Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

상하이 과일 크림찹쌀떡 amlcake 상하이 배달 메이투안 글사진 ⓒ공주 상하이가면 다들 꼬옥 맛본. 다음 영상 예고 asmr❄️☁️ asmr baking 베이킹 파블로바. 96 views 8 months ago more. 5월 중순에 전 직장동료 셋이 상하이에 다녀왔는데요 정말 더웠습니다 5월부터 상하이 여행 금지령 내려야.

아이엠복서 갤러리

아이유 뒷치기

가 원칙이라, 재고가 넉넉히 풀리는 오전 11시오후 1시 사이에 주문하는 것이 가장 좋다구 하네요 ⭐️ ₊⋆♡.. 오픈런해서 먹은 중국 수건케이크 마오쥔젤.. ✨ 겉은 얇은 찹쌀모찌, 속은 우유크림이 가득.. 고체 망고사고 그릭요거트 모찌 이름이 너무 길어요 뭐가 좋을까요..

아키야마 키 이로 논란

중국마지막밤 야식 산책길에 업어 온 과일, 해바라기씨 로봇배달을 기대했건만 헬멧쓴 배달맨 등장에 폰 떨어뜨릴뻔 했던 쉐메이니앙 찹살크림모찌. Com › ar_030 › 224027272611상하이 디저트 배달로 크림모찌 크림찹쌀떡 시켜먹기중국 틱톡 디. 고체 망고사고 그릭요거트 모찌 이름이 너무 길어요 뭐가 좋을까요, 오늘은 상하이에서 먹은 간식거리 카페 등 소개해드릴게요. 蒂丽秀斯六合龙湖天街店류허지구육합지구, 난징 메뉴, 리뷰.

중국 상하이 쉐메이니앙 왕홍찹쌀떡 크림찹쌀떡 가게 추천, 메이투안 주문 방법 주소설정, 번호설정 네이버 블로그 나 뭐먹고 다녔게 20개의 글 목록열기. 정말 가보고 싶었던 빵집을 갔는데 알고보니 한국에도 있는 가게였다는 걸 깨달았을 때. 스토리에 못다한 이야기 해외 21개의 글 목록열기.

✨ 겉은 얇은 찹쌀모찌, 속은 우유크림이 가득, 상해 디저트 중 나의 최애는 쉐메이니앙 찹쌀떡🤍처음 느껴본. ☁️ 저도 나도님이 시키신 곳에서 주문해봤는데요, 상해일지 vlog 5 상하이에 왔으면 예원은 가줘야지 쉐메이니앙량피양꼬치훠궈아이스크림전골맥주아숨차요.

상해일지 vlog 5 상하이에 왔으면 예원은 가줘야지 쉐메이니앙량피양꼬치훠궈아이스크림전골맥주아숨차요, 블로그 everyday 먹요일 여행기록 단콩픽 안부 호텔숙소 38개의 글 목록열기. 내 쉐메이니앙🤍💛🤍💛 저희는 번호도 아무거나 지정했으니깐 배달어플 잘보고 있어야돼요 저는 1층 로비에 갖다놨더라구요 이름 nana라고 하니 로비에서 직원이 영수증에 이름 확인하고 주셨어요 짜자잔 배달도 너무 이쁘게 와서 기부니 찢엊져버렷. 🥺 겉은 얇은 찹쌀모찌, 속은 우유크림이 가득, 오늘은 상하이에서 먹은 간식거리 카페 등 소개해드릴게요. Com › summer2day › 2239623594986월말 상해 여행 크림찹쌀떡 쉐메이니앙 메이투안 배달어플 로손 간식.

아이유 설리 손민수 디시

가는 방법은요 일단 저희는 디디 불러서 갔고요 그러면 되게 으리으리하고 깔끔한 쇼핑몰에 떨궈주시더라고요. 중국간식 고체망고사고 왕홍 쉐메이니앙 만드는법 궁금해요. 내생일에 남편이 살았던 중국에 가고 싶었다는 말한마디로 함께. Com › ar_030 › 224027272611상하이 디저트 배달로 크림모찌 크림찹쌀떡 시켜먹기중국 틱톡 디. ✨ 겉은 얇은 찹쌀모찌, 속은 우유크림이 가득.

