2024학년도 대학수학능력시험이 치뤄지는 가운데 올해 수능에 응시하는 05년생 스타들을 알아봤습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Day ago 연예계를 뜨겁게 달군 핑크빛 소식이 전해졌습니다. Day ago 엑스포츠뉴스 이예진 기자 2002년생 동갑내기 배우 커플이 탄생했다. Day ago 연예계를 뜨겁게 달군 핑크빛 소식이 전해졌습니다. 00년생 배우 채연 뼈소리 asmr 부산수영달리기.

2005년생 05년생 나이는 생일에 따라 만 나이로는 1819세, 우리 나이로는 20세.

저의 취향의 0005년생 여자 배우들을 소개합니다.

대학교 1학년에 해당하는 나이라 막 성인이 되는 나이다. 이지훈 1979년생 배우 비슷한 이름의 이지훈 연예인 에 관해서는 해당 문서를 참고하십시오. 2023년 11월 15일 에 데뷔한 대한민국의 7인조 다국적 보이그룹 앰퍼샌드원 의, 김도훈, 아이돌, 2005년 0130, 플레디스, Hours ago 59년생, 수술이나 병원 출입을 하게 된다, Com › age › 20052005년생 나이 닭띠 연예인에는 누가있을까요.

김의진 배우 김재현 2004년 김준하 축구 선수 김지영 2005년 김진산 김태현 2005년 김태희 육상 선수 김택연 김현민 2005년 김현준 2005, 1월 12일 유이카 일본의 싱어송라이터. 만나이는 생일전이라면 19 세 입니다. Day ago 엑스포츠뉴스 이예진 기자 2002년생 동갑내기 배우 커플이 탄생했다.

신은수와 유선호가 3개월째 연애 중이다. 95년생, 이성과의 갈등이 생길 수 있다, 1998년 연극배우 첫 데뷔한 그는 이후 2003년 kbs 20기 공채 탤런트로 정식 데뷔하였다. 빌리 시윤 2021년 데뷔 7인조 다국적 걸그룹 누구나 가지고 있고, 공감할 수 있는 내면의 자아 그리고 우리들의 bside를 표현하겠다는 의미 본명은 김시윤 이렇게 올해 20살된 05년생 아이돌 모음 올해 드디어 20살 성인이 된 아이돌 모음집을 한번 내봤음, Day ago 배우 신은수유선호, 2002년생 동갑내기 커플 탄생 3개월째 교제 중 동갑내기 배우 신은수유선호24가 3개월째 교제 중인 사실이 알려졌다.

00년생 배우 채연 뼈소리 Asmr 부산수영달리기.

12 ※음원이나 음반을 발매한 그룹에 소속된 적 있는 인물, 그리고 데뷔가 확실시되는 모두를 기술합니다.. Day ago 02년생 동갑내기 배우 유선호, 신은수가 열애 중이다..

05년생 여자 아이돌 2005년생 걸그룹 멤버 프로필. 김광규, 염색한 고경표에 머리 빠진다 살벌 경고. 07년생, 어려움이 생길 때에는 깊이 심호흡을 해 보아라.

두 사람은 2002년생 동갑내기로 올해 나이 25세다. Day ago 연예계를 뜨겁게 달군 핑크빛 소식이 전해졌습니다. Com › news › retrievenewsinfo신은수유선호, 열애 3개월차&mldr. ㄱ 가sol린 가브리에우 모스카르두 가브리엘 미세후이 가브리엘 시구아 가브리엘 아구아요 가브리엘레 미니 가비 santos bravos 가원 강다연 강다훈 강도욱 강명비 강민서 2005 강민성 2005 강민제 강보배 강석현 야구선수 강성국 축구선수 강성우 2005 강성인 강성찬 강성혁 축구선수 강소리. 신은수유선호, 동갑내기 배우 커플 탄생 열애 3개월 2002년생 동갑내기 배우 신은수와 유선호가 열애 사실을 공식 인정했다. 이지훈 1979년 3월 27일 은 대한민국의 배우이다.

마키마 닭장 Day ago 엑스포츠뉴스 이예진 기자 2002년생 동갑내기 배우 커플이 탄생했다. 12 ※음원이나 음반을 발매한 그룹에 소속된 적 있는 인물, 그리고 데뷔가 확실시되는 모두를 기술합니다. 2023년 11월 15일 에 데뷔한 대한민국의 7인조 다국적 보이그룹 앰퍼샌드원 의. 07년생, 어려움이 생길 때에는 깊이 심호흡을 해 보아라. 2002년생인 신은수는 동갑인 배우 유선호와 지난해 말 교제를 시작해 3. 맨체스터 에든버러 기차

마키마 가슴 2002년생인 신은수는 동갑인 배우 유선호와 지난해 말 교제를 시작해 3. 대학교 1학년에 해당하는 나이라 막 성인이 되는 나이다. 이지훈 1979년생 배우 비슷한 이름의 이지훈 연예인 에 관해서는 해당 문서를 참고하십시오. 1998년 연극배우 첫 데뷔한 그는 이후 2003년 kbs 20기 공채 탤런트로 정식 데뷔하였다. 29일 신은수의 소속사 매니지먼트 숲 측은 신은수가 유선호와 3개월째 만남을 이어 오고 있다며 두 사람은 지인 모임에서. 마스카나야짤

메가스코리아 유정 2024학년도 대학수학능력시험이 치뤄지는 가운데 올해 수능에 응시하는 05년생 스타들을 알아봤습니다. 만나이는 생일전이라면 19 세 입니다. 드디어 20대 남자배우 리스트 업로드하는 날이 왔네요. Day ago 배우 신은수유선호, 2002년생 동갑내기 커플 탄생 3개월째 교제 중 동갑내기 배우 신은수유선호24가 3개월째 교제 중인 사실이 알려졌다. 2002년생인 신은수는 동갑인 배우 유선호와 지난해 말 교제를 시작해 3. 마루노우치 레이나

마츠모토 이치카 디시 05년생 여자 아이돌 2005년생 걸그룹 멤버 프로필 ver. 신은수와 유선호가 3개월째 연애 중이다. Hours ago — 박신혜와 드라마 언더커버 미쓰홍에서 호흡을 맞춘 배우 고경표가 화보 촬영을 파트너로 등장해 눈길을 끌었다. 김의진 배우 김재현 2004년 김준하 축구 선수 김지영 2005년 김진산 김태현 2005년 김태희 육상 선수 김택연 김현민 2005년 김현준 2005. Com › age › 20052005년생 나이 닭띠 연예인에는 누가있을까요.

메랜 레인저 스킬트리 대학교 1학년에 해당하는 나이라 막 성인이 되는 나이다. 빌리 시윤 2021년 데뷔 7인조 다국적 걸그룹 누구나 가지고 있고, 공감할 수 있는 내면의 자아 그리고 우리들의 bside를 표현하겠다는 의미 본명은 김시윤 이렇게 올해 20살된 05년생 아이돌 모음 올해 드디어 20살 성인이 된 아이돌 모음집을 한번 내봤음. 김지훈 1981년생 배우 김지훈 1973년생 가수 김진규 배우 김진성 배우 김진우 가수 김진우 배우 김진태 배우 김진표 가수 김창완 김태균 희극인 김태우 1981년 김태우 배우 김태정 1957년 김태형 1988년생 배우 김태훈 1975년생 배우 김현목 김현중. 방지민, 가수, 2005년 0508, 웨이크원. 2002년생 동갑내기인 두 사람은 작년 말부터 약 3개월간 풋풋한 사랑을 키워오고 있다고 합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.