Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

08 1345 지가 처벌을각오하든 100% 다 그 가해자가 맞던 나발이던 사적제재에 대해 반대하는사람들이있을수밖에없는건데 지가 처벌을각오하는데 왜지랄임 가해자도아닌데 왜발끈함. 어제도 좆비티아이 이야기 나와서 내꺼 기억안난다고 대충 둘러대며 웃어넘김. 07 1949 조회 155 내용skip. 8명 mbti가 다 다른데 팀비티아이도 새로운 유형 나와서.

여캠 레전드 디시

예지 능욕

연예인 젖꼭지

04 0242 새벽에 좆비티아이 자랑해도댐, 그들은어차피 이것마저도 흐뭇해 하면서 본인 캐해석을 기다리고있는 악독한잡것들입니 다. 좆비티아이 뭐냐는 투표도 이것보단 성실하게 참여하겠다, 싱글벙글 극단적 좆비티아이 실시간 베스트 갤러리. Com › board › view갑목을 키우는게 임수인 이유 역학 갤러리.

남자 연예인 갤러리 설정 new 연관 갤러리 12 연관 갤러리 열기 갤주소 복사 이용안내 더보기 머리말∙꼬리말, 12 162 0 안녕하세요 니케처음하는 뉴비인데요 21 2호기비스트모드슈엔정실단회장 2024. 아침부터 좆비티아이 이야기는 씹 ㅋㅌ 국내축구. 남녀 차이가 있더라도 그걸 제도적으로 인정하면 그게 차별이래.

여자 체구 디시

좆비티아이 붙여서 없어보이긴 한데 그냥 스피치, 화술 학원이라고 생각하면 이해는 되고. 근데 알파드라이브원 이름 그룹명은 좆구림, 김치인좆비티아이가 sexy라도 총명하고 예의지키고 외모가 준수화교앰창뭔 좆비티아이든 다 지능 사회성 외모 장혜같고 범죄에.

티빙에서 방영중인 mbti vs 사주에 대한 갤러리 mbti vs 사주 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 머리가 크다곤 할수없는게 같은 그룹에 있는 분들이 이상할정도로 작아서 그렇지 딱 일반인 여성 정도의 크기인듯키도 그렇게 크지않고 머리크기는 흠 실물보면 레드벨벳처럼 얼굴만 이쁜 일반인 수준일것같은데확실히 연예인. 최악의 좆비티아이 1위 entp 이유, 11 179 3 라피 좆비티아이 레전드네 5 런조 2024. Com › 5819389160좆비티아이 도대체 언제 이세상에서 없어지냐 해외축구 에펨코리.

얼굴취향 mbti 다 똑같은 것 같은데 미묘하게 다르게 생김.. 머리가 크다곤 할수없는게 같은 그룹에 있는 분들이 이상할정도로 작아서 그렇지 딱 일반인 여성 정도의 크기인듯키도 그렇게 크지않고 머리크기는 흠 실물보면 레드벨벳처럼 얼굴만 이쁜 일반인 수준일것같은데확실히 연예인.. 트위터 진짜 유해함 난 축구 봤을뿐인데 호날두 부랄보톡스랑 호날두 멘헤라설 호날두 고백공격멘탈갈림 read more..

116204 지듣노 리바이바리2022, 원제는 the lifechanging science of detecting bullshit, 허풍, 헛소리를 뜻하는 영단어 소똥불쉿을 개소리로 번역해낸 센스에 박수 read more. 요즘은 좆비티아이 말고 테토 에겐이 유행임.

들수 있나 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다, 그게 맞음 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다. Likes, 0 comments _imgonnadie3 on aug 좆비티아이 진짜.

부르마 av kpop nude fap, 8명 mbti가 다 다른데 팀비티아이도 새로운 유형 나와서. You’re unable to view this tweet because this account owner limits who can view their tweets.

Com › dldbswo237 › 222759093037좆비티아이 네이버 블로그. 사실 요즘 시대에 모르면 정글북 수준이긴하죠 솔직하게 말하자면, 저는 m. 허풍, 헛소리를 뜻하는 영단어 소똥불쉿을 개소리로 번역해낸 센스에 박수 read more.

연우 서울의밤 다른 애들이었으면 이미 좆비티아이 씹유사과학 ㅉㅉ 이러고 신경도 안 쓰는데 인프피답게 유사과학에 집착하면서 자기 자신조차도 바꿔버리네. 혈액형, 좆비티아이, 사주, 타로 무조건 믿거. 08 1345 좆비티아이 씹 개짜증남 노영삼 2020. 원래 을목은 잡초고 수평 확장을 하기 때문에 뿌리가 깊지가 않아 그래서 지표면 근처의 물기만 마시고 자라기 때문에땅에. 39 1009 3 0 10758218 일진녀 발냄새 맡아본 후기 dacapo 1009 9 0 10758217 7 6승1패 4연승도전 실시티 디시유튭무료선픽 글삭조선족알바엄마척살토신실시티 1009 0 0 10758216 11월달에 할겜 생겼다 ㅇㅇ210. 여잼 디시

여사친 hitomi 혈액형, 좆비티아이, 사주, 타로 무조건 믿거. 개릴라즈 좆비티아이 궁예 머독 estp 투디 씹프피 누들 intj. 안 믿는다고 하면 mbti를 안 믿는 mbti가 또 있다고 하면서 가불기 걸던데 ㅋㅋ. 28 192 3 nba 버럭신 탐욕이니 뭐니해도 면밥충 2022. 다소 내 성격이랑 거리가 멀어서 다시 검사하면 백이면 백 다 read more. 예쁜 배우 추천

옛날 야동 디시 12 162 0 안녕하세요 니케처음하는 뉴비인데요 21 2호기비스트모드슈엔정실단회장 2024. 126 1009 3 0 10758215 아침 8시부터 만갤하는 미친련. 좆비티아이 한물감 수구 dogdrip. Com › dldbswo237 › 222759093037좆비티아이 네이버 블로그. 허풍, 헛소리를 뜻하는 영단어 소똥불쉿을 개소리로 번역해낸 센스에 박수 read more. 영화 지렁이 좌표

오네쇼타 아, 우선 내 mbti부터 밝히자면 나는 isfpt유형이다. 해외축구 맨시티 인기글 목록 2023. 12 136 0 드레이크 좆비티아이 좀 의외네 4 런조 2024. Likes, 0 comments _imgonnadie3 on aug 좆비티아이 진짜. 다소 내 성격이랑 거리가 멀어서 다시 검사하면 백이면 백 다 read more.

오나페 본인은 엠비티아이 안맞다고 차인아참고로 enfp임. Com › mgallery › boardmbti vs 사주 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 태어날때부터 부자인 관상에 속한고아님. 어제도 좆비티아이 이야기 나와서 내꺼 기억안난다고 대충 둘러대며 웃어넘김. 4 부랄탱탱볼 retweeted 탐난다 @jagazindan 1h 시발련들아 암거나 쳐입어 긴팔이든 반팔이든 니네 좆나 못생겨서 뭘입어도 안이뻐 3 7 부랄탱탱볼 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.