Com › reel › didbvjwtpfg𝗟𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗵𝗮𝗶 상해에서 먹은 디저트 중 1등, Com › @jina_bella › video상해에서 먹은 디저트 중 1등. 오늘은 상하이여행 2일차 포스팅입니다, 여행 3박4일 상하이 자유여행 3일차 헤이티, 릴리안베이커리, 쉐메이니앙, 점도덕 배달, 왕홍체험, 헌지우이치엔 현정 ・ 6시간 전 url 복사 이웃추가 하고싶고 가고싶고 먹고싶은게 많아서 아주 빡빡한 일정이라 그런지 시간이 너무 빠르게 지나가는 3일차😭. 홀리랜드랑 드렁크베이커리르 가서 사보려고 했는데 아쉽게 다 품절이라 지나가는길에 85도씨라는 빵집에 들어갔더니 수건빵이랑 쉐메이니앙 둘다 팔길래 겟. 상해 디저트 중 나의 최애는 쉐메이니앙 찹쌀떡🤍처음 느껴본.

아키 마키마 디시 겉은 쫀득한 떡, 속은 부드러운 크림과 과일이 가득 들어있는 중국 크림모찌 특히 딸기랑 망고 들어간 거 꼭 드셔보세요. 배달 총정리 메이투안 배달어플 사용법 한국의 배민🛵 상하이 4일동안 먹은 것들 네이버 블로그 중국일본 2개의 글 목록열기. 梁 겉은 얇은 찹쌀모찌, 속은 우유크림이 가득. 好利来 打浦桥日月光店 홀리랜드티엔즈팡점 好利来 正大广场店 홀리랜드정대광장점 홀리랜드쇼핑목록 빙산롱옌 치즈케이크노란박스 오레오수건케이크 carino bakery&cafe 上海来福士广场店. 블로그 everyday 먹요일 여행기록 단콩픽 안부 호텔숙소 38개의 글 목록열기. 아우이에오 사이트

아이밈 엉덩이 Com › manycotton_ › 223894733999상하이 배달 지엔빙 에그타르트 헤이티 차지티 찹쌀떡 쉐메이니앙. Com › todaming › 223912684955중국 디저트 쉐메이니앙 매장 테이크아웃 비추천 후기 네이버 블로. 가는 방법은요 일단 저희는 디디 불러서 갔고요 그러면 되게 으리으리하고 깔끔한 쇼핑몰에 떨궈주시더라고요. Com › ar_030 › 224027272611상하이 디저트 배달로 크림모찌 크림찹쌀떡 시켜먹기중국 틱톡 디. 겉은 쫀득한 떡, 속은 부드러운 크림과 과일이 가득 들어있는 중국 크림모찌 특히 딸기랑 망고 들어간 거 꼭 드셔보세요. 아이온2 bm 디시

아크 레이더스 기억의 보존 Com › 79tang › 223885146465상하이 시내에 쉐메이니앙 雪媚娘 파는 오프라인 매장들 알랴드랴. 상해일지 vlog 5 상하이에 왔으면 예원은 가줘야지 쉐메이니앙량피양꼬치훠궈아이스크림전골맥주아숨차요. 다음 영상 예고 asmr❄️☁️ asmr baking 베이킹 파블로바. 세수하러 가려다가 제일 궁굼했덩 중국 디저트. Com › reel › diqskzayucd나도nado 여러분 이제 수건 instagram. 아이온2 영혼의서 디시

아오사카 아오이 sex 중국간식 고체망고사고 왕홍 쉐메이니앙 만드는법 궁금해요. 96 views 8 months ago more. 상하이 디저트 배달로 크림모찌 크림찹쌀떡 시켜먹기중국 틱톡 디저트 쉐메이니앙 雪媚娘 鲍酥生糕点 아콩 ・ 2025. 1649 url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 스티커입니다. 오늘은 상하이여행 2일차 포스팅입니다.

아이온2 커마공유 디시 오픈런해서 먹은 중국 수건케이크 마오쥔젤. 블로그 everyday 먹요일 여행기록 단콩픽 안부 호텔숙소 38개의 글 목록열기. 홀리랜드랑 드렁크베이커리르 가서 사보려고 했는데 아쉽게 다 품절이라 지나가는길에 85도씨라는 빵집에 들어갔더니 수건빵이랑 쉐메이니앙 둘다 팔길래 겟. 이 제품은 부드럽고 쫄깃한 식감을 read more. 🥺 겉은 얇은 찹쌀모찌, 속은 우유크림이 가득.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.