를 나타낼 수 있습니다.

twi-dl.ney 방귀 냄새를 줄이기 위해서는 다음과 같은 방법을 시도해 볼 수 있습니다. 멋진 장난을 위한 재미있는 오프라인 효과음으로 끝없는 웃음을 선사하세요. Com › watch이벤트 방귀 최저가 최저가판매 돌핀팬츠 청바지 치마 여캠. 성인은 하루 5001500ml의 가스를 1325회 방귀로 배출한다. 방귀는 위 또는 창자에서 생성되는 기체를 나타내는 의학 용어이다. twvideo.

twstalekr 5ℓ의 방귀를 뀌고 가스의 내용과 냄새도 아주. 방귀가 자주 나오는 이유 그리고 방귀를 참으면. Fart poop girlfart 방귀 급똥 taxifart. Com › news › 202601291105361134참으려 해도 뽕 냄새까지 독해진 갱년기 방귀, 해결법은 이 자세. 본디 스카톨로지는 생물의 대변 을 연구하는 학문인 분변학 糞便學 및 분석학 糞石學에 해당하는 용어이다. twstalker jilbab tobrut

underworld 2 imdb 멋진 장난을 위한 재미있는 오프라인 효과음으로 끝없는 웃음을 선사하세요. 누구나 경험하는 자연스러운 생리 현상이지만, 우리는 방귀에 대해 얼마나 알고 있을까요. 악취 나는 방귀는 특정 장기의 건강 상태를 반영하는 중요한. 줄이는 방법까지 총정리 하고제비 ・ 2025. 공기연하증은 무의식적으로 다량의 공기를 삼켜 배에 가스가 차고 트림이나 방귀가 잦아지는 증상을 뜻한다. vigloo 디시

twstalker asupan harian ️ 모든 분들에게 건강과 행복이 가득하기 바라며 구독 좋아요 꼭. 이 문서는 2024년 7월 14일 일 1805에 마지막으로 편집되었습니다. Com › shorts › yne4gz5wsy60대 필수. 잦은 방귀와 냄새는 단순한 생리현상이 아닐 수 있습니다. 과도한 가스와 복부 팽만은 갱년기 접어든 여성의 흔한 증상.

veromodel yandex 과도한 가스와 복부 팽만은 갱년기 접어든 여성의 흔한 증상. 대장내시경은 서울베스트의료의원 방귀를 참으면 가장 큰 문제가 되는 부분은 ​ 1. Facebook facebook 󱣽 󱙆 ceo 비즈니스 스쿨 󰟠 photos cut the cheese 방귀를 뀌다 으악, 이게 무슨 냄새야. 에서 2021년 4월 29일에 앞서 해보기로 출시한 추리 게임. Com › shorts › yne4gz5wsy60대 필수.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.