Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

좆같았던 하루를 끝내고 집에 돌아와 박스를 열면온갖 아름다운 향기가 들어있는 보석 같은 동끼딱사가 들어있다노. 아무리 봐도 178의 길이감 아닌거 같은데. 킬리안 음바페 프로필 킬리안 음바페 로탱 kylian mbappé lottin 출생1998년 12월 20일, 일드프랑스 파리 뷔트쇼몽구 국적프랑스 국적이며, 카메룬과 알제리 국기도 언급됨 키 178cm 체중 75kg 포지션 윙어, 스트라이커 주발오른발 양발 가능 등번호프랑스 대표팀 10 파리 생제르맹 fc 7 소속. 10 레알 마드리드 페이지로 이동 출생 1998.

Horny Mama By Sanjuurou

Heart Gold 4780 영문 롬

킬리안 음바페의 파리 생제르망 fc 에서의 마지막 시즌이자 리그 1 에서의 마지막 시즌이다, 그리즈만이 176인데 저정도면 34센치 차인가. 내가 조금더크고 몸무게비슷한데 대구빡이 작아서그런지 나보다비율 훨좋아보이네.

Hentai Chae

Com › 7264682790오피셜 음바페 키 180cm 몸무게 81kg으로 변경 해외축구 에펨코.. 현재 라리가의 레알 마드리드와 프랑스 축구 국가대표팀에서 활동하고 있으며 현재 프랑스 대표팀 주장을 맡고있다..

16 1847 이번 월드컵에서도 슈제츠니가 저거랑 똑같이 낚였잖아 당연히 파포스트 각이어서 슈제츠니도 약간 움직여서 예측하고 있었는데 니어로 까버림 미친놈임. 요즘 갤에서 음바페 떡밥이 은근 활발하길래 칼럼 가져왔다, 음바페 키 큰거 맞는거 같은데 이풋볼 마이너 갤러리.

Hitom Gender

202211202404 해외축구 갤러리. Net › player › primera킬리안 음바페 다음스포츠. 킬리안 음바페 음바페의 본명은 킬리안 음바페 로탱 kylian mbappé lottin입니다. 음바페 신체가 그동안 나온 스피드스타랑은 좀 다른거 같지. Com › board › view음바페 키 182 맞는듯 2021020520221125 해외축구 갤러리. 본 인물의 동생이자 losc 릴 소속의 축구 선수에 대한 내용은 에단 음바페 문서를 참고하십시오.

Hitomi Ntr Kr

내가 조금더크고 몸무게비슷한데 대구빡이 작아서그런지 나보다비율 훨좋아보이네, Com › board › view벤피카에게 4대2 당하는 레알gif 실시간 베스트 갤러리, 킬리안 음바페 의 202223 시즌의 활약을 서술한 문서이다, 202211202404 해외축구 갤러리. 음바페는 5피트 10인치인데 발이 당시 12인치로 정의되었고 지금은 10인치로 재정의되면서 키가 6피트로 재분류되었어, 2027세 급여 13 182cm 75kg 보통고유 등번호 10번 4.

킬리안 음바페 프로필 킬리안 음바페 로탱 kylian mbappé lottin 출생1998년 12월 20일, 일드프랑스 파리 뷔트쇼몽구 국적프랑스 국적이며, 카메룬과 알제리 국기도 언급됨 키 178cm 체중 75kg 포지션 윙어, 스트라이커 주발오른발 양발 가능 등번호프랑스 대표팀 10 파리 생제르맹 fc 7 소속. 프리시즌과 이적설 2022년 5월 28일 칸 영화제. 현재 라리가의 레알 마드리드와 프랑스 축구 국가대표팀에서 활동하고 있으며 현재 프랑스 대표팀 주장을 맡고있다. Nba 샌안토니오 스퍼스 소속의 프랑스 국적 농구 선수. 해당 인물의 최근 활약상에 대한 내용에 대한 내용은 킬리안 음바페202526 시즌 문서를 참고하십시오.

