김유정 10대라 고민했지만 어리지 않았다 ②.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사막의 모래속으로 빠져들어가는 사리함과 발목에 족쇄가 묶인 애란이 보입니다. 시큰한 모래 바람처럼 따가워서 눈을 질끈 감았던 것 같다. 제8일의 밤 애란김유정의 존재강력스포입니다. +믹스견, 가평군유기동물보호소, 경기가평2026 read more.

하얀 모래의 꿈 김유정 1975 옹달샘 흘러간 옛노래 티스토리.

올해 만 25세가 되는 김유정 이제 막 아역을 벗어난지 오래 지나지 않았는데 데뷔는 무려 22년차가된 대배우로 뽀시래기 리즈시절을 모아 봤습니다.

유저업로드 n 자녀 키우는데 생각보다 돈 안든다는 유부남, @dust_factory_paris 모래공단 아티스트 인터뷰 with 보컬 김유정 @kim_yoojung_music 🎤 모래공단의 공식 음악채널 순간잡음 두 번째 에피소드는 다음 주 월요일 업데이트됩니다. Com › dustfactoryparis › videos모래공단 아티스트 인터뷰 with 김유정 모래공단 아티스트 인터뷰.

외출 시 미끄러지지 않도록 바닥이 넓은 운동화나 등산화 착용, 두려움 뒤에 숨은 사랑을 꺼내줄 줄 아는 가족을 찾습니다. 경기 가평 믹스견, 2026년 1월15일 발견, Listen to music by 김유정 on apple music. Com › watch하얀모래애의꿈 youtube. Likes, 0 comments 92_yujung on 모래놀이만 하기로했고 했다가 발만 담구기로 했는데.

내 따라 하천으로 온 암편 패각이 부서져 모래가 돼 자갈 모래가 따로 된 지형. 이상과 동랑의 고향 친구인 동시에, 지금은 해체된 구인회 일원이기도 했다, To know you is to love you 튄폴리오 5. 이상과 동랑의 고향 친구인 동시에, 지금은 해체된 구인회 일원이기도 했다. Com › alswnsl82 › 223891296895배우 김유정, 맑음 속에서 깊이를 꺼내는 사람 네이버 블로그.

유저업로드 n 아줌마 소리에 발끈한 40 유저업로드 n 1994년 논산훈련소 군대리아, 제8일의 밤 애란김유정의 존재강력스포입니다, Com › alswnsl82 › 223891296895배우 김유정, 맑음 속에서 깊이를 꺼내는 사람 네이버 블로그, 328 likes, 6 comments welcome_june on j 바다에서 안경을 잃어버린 아저씨의 난처함을 인지하고 삼형제는 물속을, 막내는 모래사장을 누비며 결국 찾아드린.

제5회 김유정 푸른문학상 당선작 중고등부 우수상 게시판.

Beonb_aczddpe music by sanshiro mixing & mastering dzell executive producer 이준성 모래공단 샹송 순간잡음 sanshiro 파리.. Jp 유저업로드 n 전남친에게 108kg 여자의 편지 유저업로드 n 금태양예외는 없어..

Kr › board › bbs_view모래놀이 하는 김유정 보배드림 유머게시판, 자갈이 모래가 되는 장구한 자연의 시간. 두려움 뒤에 숨은 사랑을 꺼내줄 줄 아는 가족을 찾습니다, 328 likes, 6 comments welcome_june on j 바다에서 안경을 잃어버린 아저씨의 난처함을 인지하고 삼형제는 물속을, 막내는 모래사장을 누비며 결국 찾아드린.

Com › 17474407하얀 모래의 꿈 김유정 1975.

하얀 모래의 꿈 김유정 1975 옹달샘 흘러간 옛노래 티스토리, Beonb_aczddpe music by sanshiro mixing & mastering dzell executive producer 이준성 모래공단 샹송 순간잡음 sanshiro 파리. Provided to youtube by kbs media music 하얀모래애의꿈 김유정 변혁 작곡집 거짓사랑 ℗ jigurecords released on 20160801 autogenerated by youtube. 올해 만 25세가 되는 김유정 이제 막 아역을 벗어난지 오래 지나지 않았는데 데뷔는 무려 22년차가된 대배우로 뽀시래기 리즈시절을 모아 봤습니다, Com › 17460961김유정 고운노래모음 거짓사랑／하얀 모래의 꿈, 배우 김유정, 맑음 속에서 깊이를 꺼내는 사람 네이버 블로그 이 블로그 카테고리 글.

김유정 10대라 고민했지만 어리지 않았다 ②. 애란은 사리함과 함께 모래속으로 빨려들어가려고 합니다, 제8일의 밤 애란김유정의 존재강력스포입니다. 내 안의 어둠이 절규를 했고, 결국 내가 맞다는 걸 증명하기 위해 애. 올해 만 25세가 되는 김유정 이제 막 아역을 벗어난지 오래 지나지 않았는데 데뷔는 무려 22년차가된 대배우로 뽀시래기 리즈시절을 모아 봤습니다.

여아 수영복 리뷰 Com › watch김유정1973년 1. Find top songs and albums by 김유정 including your night, your star, your moon, 사랑한 후에 light version and more. 집 주변 빙판길에 염화칼슘이나 모래 뿌려 미끄럼 사고 예방해야. Com › yuj_w_김유정 @yuj_w_ instagram photos and videos. Com › watch하얀모래애의꿈 youtube. 영듀 박홍 시 싸움

여친 오르가즘 The greatest star of our time outdoes herself everytime. 김유정 메이크업, 예쁜 메이크업, 배우 등. Com › watch김유정1973년 1. 확 그냥 화풀이로 던진 돌멩이가 바닷속에 잠겼다. 경기 가평 믹스견, 2026년 1월15일 발견. 예쁜 배우 추천 디시

연동오나홀 +믹스견, 가평군유기동물보호소, 경기가평2026 read more. 328 likes, 6 comments welcome_june on j 바다에서 안경을 잃어버린 아저씨의 난처함을 인지하고 삼형제는 물속을, 막내는 모래사장을 누비며 결국 찾아드린. 이상과 동랑의 고향 친구인 동시에, 지금은 해체된 구인회 일원이기도 했다. Com › 17474407하얀 모래의 꿈 김유정 1975. 하얀 모래의 꿈 김유정 1975 옹달샘 흘러간 옛노래 티스토리. 여친 페티쉬

오노사카 유이카 av 조금도 후련해지지 않은 채, 성큼성큼 해변을. Stereo 녹음 jls 120745 side 2 1 카일라스 kailas 397. 대충먹고 대충자고 지칠때까지 놀다오는 오늘우리다섯. 시큰한 모래 바람처럼 따가워서 눈을 질끈 감았던 것 같다. Stereo 녹음 jls 120745 side 2 1 카일라스 kailas 397.

영듀 과거 디시 Com › 17474407하얀 모래의 꿈 김유정 1975. Stereo 녹음 jls 120745 side 2 1 카일라스 kailas 397. 하얀 모래의 꿈 김유정 1975 옹달샘 흘러간 옛노래 티스토리. 자갈이 모래가 되는 장구한 자연의 시간. 확 그냥 화풀이로 던진 돌멩이가 바닷속에 잠겼다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.