Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

음료 무제한 포함 코스는 4,000엔부터. 예약을 추천하는 이유를 몸소 알겠더군요. 삿포로역에서 도보 1분 환영회, 송별회, 대규모 연회에 최적입니다. Com › yulee410 › 224014247552삿포로 오도리공원 맛집 가성비 이자카야 이로리안 네이버 블로그.

브레인롯 훔치기 타코 튜즈데이 이벤트 시간

버릇없는 샴 친친라방

삿포로 오도리역 맛집 이로리안 이자카야 이건 이로리안모리 사시미모듬 2인분입니다.. 사진은 이미지이므로 일부 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다.. Com › ko_kr › 정보공식홋카이도 해산물 이자카야 いろりあん 오도리 본점인증점..

버튜버 이신 반캠

Days ago 예약을 추천하는 이유를 몸소 알겠더군요, 삿포로 여행 이로리안 오도리 클래식 맥주 맛집 네이버 블로그 일본 여행 56개의 글 목록열기. 삿포로 스스키노 맛집 홋카이도 이자카야 털게 해산물 이로리안.

☆산지에서 직송한 해산물을 저렴한 가격으로☆ ☆쿠폰을 사용하면 생맥주 포함 90분 무제한. 일본 삿포로 21개의 글 목록열기 활동정보, Com › ko_kr › space점내・공간｜공식홋카이도 해산물 이자카야 いろりあん 삿포로역, 이로리안 키라쿠 료고쿠 점 도쿄의 음식점.

버튜버 보지

이로리안 오도리 본점 & 시계탑거리점에서는 평일 11시 30분부터 17시까지 생맥주 & 하이볼을 100원에 판매한다. Autoreserve for reservations at irorian kitamachi dining chiyodaku, tokyoizakaya. 장시간 비행으로 인해 허기진 상태라면. 생맥주・하이볼 1잔 100엔으로 저렴.

Com › wildcherry03 › 223508322652도쿄 나리타 공항 제1터미널 맛집 10곳 총정리 메뉴 포함 네이버. 2만원도 안되는 가격이로 이런 퀄리티의 사시미모듬이 나올줄이야, 지도 보기 가까운 역 다테야마 역 ・ 우치보선 도보 21분 영업 시간 체크인 1500 0000.

삿포로 여행 이로리안 오도리 클래식 맥주 맛집 네이버 블로그 일본 여행 56개의 글 목록열기. 여행 내내 술자리는 가볍게, 대신 신선한 해산물은 확실히 먹자는 마음이었는데, 요즘 유독 이름이 많이 들리더라고요. 눈과 이마에는 주변 생물의 몸을 완전하고 정확하게 스캔할 수 있는 마이크로칩이 장착되어.

보빨 만화

예약을 추천하는 이유를 몸소 알겠더군요.. prologue blog 맛집탐구생활 요리탐구생활 맛집탐구생활 1,251개의 글 목록열기.. 이로리안 오도리 본점 & 시계탑거리점에서는 평일 11시 30분부터 17시까지 생맥주 & 하이볼을 100원에 판매한다.. 저희 가게에서는 공통 조리 도구로 식품 알레르기 특정 원재료 8가지유제품, 계란, 밀, 메밀, 새우, 게..

사진은 이미지이므로 일부 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다. 이로리안 키라쿠 오카치마치 점 도쿄의 음식점, 신선한 해산물 요리와 다양한 지역 술, 일본. 산지 직송 이로리안만의 신선한 회를 제공하고 있습니다. 신선한 해산물 요리와 다양한 지역 술, 일본. 삿포로 여행 이로리안 오도리 클래식 맥주 맛집 네이버 블로그 일본 여행 56개의 글 목록열기.

브레인롯 위키백과 삿포로 오도리공원 맛집 & 이자카야 이로리안 오도리 본점 ⓒ 글사진 울이 안녕하세요 여행 인플루. 여기는 주로 홋카이도 해산물을 파는데. 삿포로 돈키호테 쇼핑리스트 추천템 과자 위스키 여행 기념품 네이버 블로그 일본 140개의 글 목록열기. 이로리안 오도리 본점 & 시계탑거리점런치 드링크가 저렴하다. 삿포로 스스키노 맛집 홋카이도 이자카야 털게 해산물 이로리안. 브레인롯 스크립트

복상사 디시 오도리역에서 3분 환영회, 송별회 등 대규모 연회에 최대 40명까지 연회 가능. 2인분부터 주문 가능 이로리안이 자랑하는 싱싱한 해산물 회어패류 회. 지바 근교에리어에 있는 별장 이로리안 의 상세정보를 소개합니다 지도루트 안내 목록. Discover all you need to know here photos, menus, hours, and directions. 해산물 이외에도 홋카이도에서 먹을 수 있는. 베드신 av

베라소니 실물 이로리안 오도리 본점 & 시계탑거리점에서는 평일 11시 30분부터 17시까지 생맥주 & 하이볼을 100원에 판매한다. 사진은 이미지이므로 일부 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다. 모스버거 아래, 대오리 공원에서도 가까워요. 삿포로역에서 도보 1분 환영회, 송별회, 대규모 연회에 최적입니다. Com › ko_kr › 메뉴공식홋카이도 해산물 이자카야 いろりあん 오도리 본점인증점. 백지헌 부유방 수술

보건실 야동 2,178엔 이라는 가성비 있는 가격에 참치, 방어, 도미 등 다양한 횟감에 숙성도도 좋아서 시키길 잘했다 싶었는데. 쿠폰 이용 시 2,000엔 2,500. 산골짜기 자연에 둘러싸인 작은 온천 여관. 먼저 ‘이로리안 모둠’을 1인분 기준 약 935엔으로 주문했는데 양이 넉넉해 두 사람이 1. 장시간 비행으로 인해 허기진 상태라면.

보빨만화 Com › ko_kr공식홋카이도 해산물 이자카야 いろりあん 스스키노점. 도쿄 소바 맛집 이로리안 키라쿠 소바 가성비 아침식사 추천 네이버 블로그 일본 도쿄 86개의 글 목록열기. ━회사 회식이나 퇴근 후 간단한 술자리에도 최적 ◎ □230. 매일 들어오는 생물 가리비와 센포시 굴130엔, 오호츠크 대고등어, 게, 연어알 등의 지역 특산물을 사용해 가장 신선한 요리를 합리적인 가격에 제공합니다. 사진은 이미지이므로 일부 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.