오피셜 음바페 키 180cm 몸무게 81kg으로 변경. 킬리안 음바페 프로필 킬리안 음바페 로탱 kylian mbappé lottin 출생1998년 12월 20일, 일드프랑스 파리 뷔트쇼몽구 국적프랑스 국적이며, 카메룬과 알제리 국기도 언급됨 키 178cm 체중 75kg 포지션 윙어, 스트라이커 주발오른발 양발 가능 등번호프랑스 대표팀 10 파리 생제르맹 fc 7 소속. 10 레알 마드리드 페이지로 이동 출생 1998, 음바페 신체가 그동안 나온 스피드스타랑은 좀 다른거 같지.

hitomi.la 드래곤볼 킬리안 음바페 의 202223 시즌의 활약을 서술한 문서이다. 키대비 다리가 ㅈㄴ긴게 무게중심이나 무릎. 음바페 키 큰거 맞는거 같은데 이풋볼 마이너 갤러리. 물론 이렇다고 음바페 키 무조건 바뀐다. Days ago 음바페 선제골 벤피카 추격골 벤피카 역전골 벤피카 추가골 음바페 멀티골 아센시오 퇴장 호드리구도 골키퍼 공 뺏다가 퇴장 벤피카 쐐기골 기뻐하는 무버지 역시 스페셜 원. hitomi 青柳かぼた

hitomila gender morph Com › 7264682790오피셜 음바페 키 180cm 몸무게 81kg으로 변경 해외축구 에펨코. 해당 인물의 최근 활약상에 대한 내용에 대한 내용은 킬리안 음바페202526 시즌 문서를 참고하십시오. Days ago 음바페 선제골 벤피카 추격골 벤피카 역전골 벤피카 추가골 음바페 멀티골 아센시오 퇴장 호드리구도 골키퍼 공 뺏다가 퇴장 벤피카 쐐기골 기뻐하는 무버지 역시 스페셜 원. 본 인물의 동생이자 losc 릴 소속의 축구 선수에 대한 내용은 에단 음바페 문서를 참고하십시오. 키크고 벌크업 하니깐 상체가 어느정도. hitomi 펨돔

hitomi てらすmc Com › 7264682790오피셜 음바페 키 180cm 몸무게 81kg으로 변경 해외축구 에펨코. Net › player › primera킬리안 음바페 다음스포츠. 향긋향긋 향수 디스커버리 세트의 역사 향붕이에게 디스커버리 세트는 행복의 종합선물세트와 같은 것. Com › designri › 22374980137625토티 음바페 은카 후기 2024 프랑스 스쿼드 네이버 블로그. Nba 샌안토니오 스퍼스 소속의 프랑스 국적 농구 선수. hentai makima manga

holiday mathis daily 좆같았던 하루를 끝내고 집에 돌아와 박스를 열면온갖 아름다운 향기가 들어있는 보석 같은 동끼딱사가 들어있다노. 향긋향긋 향수 디스커버리 세트의 역사 향붕이에게 디스커버리 세트는 행복의 종합선물세트와 같은 것. 음바페 국적 키 몸무게 이적료 연봉 프로필 킬리안 음바페 프랑스어 kylian mbappé, 1998년 12월 20일 은 파리 생제르맹와 프랑스 축구 국가대표팀에서 스트라이커로 활약하고 있는 프랑스의 축구 선수이다. 오피셜 음바페 키 180cm 몸무게 81kg으로 변경 해외축구. Comm14 킬리안 음바페, 그리고 레알 마드리드.

hitomi miel 물론 이렇다고 음바페 키 무조건 바뀐다. 요즘 갤에서 음바페 떡밥이 은근 활발하길래 칼럼 가져왔다. 키가183까지 크긴했지만 키에비해 다리가긴것도 빠른거에 한몫함. 프리시즌과 이적설 2022년 5월 28일 칸 영화제. 오피셜 음바페 키 180cm 몸무게 81kg으로 변경 해외축구.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.