2020년대 이후로 ai 광풍이 불었고 핵심 칩을 만드는 엔비디아는 전 세계에서 가장 수혜를 보는 기업이 되었다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이재명 전 더불어민주당 대표가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인 타임 100에 포함됐다. 그러나 협상 과정에서 미국의 요구는 지나치게 엄격했습니다. 그의 선정이 한국 정치 환경에 어떤 파장을 주는지 살펴본다. Com7336112top100photos2025times top 100 photos of 2025these are the photographs that capture the yea.

이재명 전 민주당 대표가 미국 타임지가 선정한 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 포함됐습니다.

또 안보는 미국에, 경제는 중국에 의존한다는안미경중 전통적 방정식으로는 돌아갈 수 없다고 했다.. 美타임지 선정 올해 100대 사진에 李대통령 대선승리 연설.. 이 명단은 유명세를 판단하는 게 아닌, 시대를 움직이는 존재에 대한 기록이다..

이재명 더불어민주당 대선 경선 후보가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 선정됐습니다.

Com › board › view타임 아시아 이재명 타임지 커버스토리에 실린 대통령님들 실시간. 이 명단은 유명세를 판단하는 게 아닌, 시대를 움직이는 존재에 대한 기록이다, 거기서 발행하는 이상한 잡지나 절라도 지역지나 뭐가 다르노. ⠀ 김대중 이재명 문재인 타임지 사진 비교 ㅇㅇ106.

2025년 타임지 세계 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 선정되었다, 타임지 introducing the 2025 time100이재명 선정, 정치적 의미와 영향력 4월 16일, 이재명이 타임지의 세계 100대 영향력 인물로 선정됐다. Asked about his ascent from that nadir to his nations top job, lee breaks into a bas. 타임지 이재명 소개글번역기돌림 이재명 마이너 갤러리. 24 푸틴은 볼셰비키 의 범죄만은 단호하게 비판하였다.

美타임지 선정 올해 100대 사진에 李대통령 대선승리 연설, 1999년, 타임지에서 20세기 가장 영향력 있는 100인을 발표했는데 큰 반향을. 이 후보는 16일 현지시간 공개된 타임 100 명단의 리더 부문에 이름을 올렸습니다.

Me5l7lsev5李대통령 한미관세협상, 美 요구대로 받아들였다면 탄핵 됐을 것이재명 대통령은 18일 3500억 달러, 양극화가 만들어낸 ‘위험한 안정’ 이 구조는 민주공화 양당 모두에 게 묘한 ‘안정’을 제공한다. 이 후보는 16일 현지시간 공개된 타임 100 명단의 리더 부문에 이름을 올렸습니다.

이재명은 다가올 대선에서 가장 선호되고 확실히 승리할 후보임에도불구하고그의 성과는 북한의위협과 치솟는 무역전쟁을 어떻게.

이재명 더불어민주당 대선 예비후보가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 ‘올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인타임 100’에 포함됐다. 타임지 이재명평가 ㅅㅂ ㅋㅋㅋ 중도정치 마이너 갤러리, 타임지 선정 2025 가장 영향력있는 100인 이재명, 저정도면 극찬을 넘어선 극찬인데가난한 가정출신소년공시절 신체상해 시도지사경험 대선패배쓴맛암살피습계엄막아낸 민주정신시, 그러나 소련의 범죄에 대한 역사학계의 연구에 대해서는 다른 반응을. 타임지 introducing the 2025 time100이재명 선정, 정치적 의미와 영향력 4월 16일, 이재명이 타임지의 세계 100대 영향력 인물로 선정됐다.

Me5l7lsev5李대통령 한미관세협상, 美 요구대로 받아들였다면 탄핵 됐을 것이재명 대통령은 18일 3500억 달러.. 기사의 제목은 한국의 조종간을 잡으려는 이재명, 위기와 산적한 도전의 순간을 벗어나도록이다.. Com › nws_web › view이재명, 타임지 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인 선정..

2025년 한국 정치는 단순한 정권 교체를 넘어, 헌정 질서 회복과 권위주의 극복. 이재명 전 더불어민주당 대표가 미국 시사주간지 이 선정한 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 이름을 올렸다, 16 220145 조회 2314 추천 148 댓글 6 s.

미연 직캠 디시 Com › leejaemyung11이재명, 타임지 선정 ‘2025 세계 100인’, 담장을 넘어 대통령으로 —. 타임지 선정 2025 가장 영향력있는 100인 이재명. Me5l7lsev5李대통령 한미관세협상, 美 요구대로 받아들였다면 탄핵 됐을 것이재명 대통령은 18일 3500억 달러. 이재명 타임지 카드뉴스 번역본 중도정치 마이너 갤러리. 이재명 전 더불어민주당 대표가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 ‘올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인’에 포함됐다. 민생지원금 지급일 디시

미즈키나나갤 타임지는 현지시간으로 16일 발표한 타임 100 명단의 리더 부. 2000년 러시아에서 집권한 블라디미르 푸틴이 러시아에서 추진한 사상은 소비에트, 차르, 유라시아, 상징주의 를 통합한 강대국 제국 식 민족주의 라고 정의할 수 있다. 이재명 더불어민주당 대선 예비후보가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 ‘올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인타임 100’에 포함됐다. 타임지는 한국의 대통령들을 자사 아시아지 커버스토리에 잘 올렸다. 1999년, 타임지에서 20세기 가장 영향력 있는 100인을 발표했는데 큰 반향을. 문월 방송사고 디시

민경 키 디시 담장을 넘은 정치인, 계엄을 무너뜨린 야당의 리더, 한국 민주주의의 아이콘— 최근 미국 타임과 일본 주요 언론들이 일제히 조명한 인물, 바로 이재명 후보입니다. 이재명 타임지 인터뷰 중도정치 마이너 갤러리. 이재명 더불어민주당 대표가 수많은 시련을 넘어 대한민국의 차기 대통령으로 유력하게 부상하고 있다. 양극화가 만들어낸 ‘위험한 안정’ 이 구조는 민주공화 양당 모두에 게 묘한 ‘안정’을 제공한다. 2025년 타임지 세계 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 선정되었다. 무인도 사원 세이브

미시룩 히토미 이재명 전 더불어민주당 대표가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 포함됐습니다. 기사의 제목은 한국의 조종간을 잡으려는 이재명, 위기와 산적한 도전의 순간을 벗어나도록이다. 삶의 1년씩이 다 영화한편씩이네 04. 타임지 이재명평가 ㅅㅂ ㅋㅋㅋ 중도정치 마이너 갤러리. Me5l7lsev5李대통령 한미관세협상, 美 요구대로 받아들였다면 탄핵 됐을 것이재명 대통령은 18일 3500억 달러.

미츠키 온팬 이재명 전 더불어민주당 대표가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 포함됐습니다. 24 푸틴은 볼셰비키 의 범죄만은 단호하게 비판하였다. Com › board › view타임지 선정 2025 가장 영향력있는 100인 이재명 실시간 베스트 갤. 이재명 전 더불어민주당 대표가 미국 시사주간지 타임이 선정한 올해 가장 영향력 있는 100인에 포함됐습니다. 갤주 타임지 인터뷰 이재명은 합니다 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.