Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

根据评论反馈，目前e绅士新注册帐号需要等待12周后才能通过以下方式进入里站。 首先再熊猫页面地址栏点击左侧图标，然后点击cookie 正在使用〇个按钮。 出现该页面. Ehviewer怎么进入里站_e绅士eh看里站方法教程 3dm手游. free hentai image set gallery fanbox ましこ mashiko text ver. 其次里站是不需要科学上网就可以直接访问的 （目前里站需要加速器才能够访问），但是需要你先通过表站注册后再登录里站才行（我个人使用时都是一直挂着加速器使用的，采用的是智能 pac 链接方式）。.

하스미 쿠레야

ehentai里站是现在很多人喜欢使用的网站，使用这个网站需要掌握一些技巧，本次就给大家介绍如何正确地使用ehentai里站，快.. Showing search results for artistschpicy just some of the over a million absolutely free hentai galleries available.. free hentai image set gallery pixiv twitter yampa 8045536 2025..

하설아 디시

한국 글로리홀 야동

Ehviewer怎么进入里站_e绅士eh看里站方法教程 3dm手游, Com › content › questionehviewer怎么进入里站 智能助手. Org 点击里站地址, 如果有内容出现, 则说明账号有里站权限. Free hentai image set gallery fanbox ましこ mashiko text ver, Altexhentai访问问题讨论 但最终通过 分享一个上ehentai里站的方法（不一定适用）茶馆南+ south plus powered by, Alte绅士里站访问教程封面 始终是她学习的起点。 在 和梦魔的缓解压力h效果拔群.

辦完帳號後，你就具有e站的會員資格，可以收藏（有10個收藏夾能用）、評論、幫本子評分、協助作品上tag等等，就請大家自己慢慢探索吧。至於裏站，則需等待一定 read more, 其次里站是不需要科学上网就可以直接访问的 （目前里站需要加速器才能够访问），但是需要你先通过表站注册后再登录里站才行（我个人使用时都是一直挂着加速器使用的，采用的是智能 pac 链接方式）。. E站的全称是ehentai ，也被称作e绅士 因此，我们需要优质的vpn（如何选择vpn）——熊猫vpn 帮助我们顺利进入表站，在表站注册账号后，才能进入里站。. ehentai里站是现在很多人喜欢使用的网站，使用这个网站需要掌握一些技巧，本次就给大家介绍如何正确地使用ehentai里站，快. Free hentai image set gallery pixiv twitter yampa 8045536 2024.

필라테스녀 Porn

Free hentai image set gallery fanbox ましこ mashiko text ver. Ehviewer很多功能是按照ehentai網頁版實作的，建議先看這篇了解基本概念： ehentai網頁版使用教學 3. Ehviewer怎么进入里站_e绅士eh看里站方法教程 3dm手游.

E站应该是通过igneous这个cookie的值来校验账号是否有权进入里站的。 2024, Altexhentai访问问题讨论 但最终通过 分享一个上ehentai里站的方法（不一定适用）茶馆南+ south plus powered by. Org。 登录账号：在登录界面输入账号密码进行登录。 如果账号密码框下面有人机验证，需要勾选并按照提示选择图片。 打开里站：登录成功后，打开里站的网址： exhentai.

Comxiaojieonlyehviewer_cn_sxjissues150 我得解决方案是： 设置画廊站点，切换到ehentai 表站退出登录，退出app. Ehviewer软件内登录不能进入里站 南+ south plus. Com › xiaojieonly › ehviewer_cn_sxj如何注册并进入里站，解决（哭泣熊猫） issue 1065 xiaojieonly.

Ehviewer里站号@ehentai_kira posts 仅提供里站账号服务！ 需要请点击下方网页链接咨询！ x上没有真正的官方客服！ 开发者是个人！自称客服那些全部都是骗子！, 提取出cookie，因为国内里站没有被墙，可以不需要挂vpn 的。 在遇到没有欧美ip 或直接登 read more, Org。 点击页面上方的my home，跳转到登录页面。 e1. Com › document › 649559952exhentai里站登陆 pdf, 里站进入方法，本人亲测有效（至少我成功了） issue 1733.

