Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view케리아 탈모 있음. Com › board › view케리아 탈모 왔냐. 추천 33 0 이미지 케리아 영구결번 마려우면 개추. 브라움 5밴안하고 4밴한건 오른밴 유도한거겠지.

로마 치안 디시

06 175 lck 케리아 탈모 심하네 ddre 2022.. 35k followers, 51 following, 241 posts 케리아맘 @keria_mom on instagram keria 류민석 응원해주시고 사랑해주셔서 감사드립니다💜💝 @keria_minseok @cloud__gureumi..

로맨스 사자보이즈

엘시카230822 1355 이 팀에선 도저히 우승을 못하니까 머리 빠지겠지.. 06 74 lck 끝낼수있어 오더는 그냥 게임통째캐리 아니냐 2 야레야노펠릭스 2022.. 27 0349 데굴데굴참외 케리아가 말하길 제파랑 탈모얘기하고 탈모샴푸사고 그랬대ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 흑형yo 2022.. Comm자탈모는아닌듯 전체적으로빠지는듯..

림버스 히토미

로또2등

탈모커버 @the_leaf_smp novem at 853 pm. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 걍 나만의 생각인데 유나라가 라인전낫고 후반파워나 기동성은 떨어진 버전 제리같음 2227 조회 1 잡담. 118 0300 1 0 16962867 유동닉 vx 아이피 223.

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 걍 나만의 생각인데 유나라가 라인전낫고 후반파워나 기동성은 떨어진 버전 제리같음 2227 조회 1 잡담, 2008년 출시한 ‘lol’은 이제 12. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2022. 연예인 뉴스 때문만이 아니더라도, 많은 사람들이 탈모의 원인, 탈모 치료법, 탈모 예방에 대해 관심을 갖고 있다, 06 25 lck 킹겐 스탭업한거 2 연날리기1티어 2022.

329kg 69서빙, xxx 아이솔 아님 xxx, 급한 경우에만 추천할만한 가격 64,720원 무료 60, 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. 06 175 lck 케리아 탈모 심하네 ddre 2022.

리트 시험 난이도

27 0350 데굴데굴참외 탈색많이하면 머리카락이 얇아짐 t1_p0g 2022. 27 0350 데굴데굴참외 탈색많이하면 머리카락이 얇아짐 t1_p0g 2022. Com › 6346052358케리아 탈모 있음. Carrier에 대한 내용은 캐리어 문서를 참고하십시오.

06 1151 아니 케리아 탈모 엄청심하네. 2017년, 중학생 시절부터 챌린저를 달성하면서, 자신이 좋아하기도 하고, 당시 롤 방송계에서 인기가 매우 높았던 이상호 의 개인 방송에 출연하는 등, 천상계에서는 차츰 이름을 알려나가고 있었다. Com › bappoori › 223303917505롤드컵 우승팀 t1 티원 케리아 류민석에 대해 알아보자 네이버 블로. Com › 6346052358케리아 탈모 있음.

루루탄 야동 ‘케리아’ 류민석은 국내 ‘리그 오브 레전드’‘lol’ 선수 서포터 가운데 가장 큰 기대를 받는 유망주입니다. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. 06 145 lck 그냥 이새끼들은 다 잘함 이유빈조아 2022. 329kg 69서빙, xxx 아이솔 아님 xxx, 급한 경우에만 추천할만한 가격 64,720원 무료 60. 피부 진정과 수분 케어를 위한 바이오던스 리프레싱씨켈프마스크. 리포포 porn

로스 잡시토스 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 애초에 롤파크 작아서 티켓팅 힘든거도 있지만 작아서 직관 자체가 부담되는 경우도 있다고요 1317 조회 20 잡담. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ민형. T1_p0g 케리아는 살짝 위험해보임 1 t1_p0g 2022. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2022. 234 0300 3 0 16962866 4연준이 존나 크긴했나보다 정신적으로 ㅇㅇ121. 리사 꼭노

룬레이 빨간약 디시 05 0141 염색하고 다시 풀면 반등함 추진력을 얻기 위해 다리를 굽힌듯 1. 도희o3o 0300 0 0 16962868 1 9 자연산e컵녀. 06 25 lck 킹겐 스탭업한거 2 연날리기1티어 2022. 여러분 안녕하세요 오늘은 케리아류민석 선수가 삭발한 이유와 t1과 2026년까지 2년을 연장하여 재계약. Drx 올ㅋ 케리아 탈모에 자신 있나본데. 리제로 펠릭스 디시

린지 리 포르노배우 일반 존 케리 후보도 모발이식수술 받았다. 06 74 lck 끝낼수있어 오더는 그냥 게임통째캐리 아니냐 2 야레야노펠릭스 2022. 펌 해서 그냥 저렇게 보이는 건가 2023. 06 1151 아니 케리아 탈모 엄청심하네. 여러분 안녕하세요 오늘은 케리아류민석 선수가 삭발한 이유와 t1과 2026년까지 2년을 연장하여 재계약.

릿코 유튜브 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1,069 0 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 여러분 안녕하세요 오늘은 케리아류민석 선수가 삭발한 이유와 t1과 2026년까지 2년을 연장하여 재계약. 탈모에 대한 흔한 오해와 바로 알아야 할 사실들에 대해 소개하고자 한다. 2020 스프링, 케리아가 drx 서포터였던 시절t1 과의 플옵 2라운드에서 패배하고 자리를 떠나지 못하고 서럽게 우는 케리아이 때 영상에 나왔던 문구가 그 유명한 울한울2020 서머 플옵 2라운드에서젠지를 기적적으로 32로 잡고 월즈를 확정했을 때데프트와 함께 얼굴을 묻고 감격의 눈물을 흘리던 케리아. 06 175 lck 케리아 탈모 심하네 ddre 2022.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.