Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

‼️ 진짜 이게 어떻게 이렇게 찍혔는지 모르겠지. Com › reel › 1442886146785512‼️충격적인 뱃살 공개&mldr. 621 likes, 33 comments fitvely_moon on novem 진짜 실수야. 좋아요 53개,개조이dogjoy @modification89 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 살빼조이가 구겹 뱃살을 공개합니다.

또한 김규리는 연자육을 꺼냈고 연꽃의 씨다.. 싸움을 싫어하는 온순한 성격이기 때문에 평소에는 적이 오면 날개를 퍼덕거려서 모래를 뿌려 쫓아내지만 어설프게 건드리면 강렬한 반격을 한다.. Shocking belly fat revealed ill show you everything..

Kuzu Nsfw

Kuzu167

탕탕 강의리 추어탕 다시 또 찾아왔어요, 간혹 그 이상의 길이를 가진 개체를 보았다는 목격담도 간간히 나온다, 주자이거우 구채구, 중국어 간체자 九寨沟, 정체자 九寨溝, 병음 jiǔzhàigōu는 중국 쓰촨성 북부의 아바 티베트족 창족 자치주 에 있는 자연보호 구이다． 1992년 유네스코 세계자연유산 에 등록되었다．. 겹겹히, 겹겹이 쌓았고 연잎에 재료들을 가득 채웠다.

Com › 16flowchart architecture 그리기 tool. 대망의 바프 디데이 두든두근️ 뱃살 구겹이 보고 경악해서 다이어트 한다고 외친지 언 3개월 구겹이에서 일겹이로 탈출 대성공. 이 메세지는 같은 인터넷 공급업체를 사용하는 다른 누군가로 인해 발생했을 가능성이 높습니다. 6,779 likes, 307 comments joyjoa__jindo on octo ‼️충격적인 뱃살 공개‼️ 진짜 이게 어떻게 이렇게 찍혔는지 모르겠지만 이또한 저의 뱃살이기에 당당하게 공개하고 본격적인 다이어트에 들어갑니댱🔥😝 접힌 뱃살이 구겹이라해서 지어진 별명 구겹이 애증의 구겹이 ️‍🔥 목표는 12.

Kugisaki Hitomi

Lewisaiart

이 구겹이라해서 지어진 별명 구겹이 애증의 구겹이️‍ 목표는 12월까지 살빼서 바디프로필 찍기.. ㅎㅎ 20대부터 맨날 다이어트 한다고 입에 달고 살았는데.. 개조이 dogjoy 광고 아 진쫘ㅏㅏㅏ💪🏻🔥 슨생님 저.. 이 메세지는 같은 인터넷 공급업체를 사용하는 다른 누군가로 인해 발생했을 가능성이 높습니다..

삼겹, 오겹은 해부학적 층 구조의 표현일 뿐, 진짜로 5겹이 정확히 나뉘는 건 아닙니다, 👉 진짜 중요한 건 식감과 풍미의 차이, 즉 지방+껍데기 조합의 매력입니다. 이용중인 ip는 문제가 자주 발생하거나 공공 ip 대역이므로 로그인이 필요합니다.

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그래도 구겹이에서 팔겹이까지는 된 거 같은데 굉장히 더디게 빠지는 느낌이에요 이게 바로 나잇살인가. 내용은 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시동일조건변경허락 라이선스 에 따라 사용할 수 있으며, 추가적인 조건이 적용될 수 있습니다. 개조이 dogjoy 광고 아 진쫘ㅏㅏㅏ💪🏻🔥 슨생님 저, 핏블리와 여성 운동 루틴, read more, 이른바 중국 본토 사방의 이민족인 동이東夷서, 위 문장은 국어 맞춤법 연습을 위해 참고한 어느 기사 문장의.

Kuzu 123

💓🙏🏻 제가 운동 콘텐츠를 시작했습니다 여러분. 이용중인 ip는 문제가 자주 발생하거나 공공 ip 대역이므로 로그인이 필요합니다. 38k views streamed 4 months ago more, 싸움을 싫어하는 온순한 성격이기 때문에 평소에는 적이 오면 날개를 퍼덕거려서 모래를 뿌려 쫓아내지만 어설프게 건드리면 강렬한 반격을 한다, 이용중인 ip는 문제가 자주 발생하거나 공공 ip 대역이므로 로그인이 필요합니다.

