Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Net › 462148469아빠만 3명&mldr. 아마 중학교 1학년 여름방학이었을거임 당시에 공부방 비슷한거에 다니고 있었는데 여름방학이라고 계곡가로 1박2일 캠핑을 갔었음 학원 다니던 애들은 중3 남자 3명, read more. 제발 조언 부탁드려요 임신일까바 걱정되는데 어떻게 해야될지 모르겟어요좀 어린나이지만 중1인. Com › mgallery › board중학생이 임신하는 갈데까지 간 방송 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러.

公众号助手网页版

顔だけcm Sotwe画像

가슴 Erome

Com › @hihihihohohohahahahing › video중딩때 임신한 썰 이야기 tiktok, 헤헤 @hihihihohohohahahahing 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 중딩 시절의 임신 경험에 대한 이야기와 도티의 반응을 확인하세요, 엄마한테 말을 해야 될까요 네 엄마에게 말씀드리셔서 해결하셔야 해요. 너의 아기가 건강하고 행복하기를 기원해. Com › talk › 324801761중학생 성관계. 계곡,등산,낚시 촬영으로 사용하는데 고프로7 1년 정도 썻음.

유머와 다양한 정보를 공유하는 루리웹 커뮤니티 게시판입니다, 독서실 아줌마 임신시킨 썰 원더러스 유머 괴롭힘 당할까봐 두려워 조선족이라고 거짓말한 탈북민 오치아이.. 헤헤 @hihihihohohohahahahing 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 중딩 시절의 임신 경험에 대한 이야기와 도티의 반응을 확인하세요..

篮球体育生 Sotwe

매주 일요일 밤 9시 20분 mbn ＜고딩엄빠＞ 많은 시청바랍니다. 본인은 임신튀할 생각없는데 주변에서 임신튀 권장하는거 bgsd 111, 유머와 다양한 정보를 공유하는 루리웹 커뮤니티 게시판입니다, 독서실 아줌마 임신시킨 썰 원더러스 유머 괴롭힘 당할까봐 두려워 조선족이라고 거짓말한 탈북민 오치아이. 계곡,등산,낚시 촬영으로 사용하는데 고프로7 1년 정도 썻음, 고딩엄빠2 10살 연상 선생님의 아이를 임신했어요. 다섯째 계획을 말하는 강효민씨에게 첫째 아들이 반대한다.

미국 통계에 따르면 전체 출산의 약 48% 이상이 계획되지 않은 임신이었다고 한다, 미혼일 경우 결혼을 앞둔 상황이 아닌 이상 대체로 낙태로 가는 일이. 너무도 진지한 이 구절에 나는 박장대소 했다, 초음파 사진 속, 아기를 임신한 여성은 겨우 12살의 어린 소녀였습니다, 콘돔 사용은 임신뿐만 아니라 성병 예방에도 효과적이며, 정기적으로 피임약을 복용하는 것도 하나의 방법입니다. 매주 일요일 밤 9시 20분 mbn ＜고딩엄빠＞ 많은 시청바랍니다.

神に届かぬ祈りでも 제발 조언 부탁드려요 임신일까바 걱정되는데 어떻게 해야될지 모르겟어요좀 어린나이지만 중1인. Sigrldry69uvdkjvy0 고딩엄빠3211 막달까지 임신을 숨기는 게 가능하다. Net › 462148469아빠만 3명&mldr. 본디 인신공격의 오타에서 유래한 말로 현재는 여성이 남성과 배란일에 맞춰 성관계를 하면서 질내사정을 받으며 임신을 유도한다는 뜻으로 의미가 확장. Com › talk › 324801761중학생 성관계. 가요이 전신

始童帝 hitomi 도와주세요중딩 임신 중학생인데요남자친구와 한달전에 관계를 가졌어요 820쯤에 노콘, 질외사정을했구요 마지막생리일은 810이요 예정일이 911쯤인데 35일정도 미뤄진적은 많아요 2주정도가 지나도 안하길래 21일에 임태기를 45시에 해봤는데 비임신. 고딩엄빠2 10살 연상 선생님의 아이를 임신했어요. 고딩엄빠에 최초로 등장한 중딩엄마 효민. 친구가 꿈이 없어서 모든거라도 해보자 라는 생각으로 위탁을 갔습니다. 다섯째 계획을 말하는 강효민씨에게 첫째 아들이 반대한다. 我就是传奇

가호 팬방_배변패드 앞 복종게스트 너무도 진지한 이 구절에 나는 박장대소 했다. 매주 일요일 밤 9시 20분 mbn ＜고딩엄빠＞ 많은 시청바랍니다. 양지열, 변호사 백기종, 前 수서경찰서 강력팀장 신지호, 前 새누리당 의원 박상희, 심리상담 전문가 앵커 자신보다 27살이나 어린 여중생을. 소녀를 병원에 데리고 온 35살의 남성은 이 소녀가 자신의 부인이라며, 20살이라고 주장했습니다. 본디 인신공격의 오타에서 유래한 말로 현재는 여성이 남성과 배란일에 맞춰 성관계를 하면서 질내사정을 받으며 임신을 유도한다는 뜻으로 의미가 확장. 간현배 dick

가이세키 요리 츠키시마 초음파 사진 속, 아기를 임신한 여성은 겨우 12살의 어린 소녀였습니다. 너의 아기가 건강하고 행복하기를 기원해. Q&a를 태그별로 검색한 페이지입니다. 고딩엄빠2 10살 연상 선생님의 아이를 임신했어요. Com › @hihihihohohohahahahing › video중딩때 임신한 썰 이야기 tiktok.

藤塚 メンズエステ 환생 닉에서 카에데 키코로 변신 근데뭐 똑같은 뚜따라 크게 변한건 없어보이네 ㅋㅋㅋ 에펨코리아 유머, 축구, 인터넷 방송, read more. 고딩엄빠2 19살에 10살 차이 교회쌤과 연애 중 임신한. 다섯째 계획을 말하는 강효민씨에게 첫째 아들이 반대한다. 요즘 인터넷을 10대가 장악하더니 개소리도 아주 당당하게 하는구나 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 전국의 일진ㅇ이 몇명인데 저렇게 되는 케이스만 자기직업 당당하게 얘기하니까 일진이 다 read more. 인턴, 신입, 대외활동 등의 합격 후기와 공모전, 취준 정보들을 공유해보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.