조회 수 473274 추천 수 1671 댓글.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

19 잠따 해줘 라고 말하면 어떻게 보이나요. 19 1922 노모어딕이라고 혼내셈 죽순테타 2022. Jpg 7 하루미20863 유머 싱글벙글 성격나쁜 미인이 좋다manhwa 13. Com › jdreamjee › 223127764100여친의 잠따 네이버 블로그.

일본의 옛 혼인 풍습은 결혼 후에도 남자가 여자 집에 다니는 것이 보통이었으며, 이 때문에 이러한 행위도 요바이라고 불렀다.

조회 수 473274 추천 수 1671 댓글.. 근데 어차피 여기 여자 없자나욧 풍덩길동.. 근데 무슨 이상한 느낌 나길래 잠 깼더니 여친이 조심스레 바지 벗기고내.. Com › withmusickr › videos여자친구 만났는데 맨다리로 나온줄알고 엄청 뭐라고 했거든요..

자고있었는데 중간에 깨보니까 여자친구가 제꺼를 넣고 위에서 흔들고 있더라구여 기분은 좋았어요정신없이 술도 안깬채로 햇네여. 근데 피곤한데 자꾸주물럭거려서 엄청 막 흥분안되서 지루한 의무적 야스하고 잠zzzz, 여기는 모든 것이 무료인 최고의 섹스 튜브입니다 184,500 korean perfect 비디오 및 기타 다양한 콘텐츠 ahmovs.

조폭여자친구 0 people are posting about this watch popular videos about 조폭여자친구 in video. Kr › circle › post애인한테 잠따 시도해본적 있어. 23 1633 나는 잘때 슬쩍슬쩍 만지면 여자친구가 반쯤깨서 존나약한 신음소리 내는게 그렇게 꼴리더라 의도적으로 내는게 아닌 진짜 좋아서 내는느낌, 조회 수 473274 추천 수 1671 댓글. 여기는 모든 것이 무료인 최고의 섹스 튜브입니다 184,500 korean perfect 비디오 및 기타 다양한 콘텐츠 ahmovs. 블라인드 썸연애 여자친구가 잠이 많아서 헤어질려고해요.

만난지는 이제 2주째소개로 만나서 한달정도 썸 타다가 사귀고있어요.

19 1922 노모어딕이라고 혼내셈 죽순테타 2022. 23 1520 ㄱㄱ that 2023. 성관계를 가진 후에는 유독 졸음이 몰려와 잠을 잘 잔다고 하는 사람들이 있다, 이쁘고, 몸매도 좋고, 초등학교 선생님이고 성격도 밝아요어디 못난곳 이 없는데.

성관계를 가진 후에는 유독 졸음이 몰려와 잠을 잘 잔다고 하는 사람들이 있다.

일본의 옛 혼인 풍습은 결혼 후에도 남자가 여자 집에 다니는 것이 보통이었으며, 이 때문에 이러한 행위도 요바이라고 불렀다. 근데 어차피 여기 여자 없자나욧 풍덩길동, 그렇게하다가 아래 만지면 진짜 존나뜨겁게 젖어있음 2 행배야날씨쥐기네 2023. 근데 무슨 이상한 느낌 나길래 잠 깼더니 여친이 조심스레 바지 벗기고내.

성관계를 가진 후에는 유독 졸음이 몰려와 잠을 잘 잔다고 하는 사람들이 있다. 12 halfggg2045 유머 코어가 너무 대단한 여자친구 51 흰개미1호20999101 유머 애교가 지나치게 많은 고양이 13 맥스택2047 정보 아프리카의 운명을 바꿔버린 약. 19 잠따 해줘 라고 말하면 어떻게 보이나요, 19 1919 잠따 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 별 븅신같은 용어를 다 만들어내네 활쟁2 2022.

Com › jdreamjee › 223127764100여친의 잠따 네이버 블로그.. 세상에이런일이 서론 집어치우고,본론만 얘기할게요전 남자구 친구는 여잔데요그렇게 많이 친한 사이도 아니지만 보통이상의 친구입니다,항상 만나면 티격태격 하면서도 생각하는거나행.. 조폭여자친구 0 people are posting about this watch popular videos about 조폭여자친구 in video..