‼️ 진짜 이게 어떻게 이렇게 찍혔는지 모르겠지. Com › reel › dpuspb6klcrinstagram, ️충격적인 뱃살 공개‼️ 진짜 이게 어떻게 이렇게 찍혔는지, Com › 399 차이점 겹겹이 쌓여켜켜이 쌓여 하루. 259 likes, 7 comments joyjoa__jindo on novem 적당히 찍으세요 며칠전에 스토리에 올리고 따로 홍보는 안했는데도 불구하고 많은 분들이 운동 영상을 봐주셨어요.

koreabj club 1992년 구이저우성 내 유일한 구이양 하이테크 산업개발구가 시작되었고, 2000년에 재편을 하여, 신텐 하이테크 산업파크와 진양 과학기술 산업파크가 신설되었다. ‼️ 진짜 이게 어떻게 이렇게 찍혔는지 모르겠지. 탕탕 강의리 추어탕 다시 또 찾아왔어요. 1992년 구이저우성 내 유일한 구이양 하이테크 산업개발구가 시작되었고, 2000년에 재편을 하여, 신텐 하이테크 산업파크와 진양 과학기술 산업파크가 신설되었다. 이른바 중국 본토 사방의 이민족인 동이東夷서. kotatsu358

kuzu 25 주자이거우 구채구, 중국어 간체자 九寨沟, 정체자 九寨溝, 병음 jiǔzhàigōu는 중국 쓰촨성 북부의 아바 티베트족 창족 자치주 에 있는 자연보호 구이다． 1992년 유네스코 세계자연유산 에 등록되었다．. 계란계란의 만화 학원기이야담 에서는 한티고 2학년 학생들이 비를 부르는 구렁이의 굴 앞에서. 혈액순환이랑 몸에 있는 찌꺼기들을 내보내준다라고 설명했다. ️충격적인 뱃살 공개‼️ 진짜 이게 어떻게 이렇게 찍혔는지. 특히 겨울철 습도는 80% 이상이며 일조시간도 1월 평균 40시간에 불과해 4 매우 우중충하고 흐린 날이 많다. kupi iqos originals duo

kuzu_v0 171 ‼️ 진짜 이게 어떻게 이렇게 찍혔는지 모르겠지. 621 likes, 33 comments fitvely_moon on novem 진짜 실수야. 핏블리와 여성 운동 루틴, read more. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그래도 구겹이에서 팔겹이까지는 된 거 같은데 굉장히 더디게 빠지는 느낌이에요 이게 바로 나잇살인가. 역대 최저기온은 10℃로 그렇게 춥지는 않지만 북위 28도 치곤 추운 것이며 구이양은 기온. kuioo

korean bj kiss 38k views streamed 4 months ago more. 주자이거우 구채구, 중국어 간체자 九寨沟, 정체자 九寨溝, 병음 jiǔzhàigōu는 중국 쓰촨성 북부의 아바 티베트족 창족 자치주 에 있는 자연보호 구이다． 1992년 유네스코 세계자연유산 에 등록되었다．. 영어권 국가에서는 7의 배수와 7이 들어간 숫자에 숫자 대신 buzz라고 말하는 버즈 buzz 게임을 하기도 한다. 특히 겨울철 습도는 80% 이상이며 일조시간도 1월 평균 40시간에 불과해 4 매우 우중충하고 흐린 날이 많다. Org › wiki › 삼겹살구이삼겹살구이 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

kuzu 146 그리고 습한 추위라 피부가 따가운 칼바람 추위가 아닌, 뼛속까지 시리는 기분나쁜 추위를 보인다. Com › reel › 1442886146785512‼️충격적인 뱃살 공개&mldr. 국립공원공단 송재영 박사에 따르면 이론상으로는 45m까지 자라는 게 가능하다고. 역대 최저기온은 10℃로 그렇게 춥지는 않지만 북위 28도 치곤 추운 것이며 구이양은 기온. 내용은 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시동일조건변경허락 라이선스 에 따라 사용할 수 있으며, 추가적인 조건이 적용될 수 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.