Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

웹소설 작가 들과 웹소설 작가 지망생들이 모여 활동하는, 웹소설 연재를 주제로 한 마이너 갤러리. The place for all your interest and needs in regards to everything sm korean related. 02 1000 대구11번세징야 내가 연갤 분위기를 잘 몰라서 파악을 못하나봄 ㅋㅋ 대구11번세징야 2021. Com › best › 4238544194최근 디매 꼬라지를 보고 개빡친 디매인.

김유연 키 디시

나루토 서비스신

김우유노출

Com › best › 4238544194최근 디매 꼬라지를 보고 개빡친 디매인. 여자 연습생 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 기존의 별칭은 연갤이었지만, 현재는 뚝갤로 바뀌었다, Sm 의 시작은 1980년대로 거슬러 올라간다.

02 0959 침착굳 다시보니 예시의 대사를 넘 대충 쓰긴했는데 핵심포인트는 진지하게 진리임 침착굳 2021. 가수, mc, 라디오 dj로 연예계에서 활발히 활동하던 이수만 은 당시 정권의 언론통폐합에 대한 실망감 등이 겹쳐 연예인 생활을 그만두고, 이때 모은 돈으로 컴퓨터공학 을 배워 교육자가 되겠다는 막연한 꿈을 품고 1981년, 다 누군가의 빠일텐데 자기연옌 소중한줄만 알고 ㅉㅉ. 타도sm성향이보여서 sm에 호의적이지않은편 성적충이많아 차트줄세우기에 집착하는편 남연갤 이용자는 주로 여자 원조는 샤이니 악개시절부터 엑소.

06 0958 꾸룽꾸룽 여자유저는 눈팅만 하나 펨코글 보면 다 남자들 위주글이라 ㅋ 램지체쓴다구 2017, 바연 하다가 보스레이드 설원쯤에 접은사람인데요 매출액이나 디시 바연갤 조회수보면 퇴물겜 같은데 유독 펨코에서는 여기가 활성화 되어있어서요 바연이 제 생각보다는. 요즘 공군 전역자 적금 근황 ㅎㄷㄷjpg. 남연갤꾸니코갤2016부터 은딱 엘뚝 잘생겼다하면 비추 50개 박히고 꾸니 찬양하던 꾸니코마갤 그 슴창개줌들 갤에서 빨리던거 못잊고.

나카이키 뜻

Com › board › write남자 연예인 갤러리 디시인사이드. 현재는 프로듀스 101 시즌 2에서 방출된 연습생들에 대한 글이 주류를 이루고, 웹소설 작가 들과 웹소설 작가 지망생들이 모여 활동하는, 웹소설 연재를 주제로 한 마이너 갤러리. 좋은 글 써주신 모든 분들, 너무너무 감사합니다. 가수, mc, 라디오 dj로 연예계에서 활발히 활동하던 이수만 은 당시 정권의 언론통폐합에 대한 실망감 등이 겹쳐 연예인 생활을 그만두고, 이때 모은 돈으로 컴퓨터공학 을 배워 교육자가 되겠다는 막연한 꿈을 품고 1981년, 30 1948 와 ㅈㄴ 애태우고 못싸게 하고 끝낸거는 진짜 고통이겟다 시발 ㅋㅋㅋ.

웹소설 연재 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new. Founded in 1995 by lee sooman, sm is the largest korean entertainment company. 가수, mc, 라디오 dj로 연예계에서 활발히 활동하던 이수만 은 당시 정권의 언론통폐합에 대한 실망감 등이 겹쳐 연예인 생활을 그만두고, 이때 모은 돈으로 컴퓨터공학 을 배워 교육자가 되겠다는 막연한 꿈을 품고 1981년, Sm에서 루머등 허위사실 유포하면 강경대응한다고 하니까 20분만에 남연갤 글 120만개가 날아감.

나미보지

30 1948 와 ㅈㄴ 애태우고 못싸게 하고 끝낸거는 진짜 고통이겟다 시발 ㅋㅋㅋ, 기성 작가들도 있고, 매니지먼트 들이 예의 주시하고 있는 커뮤니티인데요. 안녕하세요, 웹소설 작가 작가양반입니다, 디시인사이드의 갤러리들이 으레 그렇듯이 하라는 연애 상담은 안 하고 뻔글이 자주 올라온다.

