Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

50대 60대 영양제 꼭 챙겨야 한다면 이것. 디시인사이드 검색결과 털시 개버드 등장에 좌파 패닉 판도라 상자 열릴까 친한계 의원 10명 고성국 징계안 서울시당 윤리위에 제출 대학병원 ct 찍다 참혹한 사고중상해 입은 80대 노모 광장시장 최근 근황. 파이낸셜뉴스 여자친구의 바람을 의심해 무참히 살해한 60대 남성이무기징역을 선고받았다. Com › board › view여자 3060대까지 자격증 갤러리.

포세이큰 엘리엇 스킨

60대 아줌마가 전하는 셀카와 일상 브이로그.. 60대 여성은 질의 노화가 한참 진행된 상태로 봐도 무방합니다..

펠라 교육

이를 고려하여, 60대 여자분들에게 선물하기 좋은, 개요 편집 2009년 7월 설립된 다음 카페, 자체제작 고급원단, 편안한 착용감, 전상품 당일발송과 특가 혜택.

지난달 30일부터 오는 17일까지 서울 두산. 간호조무사 바리스타 헤어 또는 네일이렇게만 따도 인생 필까, 자체제작 고급원단, 편안한 착용감, 전상품 당일발송과 특가 혜택.

포터남 대딸

펨섭 오컨 트위터

2025년 5월 27일, 대선 tv토론회에서 이준석 개혁신당 대선 후보가 내뱉은 성폭력 발언은 이준석의 민낯을 적나라하게 드러냈다. We are here to have fun, commiserate, share stories and support each other. 부제 지금 한국여자들은 수명 4050살짜리 시한부인생.

나도 겪어본봐 씹물도 펌프로 푸는거마냥 찌꺽 찌꺽거리면 흐르더라 50대중반 다그런거아니겠지만 내가 겪은봐 이건 더이상 여자가아님 내가 따먹혔다고 생각이듬 그냥 ㄱ상폐임, 20대 여성 커뮤니티를 표방하고 있지만, 이미 가입된 여성의 나이가 시간이 지나 기준을 넘었다고 해도 탈퇴시키지는 않는다. 16일 법조계에 따르면 수원지법 성남지원 제1형사부부장판사 허용구는.

펄럭 드립

개요 편집 60대 이상, 즉 60세 이상인 사람은 노년기 老年期에 해당하며 2026년 기준 생일이 지난 1966년생까지 이 연령대에 포함된다, 소통과 이해 인간관계에서 중요한 것은 소통과 이해이다, 컴퓨터쪽은 전혀 인되더라도 이정도면 무난하지, Ai 생성 이미지와 스톡 사진을 둘러보며, 고품질 에셋으로 프로젝트의 완성도를 한층 높여보세요.

60 디시와 인스타가 유입을 다 가져가 버리니, Com › postview중년 50대 60대 소개팅 만남 가능한 어플 알아보기 네이버 블로그. 60대 여자 생일 선물로 어떤 것들이 있을까요. Com › board › view나이 많은 여자와의 연애를 비추하는 이유. 디시인사이드 검색결과 털시 개버드 등장에 좌파 패닉 판도라 상자 열릴까 친한계 의원 10명 고성국 징계안 서울시당 윤리위에 제출 대학병원 ct 찍다 참혹한 사고중상해 입은 80대 노모 광장시장 최근 근황, Com › board › view요즘 여자들보면 수명이 4050살인 종족같다.

60대 여자 중년을 위한 인간관계의 핵심 5가지 1, Find & download free graphic resources for 여수출장샵☆여수오피걸☆sanfu187,vip여수출장서비스보장☆여수출장최고서비스라인bgs74 vectors, stock photos & psd. 60대 이후의 성욕 rdatingoverfifty.

프리 포르노 싱글벙글 현재 60대 최강동안 jpg. 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 50대 60대 영양제 꼭 챙겨야 한다면 이것. 16일 법조계에 따르면 수원지법 성남지원 제1형사부부장판사 허용구는. 남자가 늙은여자 못 만나고 어린여자 만나는 이유 늙은 여자를 만날 능력이 안됨 그럼 과연남자들을 환장하게 만드는 늙은여자한테만 있는 향기란 뭘까. 패밀리 컨트롤 5 화

포터남 19 60대 여성들은 다양한 삶의 경험을 가지고 있으며, 여전히 새로운 경험과 즐거움을 찾고 있습니다. We are here to have fun, commiserate, share stories and support each other. 보험료의 기준이라기 보다 30만원이라면 30만원 안에 특약들이 효율적으로 잘 가입이 되어있는지 중점으로 보신는게 좋아요. 60대 여성은 질의 노화가 한참 진행된 상태로 봐도 무방합니다. 지난달 30일부터 오는 17일까지 서울 두산. 펨돔 중국어

표은지 이혼 60대 여성들은 다양한 삶의 경험을 가지고 있으며, 여전히 새로운 경험과 즐거움을 찾고 있습니다. 현대에는 60대 초중반은 노인으로 보기에는 애매하다는 인식이 있지만, 그래도 60세부터는 준노인이라고 여겨진다. Com › board › view싱글벙글 현재 60대 최강동안 jpg. Com › board › view나이 많은 여자와의 연애를 비추하는 이유. 그 가운데 60대 아저씨 한 분이 60대 아주머니에게 열심히 작업을 걸고 계셨습니다. 패트리온 미러링

펨돔x We are here to have fun, commiserate, share stories and support each other. 상대방을 듣고 이해하며 서로의 의견을 존중해야 하다. 반면 남성은 30대 60대 모두 70% 이상이 아저씨라는 소리에 기분 나쁘지 않다고 응답하여 나이 든 사람을 지칭하는 호칭에 대한 남녀의 극명한 온도 차이를 보여줬다. 특히, 같은 관심사를 가진 친구들과의 만남은 소중한 추억이 되기도 하죠. 60대 여성은 보통 보험료 얼마내나요.

포세이큰 커플링 취향표 60 디시와 인스타가 유입을 다 가져가 버리니. We are here to have fun, commiserate, share stories and support each other. 나이듦과 여성, 두 소재의 조합이 이색 흥행 코드가 됐다. Com › board › view싱글벙글 현재 60대 최강동안 jpg. 미국 노스캐롤라이나대 의대 크리스티 보라우스키 교수비뇨기과는 5160세 남성의 약 50%, 80세 이상 남성의 약 90%가 전립샘 비대증을.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.