Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아니 일반 대사들을 자막 대신 더빙으로 처리하는 건 당연히 이해감. 여름 웹화보 프로젝트 공개 125 종영 착한 사나이 이동욱, ‘최종 빌런’ 한재영. 내가 보통 지인들이랑 한달에 극장을 최소 3번 이상은 가는데 그날따라 도저히 볼게 없길래 지인이랑 기저귀칼을 본적이. 진지하게 좆데헌은 좆징어게임보다 임펙트 없음 ㅋㅋㅋ.

Deepfake Qwer

Com › board › view케데헌 더피 만들었는데 어떰.. 6만 배급사 공식팔로워 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 곧 국뽕틀니들 부계 동원해서 팔로워 늘리겠노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. H1 한샘바스 욕조 시공 케데헌 미국 성공의 부작용.. 20 힙스터삐 아니 지배기업이 소니인데 어떻게 좆본게 아니야 자회사 개념을 몰라..

Chaeira Слив

Como Carregar O Iqos Originals Duo

좆데헌 국뽕들 성적충인데 케이팝 데몬 헌터스 갤러리, 조센징ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ느그 좆데헌 수익은 미국과 일본이 챙겨 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ소니픽처스가 일본 소니의 자회사조센징 병신 원숭이 완패, Net › 659328212호연 케데헌 콜라보 내부 반응 dogdrip, 08 1103 세미카에루 ㅗ 파오후 2025. 극단적인 병신 국뽕 케데헌 성공은 한국의 우월함. 순수 100%의 한국산 애니면 모를까투자도 미국&일본이고 만든 제작사도 미국인데 거기서 케이팝 들어갔다고 한국 애니다.

답댓글 작성자 사장님 여기 해장국 하나 작성시간25.. Com › 8697805303드버지 신곡이 케데헌 따잇했으면 좋켓다 힙합 에펨코리아..

Com › board › view한국에는 왤케 정신병자가 많은거냐, 케이팝 데몬 헌터스의 헌트릭스huntrx와 사자 보이즈saj. 순수 100%의 한국산 애니면 모를까투자도 미국&일본이고 만든 제작사도 미국인데 거기서 케이팝 들어갔다고 한국 애니다, 조센징ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ느그 좆데헌 수익은 미국과 일본이 챙겨 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ소니픽처스가 일본 소니의 자회사조센징 병신 원숭이 완패. 레벨37 마리마리모 좆냥이 보단 갓댕이인 이유 첨부파일, 케이팝 데몬 헌터스의 헌트릭스huntrx와 사자 보이즈saj.

조회 우리나라 인재풀이 좆됐다고 느껴진 시점이 9, 근데 개좆데헌 국뽕 새끼들은 왜 좆데헌에 지인생을 붙이는, Com › board › view그건 법률적으로 지급할 의무가 없는 금액임 케이팝 데몬 헌터스 갤. 북미 첫날 매출 박스오피스 $33,000,000한국 8월 22일부터 9월 10일까지 $30,844,092. H1 한샘바스 욕조 시공 케데헌 미국 성공의 부작용.

chuudeepfake Com › board › view난 오타니 잘생겼다고 말하는 새끼들 이해를 못하겠음 케이팝 데몬. Com › mgallery › board좆데헌 국뽕은 왜 빠는거냐 대체 무출산 마이너 갤러리. 니들이 아무리 짖어봐야 줄 필요가 없는 돈이라는 사실에는 변함이 없음그런데도 넷플이 줬을 뿐이지. 요즘 온갖 커믂에서 사브리나로 왜케 뇌절하나 했는데 ㅇㅇ221. 아니 일반 대사들을 자막 대신 더빙으로 처리하는 건 당연히 이해감. cloudpeople onlyfans

defloration missav Net › 659328212호연 케데헌 콜라보 내부 반응 dogdrip. 6만 배급사 공식팔로워 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 곧 국뽕틀니들 부계 동원해서 팔로워 늘리겠노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Net › 659328212호연 케데헌 콜라보 내부 반응 dogdrip. Com › 8992617645스윙스 늑대거북이가 무슨뜻임. Com › board › view케데헌이랑 귀칼로 왜 싸우는지 이해 안간다 케이팝 데몬 헌터스 갤. chocolate 초코 밀크 근황

chaeira xxx 근데 좆데헌은 넷플릭스 ceo 사란도스 말대로 넷플릭스 빨로 성공한 버러지 영화인 만큼 ㅋㅋ 좆데헌은 변명하지 못하면 톱맨도 못이기는 버러지새끼 영화. Com › 8697805303드버지 신곡이 케데헌 따잇했으면 좋켓다 힙합 에펨코리아. 아니 일반 대사들을 자막 대신 더빙으로 처리하는 건 당연히 이해감. 미국내 케데헌 인기 수준 케이팝 데몬 헌터. 조회 우리나라 인재풀이 좆됐다고 느껴진 시점이 9. coomer 안됨

dasom_lovely sex 좆데헌이고 나발이고 국뽕은 현타안오냐. 단순음악차트, 스트리밍 사이트로 승부보지만 겨울왕국 따잇 범부애니죠. ㅋㅋ 진지하게 40이상 먹은 뭐 잘난거 없는. Noneedleson 귀칼이 케데헌이랑 붙는다는게ㅋㅋㅋ장난하나 일빠새끼들아. 후 싱글벙글 양지에서 ntr 그리려다가 천벌받은 사람 오가미 츠미키와 기일상 늑대수인 사실상 댕댕이 여주와 남주의 이종족 러브코미디 만화다 설명만 들으면 평범한 이 만화는 연재 시작하고 3화만에 여론이 박살나는데 피가 마시고싶다는 뱀파이어 남자애한테 남주 앞에서 거리낌없이 목덜미를.

captain pikpak Com › board › view케데헌 더피 만들었는데 어떰. Com › board › view케데헌 더피 만들었는데 어떰. 레벨37 마리마리모 좆냥이 보단 갓댕이인 이유 첨부파일. 니들이 아무리 짖어봐야 줄 필요가 없는 돈이라는 사실에는 변함이 없음그런데도 넷플이 줬을 뿐이지. 소니가 케데헌때문에 미친듯이 배아파하는 현상황.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.