퐁귀 바이럴아님 바이럴이면 내계정 공개아이디로 뿌리고 테접함.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › @ponggwi퐁귀 youtube. 지하철에서 화장하는 여자의 밀착 디시가 화제. 퐁귀 골반이 안멈추는데 어떡해 9화 초아 마이너 갤러리. Kr › misc › 118646835골반통신 밈 의미는.

Com › K_159500 › 224045758474요즘 유행 골반통신 골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해 밈 시작은 퐁귀.

영상 퐁귀 골반이 안멈추는데 어떡해 9화.

‘병맛의 정교화’라는 새로운 스타일을 만들어냈다, 모든 사진출처 퐁귀 인스타그램 요즘 인스타그램과 틱톡에서 골반이 안 멈춰요 골반춤으로. Com › @ponggwi퐁귀 youtube.

골반이 멈추지 않아 밈, 퐁귀, aoa 팬플러스. Com › k_159500 › 224045758474요즘 유행 골반통신 골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해 밈 시작은 퐁귀. 골반밈 영상은 다 aoa 짧은치마 노래를 bgm으로 진행되는데요. 501 likes, 20 comments mokwoo_finearts on octo 입시가 끝나질 않아 내 골반이 멈추지 않는탓일까, 이게 바로 최근 mz세대 사이에서 폭발적으로 유행 중인 ‘골반통신 밈’이에요, 여러 인스타그램 계정들이 골반이안멈추는데어떡해, 퐁귀챌린지 등의 해시태그로 패러디 영상을 올리고 있어요.

Com › channel › ucfmtcg4w0rls8h1jkvqpepw퐁귀 youtube. 골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해 @ponggwi 퐁귀님 영상 패러디 ver. 퐁귀 바이럴아님 바이럴이면 내계정 공개아이디로 뿌리고 테접함. 미친 짬지털 수북해서 좌우정렬될 나이 먹은년이 미친. Nayeon @nayeonk96 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 짧은 치마에 골반이 멈추지 않는 매력을 알아보세요.

골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해 @ponggwi 퐁귀님 영상 패러디 ver. 그래서인지 골반 밈영상은 조회수도 어마어마함. Com › @ponggwi › featured퐁귀 youtube.

퐁귀 인스타그램 골반 영상 조회수도 어마어마하죠.

501 likes, 20 comments mokwoo_finearts on octo 입시가 끝나질 않아 내 골반이 멈추지 않는탓일까, – 퐁귀식 자기합리화의 정점 이 대사들은 모두 밈으로 따로 퍼지며, 각종 커뮤니티와 댓글창에서 그대로 패러디되고 있다, 골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해 1화1 픽션입니다. Com › entry › 퐁귀골반통신퐁귀 골반통신 밈이 뭐길래, 모든 사진출처 퐁귀 인스타그램 요즘 인스타그램과 틱톡에서 골반이 안 멈춰요 골반춤으로. 💃🏻골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해 연재 중💃🏻 🌌퐁귀 세계관으로 퐁퐁🌌 📧business@agent.

퐁귀의 과거썰 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.. 246k likes, 2851 comments ponggwi on octo 골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해 1화..

26 1958 blgbin 디시에서 식객민우 ㅋㅋㅋ 같은거지 뭐. 아냐 그림을 완성못해서 그런거같아 퐁귀 릴스 골반통신 골반통신이상감지 이상감지 aoa 미술학원 학원일상 일상 미술학원 미술 미대입시 입시 입시미술 입시스타그램 일상공유 선팔. 퐁귀 골반이 안멈추는데 어떡해 9화 초아 마이너 갤러리.

모든 사진출처 퐁귀 인스타그램 요즘 인스타그램과 틱톡에서 골반이 안 멈춰요 골반춤으로.

걸어다니면서 화장하는 영상에서는 단발 화장부터 메이크업까지 촬영돼요. Nayeon @nayeonk96 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 짧은 치마에 골반이 멈추지 않는 매력을 알아보세요. 2025년 가을, 틱톡과 유튜브 숏츠, 그리고 x 구 트위터에서 갑자기 모든 이의 골반이 흔들리기 시작했습니다. Aoa 짧은 치마 inst까지 역주행한 이유. 그래서인지 골반 밈영상은 조회수도 어마어마함, 아냐 그림을 완성못해서 그런거같아 퐁귀 릴스 골반통신 골반통신이상감지 이상감지 aoa 미술학원 학원일상 일상 미술학원 미술 미대입시 입시 입시미술 입시스타그램 일상공유 선팔.

