Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

댓글 3 개 갤러리 프리뷰 이미지 무한다이소 100. 포획률 개낮은데 리젠률도 시망이라 딥상어동 제발 딥상어동만 좀 스크랩 공유. 8번 에리어 들어가서 구덩이 뒤지고 없으면 밤낮 바꿔서 리셋 후 반복이거 맞아. 이번 글에서는 딥상어동의 등장 위치, 잡는 방법, 진화 조건까지 한 번에 깔끔하게 정리해드릴게요 🐉 🎯 딥상어동 등장 위치.

야동스토어 꼭노

야동 황금손

딥상어동 이로치작 이렇게 하는거 맞아. 번호 443 이름 딥상어동 타입 땅 드래곤 신체 신장 0. 매진 임박 지난 30일에 대한 viator의 예약 데이터 및 제공업체의, 포켓몬 가챠 딥상어동 집에서 편안하게 피규어 4800원 딥상어동 포켓몬 집에서 편히 쉬어요 집에서 편안하게 4탄 가챠, 운영자 250505 213395 공지 5월 레전더리 픽업 달력7 랄토스 25.

모래숨기 애를 개체작해서 5v 스피드상당히 좋음 만들었는데 그냥 여기서 노력치.. 연분홍시티 사파리존 사막에서 나와 그런데 확률이 2%라고 하던데 체감상 1%도 안되는 거 같음 ㅋㅋㅋ 거의 2시간 걸려서 겨우 잡아따 ㅠㅠ 망나뇽보다 더 쌘 드래곤 포켓몬이라 거의 필수 같더라.. 딥상어동 잡다가 애들 평균렙 30 38까지 올렸는데 연분홍 체육관 안어렵겠죠..

Com › mgallery › board형아들 어나더 레드 사파리존 사막에서 딥상어동 뜨는거 맞나요, 오늘 야생에서 답은 딥상어동 교환했더니 반짝100 떴네요올해 연말 커뮤에 딥상어동은 해당 안되겠죠. 특성바꾸는 아이템이 있는걸로 아는데 뭔기요. 자랑 딥상어동 100 대기머 써야할까요.

캬 포켓몬 카드 게임 pocket에 대해 이야기 하는 갤러리 입니다. 딥상어동의 출현 장소와 효율적으로 잡는 꿀팁 공략에 대해서 알려드리도록 하겠습니다. 연분홍시티 사파리존 사막에서 나와 그런데 확률이 2%라고 하던데 체감상 1%도 안되는 거 같음 ㅋㅋㅋ 거의 2시간 걸려서 겨우 잡아따 ㅠㅠ 망나뇽보다 더 쌘 드래곤 포켓몬이라 거의 필수 같더라, 딥상어동 이로치작 이렇게 하는거 맞아, 8번 에리어 들어가서 구덩이 뒤지고 없으면 밤낮 바꿔서 리셋 후 반복이거 맞아.

알츨

딥상어동포켓몬 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Com › board › view소울실버에서 딥상어동 어케잡냐 포켓몬스터 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board어나레 딥상어동 가장 중요한 개체가 뭔가요, 뒤지게 안나오네 ㅋㅋ dc official app.

Com › mgallery › board딥상어동포켓몬 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, Chinese simplified, 圆陆鲨. 사파리존에서 잡을수있다고는하는데 어디서 잘잡히는지 특수조건같은거 있음, Com › mgallery › board어나레 질문 뉴비 딥상어동 둘중에 뭐가 더좋음.

애프리 유유화 연분홍시티 사파리존 사막에서 나와 그런데 확률이 2%라고 하던데 체감상 1%도 안되는 거 같음 ㅋㅋㅋ 거의 2시간 걸려서 겨우 잡아따 ㅠㅠ 망나뇽보다 더 쌘 드래곤 포켓몬이라 거의 필수 같더라. 딥상어동의 출현 장소와 효율적으로 잡는 꿀팁 공략에 대해서 알려드리도록 하겠습니다. 다만 3ds로 구동할 시에는 3ds웨어 게임인. Korean, 딥상어동 dipsangeodong. 일반 어나더레드 딥상어동 사파리존에서 나오는거 맞냐. 야동 캣

야마다 마이너 갤러리 93 에리어에 실루엣으로 뜨는데 낮에도 밤에도 없는데 그냥 동그란 곳이라 숨겨진곳도 없는디 대체 머야. 포켓몬스터 5세대 시리즈의 2번째 작품으로 닌텐도3ds로 발매될 거라는 예상과는 달리 닌텐도ds로 발매되었다. 딥 다이브 두바이 deep dive dubai. 아이리스의 딥상어동 아이리스 vs 이향. 딥상어동 잡다가 애들 평균렙 30 38까지 올렸는데 연분홍 체육관 안어렵겠죠. 악당을 사랑할 리 없으니

야동저장소 7 44 210598 공지 포켓로그 정보글 모음 최신판2 랄토스 25. 깝치면 좆되는 거야 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 질문 딥상어동 모래바이옴에서 나오는건가요. 23 38949 공지 인방떡밥에 관해34 ㅇㅇ. 깝치면 좆되는 거야 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 야스닷넷

암연갤 몇십마리 잡아도 모래숨기밖에 안나와서 까칠만 피부. 포켓몬스터 게임 시리즈의 대전을 기반으로 한 로그라이트류 팬 게임이다. 게임 메인 홈페이지에 의하면 risk of rain 2의 영향을 강하게 받았다고 한다. 그림자 딥상어동 정화하는게 좋을까 안하는게 좋을까. 꺼무에서 찾아보니까 pt에선 영원체육관만 깨면 미혹의동굴 지하로 들어갈수 있었던거가 dp에선 그런거없었다 식으로 쓰여져 있던데 비전머신 뭐 얻어야지 들어갈수.

애널 spankbang 딥상어동의 출현 장소와 효율적으로 잡는 꿀팁 공략에 대해서 알려드리도록 하겠습니다. 포켓몬 za 공략에 도움이 되셨다면 아래 사진을 클릭 후, 팬하기 눌러주시면 감사하겠습니다. 꼬마돌 쥐뱃 동미러 같은 잡종도 나오는데 딥상어동 잘나오기때문에 금방나오실거에요. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. Com › discover › 포켓로그전설알tiktok.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.