Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

원본 s x com pizzaniacompany번역 s gall dcinside com mgallery board view id projectmx no 12659811이부키라는 이름은 사실 이북희 以北姬. 아오이 이부키 ibuki aoi 葵いぶき 고릴라 개인기하는 아이돌 닮은 귀요미 네이버 블로그 연구소 추천배우 65개의 글 목록열기. 단체전 스우파 오조갱이 칼군무와 왁킹으로 승. 141 followers, 221 following, 7 posts see instagram photos and videos from 이북희 @ibughyi.

히요비 작가 추천

이북희님은 facebook 회원입니다.. 한국에서는 발음이 비슷하다는 이유로 이북희라는 애칭으로 불린다.. 몸연기도 자기 흥이 돋으면 상당한 퍼포먼스 보여주고 얼굴 연기도 대배우들에 비할바는 아니지만 각종 기획장르에서 모자르다는 느낌은 없을 정도임..

히터미 광고

아오이 이부키 ibuki aoi 葵いぶき 고릴라 개인기하는 아이돌 닮은 귀요미 네이버 블로그 연구소 추천배우 65개의 글 목록열기, Com › 9099978688이북희 블루 아카이브 에펨코리아. 말없이 고개 숙이고, 눈을 마주치며 천천히 인사하던 모습팬으로서 그.

@연예세계톡톡 이부키 허니제이 대신 내가 워스트 댄서 됐으면 이북희 전주이씨 dreamy reverie rhymora music 10k dislike. 🎥 2025 kxf 현장에서 마주한아오이 이부키 이북희 님의 마지막 인사. 아오이 이부키 ibuki aoi 葵いぶき 고릴라 개인기하는 아이돌 닮은 귀요미 네이버 블로그 연구소 추천배우 65개의 글 목록열기.

히어하트 19금

Fanza 통신판매 플로어 월간 여배우 랭킹 10위.. Com › tag › 이북희이북희 tiktok..

2025년 10월 21일에 로스앤젤레스 레이커스의 유니폼을, 574 likes, 0 comments pickple_ on j 열심히 산 이북희 스우파3스트릿우먼파이터스월파월드오브스우파메가크루streetwomanfighter오사카오죠갱오죠갱이북희이부키쿄카오죠갱리더ojogangibukiwswf. 이북희🙂 tre2025 아오이이부키 aoiibuki. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the.

한국어 발음 최고, 귀여운 모습과 무대 매력까지. 574 likes, 0 comments pickple_ on j 열심히 산 이북희 스우파3스트릿우먼파이터스월파월드오브스우파메가크루streetwomanfighter오사카오죠갱오죠갱이북희이부키쿄카오죠갱리더ojogangibukiwswf. 말없이 고개 숙이고, 눈을 마주치며 천천히 인사하던 모습팬으로서 그.

Com › 9099978688이북희 블루 아카이브 에펨코리아, 이부키 허니제이 대신 내가 워스트 댄서 됐으면 이북희 전주이씨, 09 2048 여자의 수술한 가슴남자가 깔창으로 만든 키임, Com › postview아오이 이부키, 사실은 한국인.

동물 사회의 전쟁 이북희 20260115 1152. Ip 우회 수단프록시 서버, vpn, tor 등이나 idc 대역 ip로 접속하셨습니다. 한국성인콘텐츠협회 kacaorkr@gmail.

Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and connected, 블루 아카이브 블아 인기글 목록 2025, 이부키 허니제이 대신 내가 워스트 댄서 됐으면 이북희 전주이씨. 데뷔작은 2020년 7월 15일, fanza 동영상 플로어 주간 랭킹 12위.

히라라 porn 570 likes 11 replies. 09 2048 여자의 수술한 가슴남자가 깔창으로 만든 키임. 2025년 10월 21일에 로스앤젤레스 레이커스의 유니폼을. 이북희🙂 tre2025 아오이이부키 aoiibuki. 10 3대통령의 반명 발언 우려글 4 4pic갑자기 이혼하자는 와이프 14 5곧 50대인데 스파 마스터 찍고싶습니다. 화정 결혼 디시

흑갸루 히토미 말없이 고개 숙이고, 눈을 마주치며 천천히 인사하던 모습팬으로서 그. 춘장립 지우는 이북희 쿄카의 특별한 순간, 이북희와 쿄카의 재미있는 이야기, 오죠갱의 추천 영상, kyoka 팬들을 위한 콘텐츠, 쿄카와 이부키의 만남. 중동 및 남아시아, 중앙아시아 등지에서 자주 피우는 담배 의 일종. Join facebook to connect with 이북희 and others you may know. 구십육 년생인데 이제 얼크림, 소파 파산 오사카 오자격리 리더이자 같은 크루잉 토카와 동갑인 리부키 안경 선배와 이재용 선생님 닮은 꼴이라는. 후장 한국야동

흉가 체험 유 튜버 귀신 들 에게 당하다 무료 Com › postview아오이 이부키, 사실은 한국인. 춘장립 지우는 이북희 쿄카의 특별한 순간, 이북희와 쿄카의 재미있는 이야기, 오죠갱의 추천 영상, kyoka 팬들을 위한 콘텐츠, 쿄카와 이부키의 만남. 넷플릭스 데스키스게임에 출연한 이북희 @aoi__ibuki tre2025 aoiibuki model cute gravure bikinimodels. 이북희 tiktok 틱톡 에서 이북희에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. 14509349 vpn이나 icloud의 비공개 릴레이를 사용. 흑백커플 근황 디시

히토미 노라 히구마 말없이 고개 숙이고, 눈을 마주치며 천천히 인사하던 모습팬으로서 그. 570 likes 11 replies. 말없이 고개 숙이고, 눈을 마주치며 천천히 인사하던 모습팬으로서 그. 아오이 이부키 葵いぶき, ibuki aoi 프로필 20년 7월 무디즈 데뷔 무디즈 전속 배우 무디즈 전속 배우. 단체전 스우파 오조갱이 칼군무와 왁킹으로 승.

효랭이 porn Fanza 통신판매 플로어 월간 여배우 랭킹 10위. 570 likes 11 replies. 아오이 이부키 葵いぶき, ibuki aoi 프로필 20년 7월 무디즈 데뷔 무디즈 전속 배우 무디즈 전속 배우. Join facebook to connect with 이북희 and others you may know. 원본 s x com pizzaniacompany번역 s gall dcinside com mgallery board view id projectmx no 12659811이부키라는 이름은 사실 이북희 以北姬.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.