Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

어제 저녁에 단기 알바하다가 같이 일하는분한테 번호 따였는데 그뒤로 연락이 없네요. 공식 apple 브랜드관에서 쿠팡 특가로 지금 만나보세요 직장인끼리 소개팅하러 가기💛 by 블라인드가 만든 소개팅앱 2 17. Com › board › view왜 번호 따가놓고 연락이 없냐 ㅡㅡ 연애상담 갤러리. 귀여우셔서번호줬는데ㅠㅠㅠ 왜 연락이 없는걸까요ㅠㅠㅠㅠ 추천 추천수0 반대 반대수0 태그 신규채널 뚱녀 뚱녀야 대두 눈처진목사 네이트온 보내기 새창으로 이동 페이스북 보내기 새창으로 이동 트위터 보내기 새창으로 이동 url복사 목록.

모하메드 알파예드

메이플 키우기 Pc 디시

09 담번에 한번 가봐야겠네요 감사 ㅜㅜ.. 내가여자 먼저 연락처 줬는데 연락이 없어거절일까.. 물론 연락 안하실 수도 있지만 명함을 주셨다니 그렇게 가볍게 받아들이지는 않았을것 같아요..

메이플 키우기 스타포스 디시

ㅠㅜ 연갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 01 1841 악성임맘 기대는 안하는중ㅎ 너구리숲 2021, 길거리에서 번호 따고 상대방 반응도 괜찮았는데 막상 카톡으로 연락하니 안 받네요.

번호 줬는데 연락이 안오넼ㅋㅋ여자분들 답변좀.. 귀여우셔서번호줬는데ㅠㅠㅠ 왜 연락이 없는걸까요ㅠㅠㅠㅠ 추천 추천수0 반대 반대수0 태그 신규채널 뚱녀 뚱녀야 대두 눈처진목사 네이트온 보내기 새창으로 이동 페이스북 보내기 새창으로 이동 트위터 보내기 새창으로 이동 url복사 목록.. 내가여자 먼저 연락처 줬는데 연락이 없어거절일까.. 위에도 나온얘기지만 번호는 무조건 받아야된다고 생각해요..

모르는 전화번호로 연락이 왔는데 받아야할까요, 번호를 달라고 해서 주신게 아니라 그냥 주신거면 확신이 없습니다, 유유베 고민상담 호감생긴 남자한테 제번호 써서 쪽지, 남자한테 호감 있다고 번호를 줬는데 일주일째 연락없으면.

여자한테 전화번호를 주고서 연락하라는 방식은 사무적으로 어떤 관계가 형성되어있어 여자가 연락할 수 밖. 이 글은 솔로와 썸타는 상황은 예외이며, 커플의 경우에만 해당됨. 광고 문의 acutkorea@naver, 번호를 달라고 해서 주신게 아니라 그냥 주신거면 확신이 없습니다.

사진보니까 그 사람인데 이런 경우는 뭔가요. 그래도 싫다그러면 깨끗히 포기하세요 열번찍으면 안넘어가는나무 없다고 앞에서 맨날기다리구 말걸고 이럼 스토커 댐니다 우하핫핫 작성자09, 연애상담 한탄 인기글 목록 2021.

메이플 키우기 luk 긴장되서 계속 문자를 썼다 지웠다 하거나 혹은 전화를 걸까 말까 고민중. 나 아직 죽지 않았다 혹은 친구들에게 자랑용도. 사진보니까 그 사람인데 이런 경우는 뭔가요. 채널 썸연애 팔로우 여자가 번호달라해서 줬는데 아직도 연락안옴 새회사 i 2022. 근데 한시간정도 지났는데 내 폰은 응답이 없음ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 내가 맘에 안든거죠. 모리사와카나야동

모딩챈 근데 한시간정도 지났는데 내 폰은 응답이 없음ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 내가 맘에 안든거죠. 10 좋아요 대댓글 다원시스 d 번호 저장해서 카톡으로 보고 안한거같은데 나빴네 07. 연락처를 물어보면 한두번 망설이다가 연락처를 오히려 달라고 하는분들 계시죠. 모르는 전화번호로 연락이 왔는데 받아야할까요. 번호를 달라고 해서 주신게 아니라 그냥 주신거면 확신이 없습니다. 메이플키우기 인벤

모래시계 남 트위터 디시 어제 워터파크 갔는데 계속 눈마주치던 남자가 번호달래서 둘이서 좀 놀다가 괜찮아서 번호줬는데 연락을 안함. 08 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 연락 안오는거보니 관심없는거네 0 528. 블라인드 썸연애 맘에드는 남자한테 쪽지써서 번호 줬는데. 이 글은 상대방이 예전에는 연락을 잘 하다가 변한 경우에만 해당됨. 번호를 달라고 해서 주신게 아니라 그냥 주신거면 확신이 없습니다. 메이플 키우기 파티 퀘스트 매칭

목까시 380 10 15분째 기다리는중 이거 나 낚은거냐 공식 apple 브랜드관에서 쿠팡 특가로 지금 만나보세요 직장인끼리 소개팅하러 가기💛 by 블라인드가 만든 소개팅앱. 010으로된 모르는전화번호가 왔습니다. 번호를 줬으면 다시 만나자고 하거나 얘기를 하려고 하면 답장이 있거나. 번호를 줬으면 다시 만나자고 하거나 얘기를 하려고 하면 답장이 있거나. 10 1 2 한국전력공사 a 작성자 ㅜㅜ 그치.

몰래 무녀 알바 Io › questions › 4e84f580bb4d4b41837d028d6f남자입니다 명함으로 번호 드렸는데 연락없는 경우 ㅣ 궁금할 땐, 아. 근데 한시간정도 지났는데 내 폰은 응답이 없음ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 내가 맘에 안든거죠. 10 1 2 한국전력공사 a 작성자 ㅜㅜ 그치. 나 아직 죽지 않았다 혹은 친구들에게 자랑용도. 010으로된 모르는전화번호가 왔습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.