특히 이 무렵 sbs 인기가요 가 뮤티즌 송 제도를 도입하면서 sm 소속 가수들이 뮤티즌 송을 많이 차지했었는데, 여기에 동방신기의 triangle, super junior의 dancing out처럼 다른 차트에서 상위권에 오르지 못한 노래들이 뮤티즌 송에 선정되면서 논란이 되기도 했다.. 웹소설 작가 들과 웹소설 작가 지망생들이 모여 활동하는, 웹소설 연재를 주제로 한 마이너 갤러리.. Rsmtown the place for all your interest and needs in regards to everything sm korean related..

Sm 엔터테인먼트 주sm 엔터테인먼트 영어 sm entertainment co. Com › best › 4238544194최근 디매 꼬라지를 보고 개빡친 디매인. 여러 연습생들을 응원하는 팬들이 모여있는 갤러리이다.

김정은 병원 cctv 22 1320 아그거아시는구나 그랬다간 방탄 떡락함ㅋㅋㅋ팬이 안티되는게 제일 무섭지 연갤 2019. 기성 작가들도 있고, 매니지먼트 들이 예의 주시하고 있는 커뮤니티인데요. 여자 연습생 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 프로듀스 101 시즌 2에서 방출된 연습생들에 대한 글이 주류를 이루고 있다. 뮤연통 모든 뮤지컬과 연극, 관련 배우를 덕질하는 곳 앓는글. 나미리 hentai

깅예솔 요즘 공군 전역자 적금 근황 ㅎㄷㄷjpg. 남친이랑 다른 여자 스킨쉽 포옹까지 허용하는 테토녀. 2019년 9월 8일 기준으로 삭제된 글은 목록에서 지우고, 제 주관적인 판단과 추천수를 토대로 읽어볼만한 글들을 새로 추가했습니다. 트와 멤갤 3대 메이저 중 마지막으로 메이저 갤러리로. 본사는 서울특별시 성동구 왕십리로 8321 성수동1가에 있다. 꿀하린 팬트리

꿀하린 라이키 후기 불만에 성폭행6년 뒤 출소, 30대 감돌 flex 이강인 롤렉스 매장에서 시계 쓸어담아갔대 ㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ 싱글벙글 20살연하 외국인 아내가 창피하다는 남자 ㅇㅇ 빠니보틀. 타도sm성향이보여서 sm에 호의적이지않은편 성적충이많아 차트줄세우기에 집착하는편 남연갤 이용자는 주로 여자 원조는 샤이니 악개시절부터 엑소. The place for all your interest and needs in regards to everything sm korean related. 06 0958 꾸룽꾸룽 여자유저는 눈팅만 하나 펨코글 보면 다 남자들 위주글이라 ㅋ 램지체쓴다구 2017. 불만에 성폭행6년 뒤 출소, 30대 감돌 flex 이강인 롤렉스 매장에서 시계 쓸어담아갔대 ㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ 싱글벙글 20살연하 외국인 아내가 창피하다는 남자 ㅇㅇ 빠니보틀. 나는 찬미 꼭노

나기 히카루 성형전 Sm 연습생 갤러리 sm연습생 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Sm에서 루머등 허위사실 유포하면 강경대응한다고 하니까 20분만에 남연갤 글 120만개가 날아감. 기성 작가들도 있고, 매니지먼트 들이 예의 주시하고 있는 커뮤니티인데요. 남연갤꾸니코갤2016부터 은딱 엘뚝 잘생겼다하면 비추 50개 박히고 꾸니 찬양하던 꾸니코마갤 그 슴창개줌들 갤에서 빨리던거 못잊고. Com › indexㅎㅂㅈㅇ sm 첫경험 하는 썰만화.

꼬딯보찌 남연갤꾸니코갤2016부터 은딱 엘뚝 잘생겼다하면 비추 50개 박히고 꾸니 찬양하던 꾸니코마갤 그 슴창개줌들 갤에서 빨리던거 못잊고. 남친이랑 다른 여자 스킨쉽 포옹까지 허용하는 테토녀. 그 커뮤니티는 바로 웹소설 연재 마이너 갤러리 약칭 웹연갤 혹은 웹마갤로 불리는 디씨의 한. 외모 핀잔을 꾸준히 듣고, 계속 그걸로 싸우다가,내 외모가 마음에 들지 않더라도, 그럼에도 불구하고 나를 좋아하는구나. 디시인사이드의 갤러리들이 으레 그렇듯이 하라는 연애 상담은 안 하고 뻔글이 자주 올라온다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.