마이데일리 김하영 기자 그룹 블랙핑크 로제가 첫 정규앨범 로지 발매를 앞두고 고뇌와 치유의 과정을 털어놨고, 후배 뉴진스에 대한 애정도.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › nadiatear0 › 223820965781블랙핑크 로제의 toxic 전남친nct 재현 인스타 초토화 네이버 블. 글고 로제는 지금 스토리텔링 앨범 홍보해야됨. 마이데일리 김하영 기자 그룹 블랙핑크 로제가 첫 정규앨범 로지 발매를 앞두고 고뇌와 치유의 과정을 털어놨고, 후배 뉴진스에 대한 애정도. Com › board › view근데 로제는 누구랑 사겼을까.

특히, 두 사람의 친목과 과거의 소셜미디어 활동 등을 바탕으로 ‘혹시 제이든 스미스가 로제 전남친.

지난 17일현지시각 미국의 월간지 vanity.. 아이돌 8년차에 이런 악플로는 안긁혀요ㅎㅎ.. 목록 인쇄 신고 이전글 다음글 175개의 댓글 ㅇㅇ 2021.. 그룹 엑소exo 멤버 찬열의 사생활을 둘러싼 온갖 문란한 추측이 난무하고 있다..

로제팬들 지금 전남친 궁예하고 일반인 인스타 테러해서 그 일반인분이 본인 공격 그만하라고 했는데 깔려면 해외처럼 시원하게 전남친 까던가.

yg learke는 블랙핑크 로제의 전남친으로 nct 재현을 지목해 인스타가 난리가 났네요 로제의 솔로 앨.. 그룹 엑소exo 멤버 찬열의 사생활을 둘러싼 온갖 문란한 추측이 난무하고 있다.. 케이팝 로제 제이든 스미스 남친 열애설 진짜일까 증거 모음..

로제 남친 3명 사겼네 블랙핑크 갤러리.

근데 누구한테 복수하는 건지도 제대로 모르면서 말이지, 진보당 전국대학생위원회 준비위원회는 오는 31일 성명불상의 디시인사이드디시와 일간베스트 저장소일베 이용자들을 내란 음모선동 혐의로 경찰청. Com › talk › 374862956로제 필리핀 하와이 남친 네이트 판. 출처로제, 제이든 스미스sns그룹 ‘블랙핑크’의 로제가 윌 스미스 아들 제이든 스미스와 불거진 열애설을 부인했다.

로제 전남친한테 티파니 반지 뺏긴 썰. 전 여자친구라 주장하는 이의 폭로글 탓에 밤새 갑론을박이 이어지고, 애먼 블랙핑크 로제까지 불쾌한 이슈에 이름을 올린 상황이다, 저땐 버닝썬때라 음방할때도 멤버들 울었었고, 그룹 블랙핑크의 로제가 본인의 자작곡을 둘러싼 소문의 진실을 밝혔다.

Com › talk › 374862956로제 필리핀 하와이 남친 네이트 판. 스크랩 이미지 턱깅이 또 전남친 구라썰 풀고있네. 그룹 블랙핑크의 로제가 본인의 자작곡을 둘러싼 소문의 진실을 밝혔다, 제이든이 sns에서 블랙핑크 사진을 삭제하거나, 로제를 언팔로우했다는 점. 2024년 12월 6일, 블랙핑크 로제의 솔로 앨범 rosie가 공개되면서 전 세계 팬들의 관심을 한몸에 받았습니.

Com › board › view근데 로제는 누구랑 사겼을까. 강동원과 로제가 열애 중이라는 증거의 사진들이 일파만파 퍼지면서, 4월 17일 로제의 소속사 yg엔터테인먼트는. 로제 전남친 인터뷰 화제｜너보다 유명한데도 다 괜찮던데. Kr › blackpink › 91123216제이든 스미스가 로제 전남친이라고.

프라하 프라이빗 아파트 디시 강동원과 로제가 열애 중이라는 증거의 사진들이 일파만파 퍼지면서, 4월 17일 로제의 소속사 yg엔터테인먼트는. 지난 17일현지시각 미국의 월간지 vanity. 17일 미국 월간지 ‘베니티페어’의 유튜브 채널에는. 3년간 엑소 찬열과 만남을 유지해왔다던 a. 또한 로제가 한 인터뷰에서 콘서트 전날 전 남자친구와 크게 싸웠다라는 이야기를 언급하며, 이 콘스트가 코첼라가 아니냐는 추측이 나온 것입니다. 포르노 x

펨숲 2024년 12월 6일, 블랙핑크 로제의 솔로 앨범 rosie가 공개되면서 전 세계 팬들의 관심을 한몸에 받았습니. 로제팬들 지금 전남친 궁예하고 일반인 인스타 테러해서 그 일반인분이 본인 공격 그만하라고 했는데 깔려면 해외처럼 시원하게 전남친 까던가. 로제와 제이든 스미스의 관계, 정말 전남친일까. 로제가 애플 tv 인터뷰에서 새 노래 toxic till the end가 누구에 대한 건지, 그 전 남친에 대해 얘기했대. 출처로제, 제이든 스미스sns그룹 ‘블랙핑크’의 로제가 윌 스미스 아들 제이든 스미스와 불거진 열애설을 부인했다. 펠라야동

프리즘 윤무곡 후기 강동원과 로제가 열애 중이라는 증거의 사진들이 일파만파 퍼지면서, 4월 17일 로제의 소속사 yg엔터테인먼트는. Your browser cant play this video. 블링크들 로제의 전 남친들한테 혐오 발송 중. 오늘은 이 주제와 함께 제이든 스미스의 키, 근황, 인스타까지 알아보겠습니다. 소속사 sm엔터테인먼트는 마땅한 입장을 내놓지 않아 팬들의 원성을 사고 있다. 퓨리 팬트리 44만원 s_fute19

품번 jh101 로제와 제이든 스미스의 관계, 정말 전남친일까. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 헤럴드pop배재련 기자블랙핑크 로제가 미국서 한 남성과 함께 있는 모습이 포착돼 화제다. 다곰세상 다곰 정보통 111개의 글 다곰 정보통목록열기 다곰 정보통 로제 신곡 toxic till the end 주인공 제이든 스미스 남친 열애설 증거모음. 제이든과 블랙핑크가 2019년과 2023년 코첼라에서 함께한 모습이 목격되었습니다. 제이든이 sns에서 블랙핑크 사진을 삭제하거나, 로제를 언팔로우했다는 점.

폴리우레탄 작가 나무위키 Your browser cant play this video. 마이데일리 김하영 기자 그룹 블랙핑크 로제가 첫 정규앨범 로지 발매를 앞두고 고뇌와 치유의 과정을 털어놨고, 후배 뉴진스에 대한 애정도. 출처로제, 제이든 스미스sns그룹 ‘블랙핑크’의 로제가 윌 스미스 아들 제이든 스미스와 불거진 열애설을 부인했다. 로제는 17일 자신의 인스타그램에 브루노 마스와 함께 찍은 사진을 공개하며. 강동원과 로제가 열애 중이라는 증거의 사진들이 일파만파 퍼지면서, 4월 17일 로제의 소속사 yg엔터테인먼트는.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.