골반이 안 멈춰서 차인 여자😭 아니 이런 아이디어는 대체 어디서 얻어서 시작하는 걸까요.. Com@longkuiki 끠끼 팬카페 scafe.. Kr › misc › 118646835골반통신 밈 의미는.. 퐁귀 바이럴아님 바이럴이면 내계정 공개아이디로 뿌리고 테접함..

골반이 멈추지 않아 밈, 퐁귀, Aoa 팬플러스.

도대체 sns가 이 리듬에 중독된 이유💬 요즘 인스타그램이나 틱톡을 스크롤하다 보면 골반이 멈추지 않아라는 문구,한 번쯤은 보셨을 거예요. 퐁귀 골반이멈추지않는병 이찬오빠 멋있어 오리지널 사운드 타이위, 퐁귀 골반이멈추지않는병 이찬오빠 멋있어 오리지널 사운드 타이위.

델로략국 트월킹 그게 ‘골반이 멈추지 않아 밈’으로 불리며 퍼졌고, ‘골반통신’이 파생된 형태예요. Days ago 이슈 어제 알게된 소식 골반통신 퐁귀는 01년생 803 4. 골반이 안 멈춰서 차인 여자😭 아니 이런 아이디어는 대체 어디서 얻어서 시작하는 걸까요. Com › @nurungji › video골반이 멈추지 않는 챌린지. 퐁귀 바이럴아님 바이럴이면 내계정 공개아이디로 뿌리고 테접함. 디시 ㅋㄹ 개발

디시 유레이 2025년 가을, 틱톡과 유튜브 숏츠, 그리고 x 구 트위터에서 갑자기 모든 이의 골반이 흔들리기 시작했습니다. 골반이 멈추지 않아 밈, 퐁귀, aoa 팬플러스. Pov 인플루언서 진입장벽 느끼고 다시 출근하는 나 😮‍💨pov 뷰스타 코덕 코덕스타그램 뷰티밈 해외밈 퐁귀 골반통신 da_beautye 3. 뇌절도 꾸준하게하면 예술이구나를 배웟음 다른 뇌절노래도 많으심 구경 고고혓. 걸어다니면서 화장하는 영상에서는 단발 화장부터 메이크업까지 촬영돼요. 도쿄 스튜디오 임대

둥지언니 논란 디시 일반 근데 그놈의 골반이 멈추지 않는 뭐시기는 대체 뭐임. 언니들 골반 진짜로 흔들어봐 재밋긔 테일즈런너 갤러리. 골반통신 이상 감지, oo 모드 전환. 일반 골반통신 원본보니까 존나 꾸준하게 뇌절하셨더라. Pov 인플루언서 진입장벽 느끼고 다시 출근하는 나 😮‍💨pov 뷰스타 코덕 코덕스타그램 뷰티밈 해외밈 퐁귀 골반통신 da_beautye 3. 데카트론 모자 디시

디시 아사 크리에이터 퐁귀@ponggwi가 연재 중인 ‘골반이 안 멈추는데 어떡해’ 릴스 시리즈에서 시작된 이 트렌드는 aoa의 ‘짧은 치마’, 그리고 중독성 강한 골반 춤으로 화제를 모으고. Nayeon @nayeonk96 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 짧은 치마에 골반이 멈추지 않는 매력을 알아보세요. 님들요즘이게유행이라고함내골반이멈추지않아 만화 갤러리. 골반이 안 멈춰서 차인 여자😭 아니 이런 아이디어는 대체 어디서 얻어서 시작하는 걸까요. 영상 퐁귀 골반이 안멈추는데 어떡해 9화.

드라마 애마 좌표 Days ago 이슈 어제 알게된 소식 골반통신 퐁귀는 01년생 803 4. Com › @ponggwi › featured퐁귀 youtube. 언니들 골반 진짜로 흔들어봐 재밋긔 테일즈런너 갤러리. 님들요즘이게유행이라고함내골반이멈추지않아 만화 갤러리. World 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 이 재미있는 골반 챌린지를 함께 즐겨보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.