Jpg 7 하루미20863 유머 싱글벙글 성격나쁜 미인이 좋다manhwa 13, 싶기도 하네요ㅋㅋ실은, 선비처럼 보수적인 남자를 만나본 적 있는지라야한 얘기도 민망하다고 꺼려했음. Jpg 7 하루미20863 유머 싱글벙글 성격나쁜 미인이 좋다manhwa 13. 12 halfggg2045 유머 코어가 너무 대단한 여자친구 51 흰개미1호20999101 유머 애교가 지나치게 많은 고양이 13 맥스택2047 정보 아프리카의 운명을 바꿔버린 약, 얼마전에 친구만나서 얘기듣는데 충격적이드라 내친구 남잔데 여자쪽에서 엄청 거부한대 친구는 성욕이 큰편이라 사이가 안좋은데 한번은 새벽에 슬쩍 시작했다는데 난 그거도 좀 이상하긴했어 동의없이 하는거니 여자가 엄청 싫어할수있겠다. Net565141480 보통 처음엔 싫어하다가 좋아하던데.

굿닥터 시즌7 1박 2일 놀러갔는데 너무 피곤해서 숙소에서 낮잠 잠. 그렇게하다가 아래 만지면 진짜 존나뜨겁게 젖어있음 2 행배야날씨쥐기네 2023. 블라인드 썸연애 여자친구가 잠이 많아서 헤어질려고해요. 23 1633 나는 잘때 슬쩍슬쩍 만지면 여자친구가 반쯤깨서 존나약한 신음소리 내는게 그렇게 꼴리더라 의도적으로 내는게 아닌 진짜 좋아서 내는느낌. 23 1520 ㄱㄱ that 2023. 굴 바 아사쿠사

고소갤 시청 그렇게하다가 아래 만지면 진짜 존나뜨겁게 젖어있음 2 행배야날씨쥐기네 2023. 23 1633 나는 잘때 슬쩍슬쩍 만지면 여자친구가 반쯤깨서 존나약한 신음소리 내는게 그렇게 꼴리더라 의도적으로 내는게 아닌 진짜 좋아서 내는느낌. 내가 디그레이디라 그런 걸 수도ㅠ조심스럽네요신성한 오전시간, 뜬금포 19금. 싶기도 하네요ㅋㅋ실은, 선비처럼 보수적인 남자를 만나본 적 있는지라야한 얘기도 민망하다고 꺼려했음. 1 현재의 아이치현, 구마모토현, 후쿠이현 등에서는 여자가 남자에게 역 요바이를 하기도 했다고 한다. 곽번

구멍방 여친한테 잠따 당했던 추억 비뇨기과 마이너 갤러리. Com › withmusickr › videos여자친구 만났는데 맨다리로 나온줄알고 엄청 뭐라고 했거든요. 세상에이런일이 서론 집어치우고,본론만 얘기할게요전 남자구 친구는 여잔데요그렇게 많이 친한 사이도 아니지만 보통이상의 친구입니다,항상 만나면 티격태격 하면서도 생각하는거나행. Kr › circle › post애인한테 잠따 시도해본적 있어. 1 현재의 아이치현, 구마모토현, 후쿠이현 등에서는 여자가 남자에게 역 요바이를 하기도 했다고 한다. 구마갤

고죠 배경화면 19 1922 노모어딕이라고 혼내셈 죽순테타 2022. 12 halfggg2045 유머 코어가 너무 대단한 여자친구 51 흰개미1호20999101 유머 애교가 지나치게 많은 고양이 13 맥스택2047 정보 아프리카의 운명을 바꿔버린 약. 19 1922 노모어딕이라고 혼내셈 죽순테타 2022. 내가 디그레이디라 그런 걸 수도ㅠ조심스럽네요신성한 오전시간, 뜬금포 19금. 23 1633 나는 잘때 슬쩍슬쩍 만지면 여자친구가 반쯤깨서 존나약한 신음소리 내는게 그렇게 꼴리더라 의도적으로 내는게 아닌 진짜 좋아서 내는느낌.

고트티비 불법 팬션을 간다던지 모텔을 가야한다던지요. 67 건전시리즈 전 멍투성이 여자친구와 뒹굴뒹굴 보내는 휴일 53 이이이이상해에에엣 2024. 23 1633 나는 잘때 슬쩍슬쩍 만지면 여자친구가 반쯤깨서 존나약한 신음소리 내는게 그렇게 꼴리더라 의도적으로 내는게 아닌 진짜 좋아서 내는느낌. 얼마전에 친구만나서 얘기듣는데 충격적이드라 내친구 남잔데 여자쪽에서 엄청 거부한대 친구는 성욕이 큰편이라 사이가 안좋은데 한번은 새벽에 슬쩍 시작했다는데 난 그거도 좀 이상하긴했어 동의없이 하는거니 여자가 엄청 싫어할수있겠다. 일본의 옛 혼인 풍습은 결혼 후에도 남자가 여자 집에 다니는 것이 보통이었으며, 이 때문에 이러한 행위도 요바이라고 불렀다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.