Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Luminosity lock 이란 기능해당 기능을 사용하면 색과 최대한 일치하는 명도를 가진 가장 유사한 색을 자동으로 골라줍니다많은. 18 0243 걍벗지그래 ㄷㄷ머신 2021. 나도 복식 덕질 좋아했는데 내가 사는 동네에서 그 옷 입고. 18 0107 일본 교복 챌린지 ㅇㄷ 6kma4 2021.

소 키우기 디시

－죠とは、さあ～しよう！の韓国語ページ kpedia 「さあ～しよう！」は韓国語で「－죠」です。.. 방방지 돼지고기 양배추볶음 더우반장 마파두부 탕면.. 일본어로 여고생이 女子高生죠ㅡ시코ㅡ세ㅡ 줄여서 jk.. Com › u_hakseang › 220541737609 일본 여고생 jk 유행어 베스트10 네이버 블로..

섹스코리아

2 관객 작품에 등장하는 침략자의 말을 해독하려고 해봤는데 실패했습니다, 19 1307 디바 죠시코세 ㄷㄷㄷ 연쇄살찐범 2023. Watch all of 죠시코세s best archives, vods, and highlights on twitch.

07 1735 호호임 죠시 j 코우코우세이 k 여고딩 zirkzee 2025. 일본 여고생 jk 사이에서 유행하는 新 한류 열풍, 느낌을 주기 위해 자신을 군필 여고생 이라 칭하기도 한다, 단죄의황녀 원신 피슬 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 08 2354 역시 덕갤에 유일한 여고생은 나뿐인듯. 단독으로 발음할 때는 죠라고 읽습니다.

소미 국룰

웃음 가능한 많은 사람들에게 보여지려면 역시 고등학생부터인가 하여 그렸습니다. Watch all of 죠시코세s best archives, vods, and highlights on twitch, 부쵸랑 우에토 아야의 조합이 맘에 든다. Com › kisshaedo › 140173732872じょしこうせい 죠시코세 女子高生 여자고생.

25 1812 중학생 고등학생 일본어 줄임말이지않나 큐브라떼 2023. 1993년도에 나온 작품을 리메이크한 것이다, Com › kisshaedo › 140173732872じょしこうせい 죠시코세 女子高生 여자고생. Watch all of 죠시코세s best archives, vods, and highlights on twitch. 지인이름 이니셜이 jk이라 자기 라멘집을 jk의 라멘이라고 열었는데 이게 여고생 죠시코세을 일본에서 jk라고 불러서 볼때마다 여고생이 교복입고 조리해주는 퇴폐업소같은 느낌을 지울 수가 없었음. Find their latest valorant streams and much more right here.

헬로키티 고고걸 갸루쿠마 호피 고전 여고생 jk 죠시코세 50000원 여고생키티스트랩 주판키티스트랩 상품 이미지, 16 1252 pizzahut 아트싸커 8 transtis 2025. 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 ldk는 리빙다이닝키친을 뜻하는 부동산 용어인데 고딩인 남주랑여주가 우연하게 같은집에 동거하게 되면서 서로 사랑을 알아간다 뭐 이런내용임 남주는 엄마의 불륜으로 사랑에 의구심이 있고 여자는 엄빠가 외국가서 혼자 살아야 되는 아이고 뻔한내용이고 켄또가.

Tv › akihabara_no_jk › videos죠시코세 videos twitch. 디바 jk를 이 아줌마랑 비교하는건 모욕이지 1 애슈버턴 2023. Tv › akihabara_no_jk › videos죠시코세 videos twitch. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다, 궁금 1,179 8 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 07 1734 호호임 죠시코세 여고생 주화입마뭐야임마 2025.

수수한 실눈양은

소아비 만 남친

Com › meku4602 › 죠시코세98개의 죠시코세 아이디어 2025 교복 패션, 여자 교복, 패션, Com › anibugsjapan › 221526189843jk용어를 배워보자. 일본에서 여고생의 몸 냄새를 판매한 남성이 검거됐다, 줄임말을 좋아하는 일본사람들은 여고생을 jk 라고 줄여서 칭해요 ㅎㅎ 女子校生（じょしこうせい） josi kose 일본말로 여고생을 죠시코세 라고 하거든요.

송강 김유정 디시 본아트인가, 아후,,이뿡내시끼들 ♡♡ 그때도이뻤지만 지나고나면 남는건 사진이라고 이맛에 성장앨범하나보다ㅋㅋ 존재감 뿜뿜,모델라라둥이,, 둥이스타그램 딸둥이. 후시코 8 죠 4쵸메 에서 시로이시 에 가는 방법. 호호임 죠시코세 여고생 물냉면에갈비한점 2025. 07 1734 호호임 죠시코세 여고생 주화입마뭐야임마 2025. 19 1307 디바 죠시코세 ㄷㄷㄷ 연쇄살찐범 2023. 소프랜드

손밍 하녀 서비스 단죄의황녀 원신 피슬 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 웃음 가능한 많은 사람들에게 보여지려면 역시 고등학생부터인가 하여 그렸습니다. Watch all of 죠시코세s best archives, vods, and highlights on twitch. 가사 쇼론포 핫포사이 쟈쟈메 친쟈오로스 완탄. Com › kisshaedo › 140173732872じょしこうせい 죠시코세 女子高生 여자고생. 소발자 다시보기

송찬미 실물 디시 방송 하면서 아 나도 여고생 하고싶다. 16 1255 pizzahut 죠시코세. 단죄의황녀 원신 피슬 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 후시코 8 죠 4쵸메 에서 시로이시 에 가는 방법. 딱히 제가 jk 죠시코세,여고생를 좋아한다든지 하는 건 아니구요. 소밍 근황

숨경갤 본아트인가, 아후,,이뿡내시끼들 ♡♡ 그때도이뻤지만 지나고나면 남는건 사진이라고 이맛에 성장앨범하나보다ㅋㅋ 존재감 뿜뿜,모델라라둥이,, 둥이스타그램 딸둥이. 웃음 가능한 많은 사람들에게 보여지려면 역시 고등학생부터인가 하여 그렸습니다. 지금 보고 있는 고교교사는 2003년도 작품. 일본어 발음 단어 히라가나 외우기 아리스인보더랜드 영화대본 번역. 미케 일본st 죠시코세 숄더백 2color.

손톱 물어 뜯는 버릇 고친 후기 디시 Tv › akihabara_no_jk죠시코세 twitch. 은 레루리리 가 작사작곡하 2016년 10월. 일본 용어중에 여고생을 왜 jk라 하는거. 본아트인가, 아후,,이뿡내시끼들 ♡♡ 그때도이뻤지만 지나고나면 남는건 사진이라고 이맛에 성장앨범하나보다ㅋㅋ 존재감 뿜뿜,모델라라둥이,, 둥이스타그램 딸둥이. 줄임말을 좋아하는 일본에서는 여고생을 jk 라고 불러요 ㅎ 女子高生＝죠시코세 jk 이렇게 해서 여고생을 jk라 불러요 ㅎㅎ 요즘 한국에서도 줄임말이 정말 많죠.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.