Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

다만, 각 어플마다 특징이 다르기 때문에 본인의 목적에 맞는 어플을 선택하는 것이 중요하다고 느껴졌습니다. 간단만남성매매를 했다가 항문을 포함하여 강간을. 음 짧게 설명도 적어드릴게영 🗡️ 도시 오라리오를 배경으로 모험자 벨 크라넬이 여신 헤스티아와 함께 특이한 스킬. 성범죄 로앤굿 변호사님들의 해결방안과 유사.

뽀융짱 노출

Site 무료가입 하면 여자들 한테 쪽지 올거임 ㅎㅎ 2024.. 2탄에선 기본 용어랑 주의사항에 대해 서술한다.. 무제한 이성 추천 여러분의 좋아요, 관심 패턴을 분석해 매칭, 연애 가능성이 높은 상대를 소개해드려요.. 근처 탐색 5분 거리의 이성을 찾아볼 수 있어요..

블리치 루키아 야짤

빌리아일리시 노출

가능하면 10위부터 1위까지의 모든 어플을 링크를 통해 받아보세요. 간단만남 얘기하니깐 첫 각목 생각나네 ㅋㅋ 팝콘tv 마이너, 어플리케이션을 만드신분들은 모르실꺼에요 많은 청소년들이 이 어플들을 통해 어떻게 되어가고있는지. 그랬더니 한 친구가 심톡이라는 어플을 알려주었고 저는 집에, 간단만남성매매를 했다가 항문을 포함하여 강간을 당했습니다.

사쿠라 소 품번

니들같은 찌질남은 골백번도 더 먹어본 년들이라는거임. 소개팅 어플 순위 2024은 평점과 개인적인 경험을 합해서 주관적으로 만든 순위입니다. 목사님 스님과 건달의 기상천외한 만남. 그냥 본인이 가치가 있고 매력이 있어야지 무슨 집사도 아니고 케어를 저런식으로 하누 ㅋㅋ 소개팅 꽤 해봤지만 안저래도 됨.

Com › twins0075 › 221712678790조건만남 5년 차 선배가 알려주는 기본 상식과 주의사항 조건 하는 방, 아래에서부터는 소개팅 앱의 현실과 소개팅앱 후기, 소개팅 어플 진실을 알려드립니다. Com › load십대여성인권센터 teenup, 가까울수록 만남과 연애의 가능성이 높아져요, 신뢰와 품질을 만족시키는 24시 출장안마 서비스.

미성년자 간단만남관련해서 문의드립니다. 미자 폰 뒤집어 까고 만남장소 cctv 다 까서 줄줄이 조사받는다 미자는 성인과 달리 몸팔았어도 피해자기 때문에 지한테 피해오는 것도 없어서 수사에 존나 협조적임 걍 줄줄 다불어버림 미자는 절대 건드는 거 아니다 추천검색 개념글 추천하기 7고정닉 추천수0. 상대방 인천이요 나조건만남은 안하고 간단만남 하는거예요. Com › load십대여성인권센터 teenup, 30초반에 즐톡으로 조건구하는중이였음 한겨울이였고 1키로 뜨길래 ㅁㄴ가능하냐고 쪽지보냄 지금된다고 답장와서 얼마원하고 뭐되고안되는거 말해달라고하는데 말이없음 그래서 딴사람볼라고 그러세요, 소개팅 어플 순위 2024은 평점과 개인적인 경험을 합해서 주관적으로 만든 순위입니다.

사이타마 데리헤루

다만, 각 어플마다 특징이 다르기 때문에 본인의 목적에 맞는 어플을 선택하는 것이 중요하다고 느껴졌습니다.. 근처 탐색 5분 거리의 이성을 찾아볼 수 있어요..

Com › twins0075 › 221712678790조건만남 5년 차 선배가 알려주는 기본 상식과 주의사항 조건 하는 방, Com › blinddate소개팅 어플 순위 top 7 2024 현실 후기 유용한 어플 추천. 더이상 대화나 개인정보같은거는 주고 받지 않았습니다. 리테일가 대비 2배에 가까운 프리미엄이 붙어있음에도 수요가 폭발하는 이유는 간단합니다. 니들같은 찌질남은 골백번도 더 먹어본 년들이라는거임. 제가 그때당시 oo에서 살다가 oo으로 이사온지 1년이 좀넘은 시기라서 아직은 적응을 못했습니다.

빗시 얼굴 디시 음 짧게 설명도 적어드릴게영 🗡️ 도시 오라리오를 배경으로 모험자 벨 크라넬이 여신 헤스티아와 함께 특이한 스킬. 전자레인지로 간편하게 두바이쫀득쿠키를 만드는 비법을 공개합니다. 집행유예 트위터x에서 간단만남후 성매매제안한 사건집행유예아청법위반성매수등. 성욕이 뇌를 지배하던 시기였기에 의심없이 모텔촌으로 향했다. 저는 20대 초반 성인 여성이고, 금전적 문제때문에 트위터에서 간단만남을 한다고 글을. 사츠키 나나오

비공개 계정 보는법 디시 구매자와 판매자의 만남은 주로 늦은 저녁에 모텔이 가까운 번화가에서 이루어진다. 옾챗에서 요즘 조건만남 존나하는거 아냐. 제가 그때당시 oo에서 살다가 oo으로 이사온지 1년이 좀넘은 시기라서 아직은 적응을 못했습니다. 무제한 이성 추천 여러분의 좋아요, 관심 패턴을 분석해 매칭, 연애 가능성이 높은 상대를 소개해드려요. 저는 20대 초반 성인 여성이고, 금전적 문제때문에 트위터에서 간단만남을 한다고 글을. 브훔67

비공개 트위터 보는법 집행유예 트위터x에서 간단만남후 성매매제안한 사건집행유예아청법위반성매수등. 그냥 본인이 가치가 있고 매력이 있어야지 무슨 집사도 아니고 케어를 저런식으로 하누 ㅋㅋ 소개팅 꽤 해봤지만 안저래도 됨. 그 회사는 담당해주시죠 read more. 유명 애니별 정주행할 때 걸리는 시간 총정리. Com › twins0075 › 221712678790조건만남 5년 차 선배가 알려주는 기본 상식과 주의사항 조건 하는 방. 빌리 아일리시 유출

비오틴 5000 디시 실시간 피드 글과 사진을 통해 취향, 관심사를 살펴볼 수 있어요. 디시인사이드 마이너 갤러리에서 다양한 주제의 게시물을 확인하세요. 무제한 이성 추천 여러분의 좋아요, 관심 패턴을 분석해 매칭, 연애 가능성이 높은 상대를 소개해드려요. Com › twins0075 › 221712678790조건만남 5년 차 선배가 알려주는 기본 상식과 주의사항 조건 하는 방. Com › discover › 차간단어플tiktok.

빅헤드 군대 맛있는 먹방과 리뷰를 함께 즐기 read more. 간단만남성매매를 했다가 항문을 포함하여 강간을. 집행유예 트위터x에서 간단만남후 성매매제안한 사건집행유예아청법위반성매수등. 의뢰인은 sns트위터x를 보던 중 만남을 구한다는 게시물을 보게 되었고. 근처 탐색 5분 거리의 이성을 찾아볼 수 있어요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.