제시에게 사진 촬영을 요청했다가 제시 일행으로부터 폭행당한 피해자 측은 14일 jtbc 사건반장을 통해 제시의 사과문에 대한 입장을 전했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

당시 해당 사건이 언론을 통해 공개되자, 제시는 두 차례 사과문을 게시했다. O 라는 이름으로 데뷔한 뒤 우여곡절 끝에 2015년 mnet 언프리티 랩스타 에 출연하며 인지도를 얻기 시작했습니다. 다쏘시스템은 오는 2월 1일부터 4일까지 미국 휴스턴에서 3d익스피리언스 월드 20263dexperience world 2026을 개최한다고 30일 밝혔다. 제시에게 사진 촬영을 요청했다가 제시 일행으로부터 폭행당한 피해자 측은 14일 jtbc 사건반장을 통해 제시의 사과문에 대한 입장을 전했다.

Com › 814논란 딛고 복귀한 제시, Sns에 후끈 비키니 사진으로 근황 전해.

Com › View › 20250916n29880팬 폭행 방관 무혐의 제시 근황, 보고도 안 믿기는 탈아시안급 몸매.

이슈 ‘팬 폭행 방관’ 제시 논란 9개월 만독립 레이블 선언.

Net › square › 3438799780더쿠 가수 제시에 사진 요청했다가 일행에 폭행당한 팬 jtbc 사건. Minutes ago 이슈 아마존 해고 근황 블라인드 글 동료들을 떠나보내며 913 10. 그러자 제시는 성형할 시간이 없는대요라고 직접 대댓글을 남겼다, 가수 제시가 자신에게 사인을 요청한 팬이 자신의 일행으로부터 폭행 당하는 장면을 보고도 자리를 떠나는 장면이 공개 돼 논란돼 피고소인 신분으로 경찰 조사까지 받은 가운데, 소속사에 전속계약 해지를 요청한 것으로 전해졌다.

Com › arihagin1 › 224073582748제시 근황, 재산 수준.. 이슈 며칠 전 대한민국에 입국한 제시 린가드 근황 6,882 19..

Net › Square › 3803565255더쿠 Jessi 제시 Newsflash Mv.

제시 님의 거침없는 행보와 새로운 소식들을 지금부터 함께 살펴보시죠.

Txt 6,838 44 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 제시가 직접적인 가해자는 아니었으나 현장에 있으면서도 이를 적극적으로 말리지 않고 자리를 떠났다는 사실이 밝혀지며 방관 논란이 불거진 바 있다, 연이은 논란을 일으키며 한국 팬들을 실망시킨 스타들이 해외 무대를 활발히 누비고 있다. 11일 jtbc 사건반장에 따르면 한 제보자는 지난달 29일 새벽 서울 압구정의 한 골목에서 평소 좋아했던 가수 제시가 일행과 함께 있는 모습을 보고 사진을 요청하러 다가갔다고 밝혔다. Minutes ago 이슈 아마존 해고 근황 블라인드 글 동료들을 떠나보내며 913 10.

bj피츄 ☞37덬 길거리지나다니는 미친넘이였더라고 치더라도 신고는 해줄수있잖아ㅠ 그리고 애초에 아는지인의 지인이였으면 아예 모르는사이라고 말하기도 뭐함 어쨋든 관계에 read more. 마치 갱단의 제스처와 비슷했고, 주변에 있던 친구들이 폭행 당시 갱이라는 말을 들었다고 주장했다. 하나증권은 2026년 신년 목표로 ai 기반의 초개인화 자산관리를 제시했다. 그는 지난 2022년 tvn ‘프리한 닥터m’. 제시가 직접적인 가해자는 아니었으나 현장에 있으면서도 이를 적극적으로 말리지 않고 자리를 떠났다는 사실이 밝혀지며 방관 논란이 불거진 바 있다. bj ㄸㄱ

bj elleeayo 이슈 jessi 제시 newsflash mv 1,228 1. 사진 요청한 미성년 팬에 날아든 주먹가수 제시 일행 경찰. 11일 jtbc 사건반장에 따르면 한 제보자는 지난달 29일 새벽 서울 압구정의 한 골목에서 평소 좋아했던 가수 제시가 일행과 함께 있는 모습을 보고 사진을 요청하러 다가갔다고 밝혔다. Dbr알립니다dbr ces 2026 디브리핑 온라인 세미나 개최. 더팩트｜이진하 기자 가수 제시가 누리꾼의 악플에 일침을 가했다. box girl av

bj 소피아 제시 님의 거침없는 행보와 새로운 소식들을 지금부터 함께 살펴보시죠. 취재 결과 제시가 1인 기획사 설립을 준비 중인 것으로 파악됐다라고 전했다. 그래도 영상 말미에 다시 방청소도 하고. 제시는 앞으로의 활동을 통해 자신에 대한 대중의 시선을 바꾸려는 의지를 드러낸 것으로 보입니다. Net › square › 3803565255더쿠 jessi 제시 newsflash mv. bilibiliasmr

bj백하 디시 사진은 폭행 현장이 담긴 폐쇄회로 cctv 캡처. Com › ent › article‘팬 폭행 방관’ 제시, 3개월만 근황&mldr. Bo_tablecommunity&wr_id161&scabackstage 🔸 6. 이슈 단독스케줄 논란 제시, 박재범 품 떠나나계약 파기 수순 88,103 282 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 롤도란에게 많은거 안바라 블루아카마리 디자이너 근황.

bj사과 온리팬스 가수 제시가 자신에게 사인을 요청한 팬이 자신의 일행으로부터 폭행 당하는 장면을 보고도 자리를 떠나는 장면이 공개 돼 논란돼 피고소인 신분으로 경찰 조사까지 받은 가운데, 소속사에 전속계약 해지를 요청한 것으로 전해졌다. 새소식 한국 이용자분들께 유튜브 프리미엄 라이트를 선보입니다. 연이은 논란을 일으키며 한국 팬들을 실망시킨 스타들이 해외 무대를 활발히 누비고 있다. 연이은 논란을 일으키며 한국 팬들을 실망시킨 스타들이 해외 무대를 활발히 누비고 있다. 연이은 논란을 일으키며 한국 팬들을 실망시킨 스타들이 해외 무대를 활발히 누비고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.