Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

愛爾達電視確認本季（202526賽季）無法取得nba新一年度之授權，本季起將不提供任何nba賽事轉播服務。 感謝nba官方多年來的支持與協助，讓愛爾達與nba過去十年來共同打造經典轉播回憶。 祝福nba聯盟及所有球迷持續享受籃球的熱情與榮耀。 2. Hours ago moneydj新聞 20260130 121425 新聞中心 發佈愛爾達電視與緯來電視網昨29日共同宣布，確認緯來電視網取得2026年世界棒球經典賽（world baseball classic 2026, wbc）於今年3月舉行之47場賽事轉播權；此外，愛爾達電視將從2月14日起的明星賽周末，加入美國職業籃球聯盟nba（national basketball association）的轉播. Hours ago — 愛爾達電視elta. 愛爾達電視全文如下： 愛爾達電視確認本季（202526賽季）無法取得nba新一年度之授權，本季起將不提供任何nba賽事轉播服務。 感謝nba官方多年來的支持與協助，讓愛爾達與nba過去十年來共同打造經典轉播回憶。 祝福nba聯盟及所有球迷持續享受籃球的熱情與榮耀。.

토모에 히카리 Avdbs

Tv › channel › play愛爾達體育 1 台 熱門體育賽事live直播線上看 愛爾達elta tv影視.. 愛爾達電視（elta tv）今日正式宣布，已成功取得美國職籃nba 20262030 賽季、共計4..

트위터 국산 리트윗

트위터 Green777

탈모 드랍 컷 디시

Cc › bbs › nba情報 elta 愛爾達近期轉播規劃說明 看板 nba 批踢踢實業坊.. Tv最精彩 吳昇府、曾文誠坐鎮澄清湖 直擊台鋼雄鷹「翅膀硬了」 中華職棒36年下半球季將於74起火熱開打，elta.. Tv、hamivideo 愛爾達體育1台、體育2台、體育3台、體育4台 愛爾達體育.. This guy is a delay of game..

Tv › channel直播頻道觀看精彩賽事live直播 愛爾達elta tv影視. Day ago 球迷有福了！國內兩大體育轉播公司愛爾達電視（elta tv）與緯來電視網今（29）日發布聯合新聞稿，宣布雙方將展開合作。愛爾達將從2月14日起重返, But nah that was a bs call tho the refs need. Hours ago 本賽季nba戰況進入白熱化階段，各區排名競爭激烈，球星狀態全面升溫，季後賽門票之爭與冠軍走向逐漸明朗。愛爾達電視董事長陳怡君表示，愛爾達電視長期以來視nba為重點轉播項目，至今將邁入第17年。 2026年是運動轉播超級大年，愛爾達持續強化內容佈局；而nba的重磅回歸，正是年度最重要的.

트위터 떡감 愛爾達電視台不會轉播新賽季nba。 （圖／翻攝自愛爾達電視台fb） nba美國職籃新賽季（202526賽季）將在台灣時間週三（22日）上午開打，然而過去轉播nba長達10個賽季的愛爾達電視日前發出聲明表示，因無法取得nba新一年度之授權，所以本季起將不提供任何nba賽事轉播服務。 雖然愛爾達宣布不轉播新賽季nba，讓許多球迷大嘆少了一個收看賽事的管道，不過愛爾達也透露明（2026）年已取得「wbc世界棒球經典賽」、「世界盃足球賽」及「名古屋亞運」等3大國際賽事獨家轉播總代理權，是國內唯一同時擁有三大賽事轉播權之單位，盼球迷持續支持，一同見證更多運動經典時刻。 1. Tv › channel直播頻道觀看精彩賽事live直播 愛爾達elta tv影視. Days ago 推 xxoxx hami沒得看就沒注意nba了，不過這季nba 484很難看？ 0128 2329 推 momoflower 太好了！ 不然上班好無聊 0128 2332. Tw › sports › 3020923nba／愛爾達不播nba了！明年握有3大國際賽獨家轉播代理權. 愛爾達電視確認本季（202526賽季）無法取得nba新一年度之授權，本季起將不提供任何nba賽事轉播服務。 感謝nba官方多年來的支持與協助，讓愛爾達與nba過去十年來共同打造經典轉播回憶。 祝福nba聯盟及所有球迷持續享受籃球的熱情與榮耀。 2. 탑걸 불법 주소

타케나카 愛爾達電視確認本季（202526賽季）無法取得nba新一年度之授權，本季起將不提供任何nba賽事轉播服務。 感謝nba官方多年來的支持與協助，讓愛爾達與nba過去十年來共同打造經典轉播回憶。 祝福nba聯盟及所有球迷持續享受籃球的熱情與榮耀。 2. 202425賽季nba美國職籃 ＝＝＝本週賽事轉播預告＝＝＝ 0427 日 0502 五 敬請鎖定 中華電信mod200頻道 mod. Tv › channel直播頻道觀看精彩賽事live直播 愛爾達elta tv影視. 公鹿 🏀 主播：黃昶豪／講評：古硯偉 🏀. 《愛爾達天天nba》1月份賽程在這裡🎉🎉 🙋🏻‍♂️天天nba哪裡看？ ☑ 電視 中華電信mod 體育1台 ch 200 ☑ 電腦、行動裝置 ios & android & pc 皆可收視 eltaott seltaott. 트릴리 슈 버스

토우지 키 몸무게 Tv與中華電信mod平台；hami video無版權。 3. 在 app store 下載愛爾達科技的《愛爾達電視》。查看截圖、評分與評論、使用者提示以及更多與《愛爾達電視》類似的遊戲。. 202425賽季nba美國職籃例行賽 ＝＝＝0210 一轉播預告＝＝＝ 0300 76人 vs. Tw › news › 20260130700767430201《數雲端》愛爾達取得nba 20262030賽季轉播權 證券 工商時報. 愛爾達體育頻道 elta sports taiwan 中華電信mod ch200201202203 網路收看 elta. 트위터 대딸장인

탑 후니 트위터 5季轉播權 將一路將播到2030年 nba. 作者 yuiianitima 唯 看板 mod 標題 其他 mod、hamivideo 轉播nba 時間 wed jan 28 19 s. 職棒36年下半季熱力開打 74起鎖定elta. 作者 yuiianitima 唯 看板 mod 標題 其他 mod、hamivideo 轉播nba 時間 wed jan 28 19 s. But nah that was a bs call tho the refs need.

트와이스한테 고소당한썰 Tv線上影視服務的優質首選！ 觀看精彩賽事live直播，包括wbc棒球經典賽、fifa世界盃足球賽、愛知名古屋亞運、mlb棒球、中華職棒、bwf羽球、英超足球、歐冠、f1賽車和網球等。. Tv線上影視服務的優質首選！ 觀看精彩賽事live直播，包括wbc棒球經典賽、fifa世界盃足球賽、愛知名古屋亞運、mlb棒球、中華職棒、bwf羽球、英超足球、歐冠、f1賽車和網球等。. Day ago 球迷有福了！國內兩大體育轉播公司愛爾達電視（elta tv）與緯來電視網今（29）日發布聯合新聞稿，宣布雙方將展開合作。愛爾達將從2月14日起重返. Tv › channel › play愛爾達體育 1 台 熱門體育賽事live直播線上看 愛爾達elta tv影視. Day ago 22731港都棒球國際交流賽 鎖定elta.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.