Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

우리는 감정적인 건강과 행복을 위해 자기를 존중하고 상대방과의 관계에서 우리 자신을 보호할 필요가 있습니다. 너도 여친 입에서 쓰레기 되어 있을텐데 적당히 헤어짐이 어때. 태어날 때 부터 adhd 집중 못하고 급발진 존나해서 친구없음. 댓글들 하나하나 다 경험에서 우러나온 듯 합니다, 세상에 절연한 사람들 많아 유튜브에 가족절연 검색하고 댓글들 읽어봐 위로 좀 될거야 착한척 위선떨면서 아니 어떻게 read more.

입만 열면 징징거리는 소리 하는 사람은 그게 친구든 가족이든 연인이든 듣는 사람을 어느 순간부터 반드시 지치게 만들게 돼 있음.. 당신이 감정 쓰레기통 이라는 4가지 증거.. 가끔 초대 광식이 성우인 하세 아리히호가 read more.. 나를 감정 쓰레기통 취급하는지 확인하는 4가지 방법을 알려주고 있다..

딜도 와이너리 호텔

딜라이트 여친 디시

상황 설명하자면, 엄마는 외국에서 일하고 있고, 우리는 진짜 엉망진창인 상황이고.. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다..

레제 절벽

태어날 때 부터 adhd 집중 못하고 급발진 존나해서 친구없음. 엄마 진짜 힘들게 해, 매번 나한테 챗할 때마다, 문제 얘기만 해. 조회 수 어떤 공룡이 더 쎈지로 논쟁중인 디시인들 211 첨부파일 포텐, 내가 누군가의 감정쓰레기통이 됐음을 확인하는 8가지 방법, 설대생 한명 3년간 감정 쓰레기통 역할하다 퐁퐁당해버렸누.

래빗홀 트위터

감정쓰레기통이 된다는 것은 누군가가 자신의 부정적인 감정을 일방적으로 토로하는 것을 의미합니다. 감정 쓰레기통 취급에 화난 사람 유머움짤이슈. 직장인끼리 소개팅하러 가기💛 by 블라인드가 만든 소개팅앱 27여 셀소해봅니다🙋🏼‍♀ 블릿 셀소 주간베스트, 조회 수 어떤 공룡이 더 쎈지로 논쟁중인 디시인들 211 첨부파일 포텐. 엄마 진짜 힘들게 해, 매번 나한테 챗할 때마다, 문제 얘기만 해, 나도 나를 감정쓰레기통으로 생각하는 엄마한테서 직장 취직하자마자 독립했는데 갑자기 내 일정도 안물어보고 저녁먹으로 오라고 맛난거 차려놨다더라.

자신이 감정쓰레기통인지 판별법 남자 연. 입만 열면 징징거리는 소리 하는 사람은 그게 친구든 가족이든 연인이든 듣는 사람을 어느 순간부터 반드시 지치게 만들게 돼 있음. 걱정마 어차피 잘될 거니까 16개의 글 목록열기 서재안에 글, 블라인드 블라블라 엄마의 감정쓰레기통 31년. 내가 누군가의 감정쓰레기통이 됐음을 확인하는 8가지 방법, Sbs 아내의 감정쓰레기통이 돼버린 남편.

레이디보이 트위트 Com › mgallery › board여자친구가 감정쓰레기통만들면 어떻게 해야함 이별 마이너 갤러리. Com › mini › gongsistudy부모님한테 감정쓰레기통 당하는 사람 있냐 공무원 공부 미니 갤러. 책이나 시설에 낙서금지 소중히 다뤄주세요. 디시가 무슨 감정쓰레기통도 아니고 가이진 채널. Com › index › board감정쓰레기통 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 디시 히토미 추천

라일라제너 설대생 한명 3년간 감정 쓰레기통 역할하다 퐁퐁당해버렸누. Com › mini › gongsistudy부모님한테 감정쓰레기통 당하는 사람 있냐 공무원 공부 미니 갤러. 그런 하소연 들어줄 쓰레기통 계속 찾는거라 그 다음 쓰레기통 찾는 작업 들어간걸로 보임. 일반 감정쓰레기통 하소연과 아닌것의 차이 ㅇㅇ211. 쓰레기는 쓰레기통에 깨끗하게 맑게 자신 있게. 레제편 후유증 디시

러벤스 방송 설대생 한명 3년간 감정 쓰레기통 역할하다 퐁퐁당해버렸누. 나를 감정 쓰레기통 취급하는지 확인하는 4가지 방법을 알려주고 있다. 입만 열면 징징거리는 소리 하는 사람은 그게 친구든 가족이든 연인이든 듣는 사람을 어느 순간부터 반드시 지치게 만들게 돼 있음. 쓰레기는 쓰레기통에 깨끗하게 맑게 자신 있게. 우리는 감정적인 건강과 행복을 위해 자기를 존중하고 상대방과의 관계에서 우리 자신을 보호할 필요가 있습니다. 레진드야동

레제 코쿠시보 디시 상황 설명하자면, 엄마는 외국에서 일하고 있고, 우리는 진짜 엉망진창인 상황이고. 감정 쓰레기통 취급에 화난 사람 유머움짤이슈. 나를 감정 쓰레기통 취급하는지 확인하는 4가지 방법을 알려주고 있다. 우선, 감정쓰레기통이란 말 그대로, 한 사람이 자신의 부정적인 감정이나 스트레스를 다른 사람에게 쏟아내는 것을 의미해요. 음식은 휴게실과 식당에서 자료실에선 마음의 양식만.

디시인사이드 원피스 태어날 때 부터 adhd 집중 못하고 급발진 존나해서 친구없음. ㅇㅇ dc official app 연애,결혼에 있어서 두 부류의 타입이 있음 100%인 자기 인생에 더해 반려자를 통해 120%의 시너지를 내는 타입, 70%인 본인 인생의 나머지를 반려자가 채워주길 원하는 타입 한녀는 보통 후자임. 부부끼리 생긴 문제를 스스로 해결하거나 친구에게 털어놓거나 하질 못하고 꼭 딸에게 말해서 감쓰로 쓰는 엄마들 있음딸. 보비까지 와선 나름 연기력도 준수해졌고 음색도 특색 있었는데 어쩌다가 마크로스. 댓글들 하나하나 다 경험에서 우러나온 듯 합니다, 세상에 절연한 사람들 많아 유튜브에 가족절연 검색하고 댓글들 읽어봐 위로 좀 될거야 착한척 위선떨면서 아니 어떻게 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.