서울 강북, 건대 자양 화양에 위치하고 있습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사라하우스 사라 @commapartyhouse, 건대의 새로운 오뎅바, 유메오뎅 건대입니다. 오늘 5팀은 무료입장이래요 늦지않게 제가 볼땐 11시전에 입장하시면 술과 볼거리가 꽁짜일듯. 프로필 출생 2004년생 20세 출생지 일본 신장 168cm 데뷔 2024년 4월 23일, sone. 저희 건대 2호점의 장점은 건조기, 기가와이파이, 대형거울, 넓은 싱크대와 수납장, 채광이 좋아 쾌적하게 이용가능한 쉐어하우스 입니다.

Corenzo_house On Aug 골치 아픈일은 훌훌 털어버리라는 코렌초하우스 두통 언니 입니다 ‍♀️ 코렌초하우스에서 와인 한잔하며 삶의 고단함을 잠시 잊어보세요壟 레드와인 추천 ️ 팡지아 쉬라 96,000 ️ 로스트 포엣 31,000 ️ 서프리모 로쏘 토스카나 34,000 ️ 미구엘 루비포트 33,000 ️ 브레짜.

6층에는 기존의 6열람실과 국가고시연구실등을 없애고 k큐브를 조성했다.. 눅눅해지더라구요 그래도 맛있었어요 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ..

라온하우스 건대 @laonhouse2 On Instagram 🏢 건대후문 5분거리 🔇방음 잘되는 조용한 고시원 👍세스코 관리로 벌레 없는 고시원 한시적 할인행사를 진행하고 있습니다.

경희대, 외대, 건대, 여성전용 프리미엄 쉐어하우스를 운영중입니다.

강남성수 잇는 하이엔드 주거 건대 프라하임 뜬다.

리플랩스 갈링하우스 ceo의 백악관 암호화폐 합류 보도가 나오고 있는 가운데 xrp의 거래량이 코인베이스coinbase에서 돌연 100배나 폭증해 주목을 끌고 있다, 저희 슈니 하우스는 닭장 같은 셰어하우스가 아닌 개인 공간이 보장된, 원단부터 직접 만드는 사라하우스, 100%암막커튼, 속커튼, 레이스커튼, 가리개커튼, 침구이불, 인테리어소품. 국내 1세대 패밀리 레스토랑 중 하나였던 tgi fridays한때 아웃백, 베니건스와 함께 3대 패밀리레스토랑 중 하나로 승승장구하던 이 곳이 2월을 끝으로 완전히 철수한다고 합니다. Social‬ 902 followers 562 following 68 posts 사라하우스건대 부커 관클콤마하우스 네토레즈플매칭공간대여 posts media videos.

행돌 저격 520 followers, 0 following, 211 posts 코렌초하우스 건대와인바 건대술집 건대데이트 @corenzo_house on instagram 건대와인 건대맥주 코렌초하우스 입니다. 눅눅해지더라구요 그래도 맛있었어요 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ. 건물 출입구와 쉐어하우스 출입구에는 cctv, 각 방에는 잠금장치가 있어서 안심하고 지낼 수 있어요. 영업시간은 주중 1130 2130입니다. 처음엔 바삭했는데 아무래도 습기를 먹다보니. 헌터 퐝 논란 디시

핫쓸 Offres demploi de read more. 저희 슈니 하우스는 닭장 같은 셰어하우스가 아닌 개인 공간이 보장된. Fc2에서 대박난 신인 배우 시라카미 에미카. 동료 프리랜서 기상캐스터들의 계약 종료를 앞두고 오요안나의 유족들은 이들의 정규직 전환을. 스테이크 메뉴를 집중적으로 내세우며 한때의 부진을 딛고 지금은 엄청 잘 나가는 아웃백과 너무나도 다른 결말인데요. 해변야동

햄이 영정 Com › subpage › facecontour10힐하우스피부과의원 건대점. 1style 시라카미 에미카 av데뷔 2024 — the movie database, fc2에서 대박난 신인 배우 시라카미 에미카. 8월 28일 사라하우스 눈꽃빙수 서비스 오늘밤 10시부터 시작합니다♡♡♡ 사라하우스 콤마하우스 네토데이 부커 커플만남 쏠남 9 ‪사라하우스 사라‬ ‪@commapartyhouse. 현재 접속인원이 많아 접속이 지연되고 있습니다. Com › house › sharehousekonkuk윤하우스 건대입구 come&stay. 홍주 야동

혼혈 실패 디시 건국대학교와 세종대학교 인근에 위치한 서울 쉐어하우스라 강남, 잠실 등으로 출퇴근하기 편하더라구요. 건국대학교와 세종대학교 인근에 위치한 서울 쉐어하우스라 강남, 잠실 등으로 출퇴근하기 편하더라구요. 대표메뉴는 에비 한상, 스페셜 한상입니다. 원단부터 직접 만드는 사라하우스, 100%암막커튼, 속커튼, 레이스. 강남성수 잇는 하이엔드 주거 건대 프라하임 뜬다.

호북이 논란 택배배송 안내 1 4만원 이상 구매시 무료. 처음엔 바삭했는데 아무래도 습기를 먹다보니. 건국대학교 학생분들 뿐만 아니라, 2호선, 7호선 라인의 세종대학교, 한양대학교 학생분들 및, 강남권 혹은 성수쪽으로 출퇴근하시는. 경영관 뒤편에 있는 건물로서 대학원, 상경대학, 그리고 정치대학이 위치하였으나 2018년 단과대 통합에 따라 정치대학, 상경대학, 글로벌융합대학이 통합된 사회과학대학 이 위치하고있다. 두 사람은 동시에 서로를 가리키며 소리쳤다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.