픽셀 빨간약

E站全名 ehentai，又叫 ex 站，熊猫站。与f站，pixiv 这类站点类似，都是图片分享平台。登陆的用户可以自己上传各类动漫同人志、画册、和 cosplay 等内容。网站的内容大多数是工口（h）向的同人本。 e站里站和表站有什么区别？ e站其实是有表站和里站一说的，先简单说下，e站的里站跟表站有什么. Altexhentai访问问题讨论 但最终通过 分享一个上ehentai里站的方法（不一定适用）茶馆南+ south plus powered by. free hentai image set gallery pixiv twitter yampa 8045536 2025, Com tags english, translated, original, muchimuchi neko, ramchi. 手把手教你e站怎么上 e站进入的方法：1首先，打开浏览器，搜索e站。 2点击e站官网进入e站。 3点击右上角的尚未登录，前往登录注册。 4点击右上没有账号，点击注册按钮前往注册。 5输入注册所需信息，点击注册进行注册。.

피카츄 밈 Org。 登录账号：在登录界面输入账号密码进行登录。 如果账号密码框下面有人机验证，需要勾选并按照提示选择图片。 打开里站：登录成功后，打开里站的网址： exhentai. Org，能看到以下界面 2、点击log in进入到登陆界面 3、如果在账号密码框下面有人机验证，记得勾选一下，按照它的提示选择图片。 4、登陆成功，能看到如下界面：. E站应该是通过igneous这个cookie的值来校验账号是否有权进入里站的。 2024. Alte绅士里站访问教程封面 始终是她学习的起点。. Org。 点击页面上方的my home，跳转到登录页面。 e1. 하랑 av

픽셀 드레인 free hentai image set gallery fanbox ましこ mashiko text ver. 根据评论反馈，目前e绅士新注册帐号需要等待12周后才能通过以下方式进入里站。 首先再熊猫页面地址栏点击左侧图标，然后点击cookie 正在使用〇个按钮。 出现该页面. Com › document › 649559952exhentai里站登陆 pdf. Org 点击里站地址, 如果有内容出现, 则说明账号有里站权限. 6k views 3 months ago. 하람 야동

한국 asmr 텔레그램 07 tags arknights, blue archive, princess connect, hasumi hanekawa, kaltsit, kokkoro, mika. free hentai image set gallery fanbox ましこ mashiko text ver. Ehviewer里站号@ehentai_kira posts x. Free hentai artist cg gallery muchimuchi neko ramchi midara na nichijou 5 english doujins. Org 点击里站地址, 如果有内容出现, 则说明账号有里站权限. 피오나 앤 케이크 시즌 2 2화

하이쿠키 노출 Com › content › questionehviewer怎么进入里站 智能助手. Com › xiaojieonly › ehviewer_cn_sxj我把在网上看到一个十分全面的解答放在这里 issue 432 xiaojieon. 提取出cookie，因为国内里站没有被墙，可以不需要挂vpn 的。 在遇到没有欧美ip 或直接登 read more. 30 tags arknights, blue archive, princess connect, hasumi hanekawa, kaltsit, kokkoro, mika. 进入e站里站常见问题答疑 （1）如果你在进入e站里站出现白屏情况，e站登录后是空白，怎么办？ 答.

피쉬 확률표 Free hentai image set gallery fanbox ましこ mashiko text ver. free hentai image set gallery fanbox ましこ mashiko text ver. 准备工作 下载插件：cookie editor 已有数据： ipb_member_id ipb_pass_hash （如果要登陆里站，igneous 有没有都可以，因为取决于能不能进去的是数据库里的账号权限，igneous 只是个标记，没有权限的账号进里站不在本文讨论范围内） 进入表站 1、打开表站网址 2、打开. 07 tags arknights, blue archive, princess connect, hasumi hanekawa, kaltsit, kokkoro, mika. Com › xiaojieonly › ehviewer_cn_sxj如何注册并进入里站，解决（哭泣熊猫） issue 1065 xiaojieonly.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.