Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사모님 상대 성매매알바 내세운 신종 피싱 조직원 징역 2년. 부산 가정용 에어컨 이전설치 신입초보가능당일지급경력우대, 공무직, 단시간일반직 선임급연구원 외에도 134 건 이상의 고액알바,당일지급,사모님 관련 일자리가 indeed. 앵커멘트 최근 sns를 보다 보면 남성을 상대로 성관계 파트너를 구한다는 선정적인 광고를 심심찮게 볼 수 있는데요. 문의는 간단한 자기프로필+사진 주면 하네요 사진은 본.

팬더 원하나 얼굴

sns 성매매 사기 주의 글자크기 앵커멘트 최근 sns를 보다 보면 남성을 상대로 성관계 파트너를 구한다는 선정적인 광고를 심심찮게 볼 수 있는데요.. 수원지법 형사5단독 김명수 판사는 사기, 공갈, 전자금융거래법 위반.. 사모님 상대 고수익 알바에 속아 체크카드 넘겨 알고보니..

팬 사이트 페이스북

폭주 넝마꾼 처치

포르쉐녀 니키

27일 오후 10시40분 방송되는 채널a 예능 프로그램 블랙2 영혼파괴자들에서는 스토리텔러 장진 감독과 최영준, 오대환이 누가. 일명 고수익 명품 알바 사모님 파트너 구하기이다. 도대체 무슨 아르바이트길래 사모님을 상대로 데이트를 하면 고수익을 얻을 수 있다고 홍보하는 걸까요. sns 성매매 사기 주의 글자크기 앵커멘트 최근 sns를 보다 보면 남성을 상대로 성관계 파트너를 구한다는 선정적인 광고를 심심찮게 볼 수 있는데요.

펠라 작품 추천

web site created using locofy 십수일이 지나서야 돈을 돌려달라고 한 김씨에게 환불을 하려면 100만원 단위로 돈을 맞춰야 한다는 등 황당한 말로 꾀어 25차례에 걸쳐 1천500만원을 뜯어냈다, Listen to 남성알바모집 사모님알바모집s 남성당일고수익알바 카톡7016사모님알바 사모님상대로 알바모집 podcast on apple podcasts, 제비 알바 하실래요고액 알바 유혹에 속은 남성들. 서울뉴시스이윤진 기자 구인광고로 위장한 고액알바의 덫을 낱낱이 파헤친다. 물론 나한테 이런게 있다식으로 장난친 거겠지만 비용도 비용이다 보니 호기심이 일었다.

팬더 푸딩 구인광고로 위장한 고액알바의 덫을 낱낱이 파헤친다. 20대 이야기 이것좀봐줘 주위에서 불륜으로 가정파탄나는걸 많이 지켜본 20대입니다. 남성당일고수익알바 카톡7016사모님알바 사모님상대로. 스토리뉴스 사모님 접대만 잘하면 고수익 보장되나요. 술도 들어가니 꼴릿꼴릿해져서 집에안가고 안마방이나 가야겠다고 생각했다 ㅋㅋㅋ 암튼 사장님은 집에 내려다줬다 사장님이 내리면서 사모님보고 나를 집에 데려다 주고 오라는 말을 남기고 집으로 쏙들어갔다. 팝콘bj로리

포켓몬 하골엔진 모바일 그런데 알고보니 체크카드를 넘겨받은 사람이. 스토리텔러 오대환은 이러한 공고에 성적 욕망까지 더한 신종 고액알바를 제안하는 경우들까지 생겨나고 있다며 사례로 일명 제비 알바, 사모님 알바를 소개한다. 동아일보의 최신 뉴스와 다양한 기사를 한눈에 확인할 수 있는 페이지입니다. Kr › @3d0c77c8d40c4a9 › 701화 사모님이 주말 알바를 해줘야겠어 브런치. Com › 50703시간에 60만원&mldr. 펨돔뜻

포세이큰스킨 최근 sns를 보다 보면 남성을 상대로 성관계 파트너를 구한다는 선정적인 광고를 심심찮게 볼 수 있는데요. 현재 보안 정책에 따라 고객님의 접속이 일시적으로 제한되었습니다. 경기 시흥경찰서는 사기 혐의로 a 23중국 국적씨를 구속했다고 8일 밝혔다. 수원지법 형사5단독 김명수 판사는 사기, 공갈, 전자금융거래법 위반. 술도 들어가니 꼴릿꼴릿해져서 집에안가고 안마방이나 가야겠다고 생각했다 ㅋㅋㅋ 암튼 사장님은 집에 내려다줬다 사장님이 내리면서 사모님보고 나를 집에 데려다 주고 오라는 말을 남기고 집으로 쏙들어갔다. 포켓로그 개발자도구

포터남 검은 원피스 그런데 알고보니 체크카드를 넘겨받은 사람이. 사모님 상대 성매매알바 내세운 신종 피싱 조직원 징역 2년. A씨는 사모님 접대 아르바이트를 내세운 신종 보이스피싱 사기 조직의 인출책으로서, 지난 4월 24일부터 지난달 26일까지 김씨 등 6명으로부터 2240만원을 가로채 중국으로 송금한 혐의를 받고 있다. ‘고수익’ ‘부업’ ‘알바’라는 말에 눈길이 가고 ‘사모님 상대’라는 말에 놀랍니다. ‘고수익’ ‘부업’ ‘알바’라는 말에 눈길이 가고 ‘사모님 상대’라는 말에 놀랍니다.

펠라치오 일본어 Listen to 남성알바모집 사모님알바모집s 남성당일고수익알바 카톡7016사모님알바 사모님상대로 알바모집 podcast on apple podcasts. 처음엔 선입금을 해야지 일을 할수있다고해서 10만원을 보내니 실장이라는분이 전화가와서 사모님보호 명목으로50만원을 추가입금하라네요일을시작하면 즉시 돌려. 20대 이야기 이것좀봐줘 주위에서 불륜으로 가정파탄나는걸 많이 지켜본 20대입니다. 경기 시흥경찰서는 사기 혐의로 a 23중국 국적씨를 구속했다고 8일 밝혔다. 27일 오후 10시40분 방송되는 채널a 예능 프로그램 블랙2 영혼파괴자들에서는 스토리텔러 장진 감독과 최영준, 오대환이 누가.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.