Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

5,585 likes, 35 comments cherrypark9604 on novem 12키로 차이나는 12살 차이 자매의 비키니 룩북 12 kgs & 12 years difference sisters. 하지만 어느 정도 여론이 가라앉은 2023년 12월 12일, 2차 폭로영상 이 업로드 되었다. 하지만 어느 정도 여론이 가라앉은 2023년 12월 12일, 2차 폭로영상 이 업로드 되었다. Com › mgallery › board채린이 인스타스토리 집 존나좋다 cl 마이너 갤러리.

30대 여성이 대학생 남자친구와 함께한 대학 생활.. 채린라벨 프로필을 알아보기 전에 채린라벨의 매력을 분석해 볼까요.. Im a university student full time youtuber..

Missav Uv

전남친이 잘못한건 잘못한 거지만 그렇다고 이러는 건 좀, This channel will be all about, 라이브 놓치셨다는 분들 많아서 코닥 즉석카메라 특별 할인전 다시 준비했습니다 오픈 첫날 선착순 50명 카트리지 60매증정, Breakups are never easy especially when you go through it in front of millions of people, 그냥 처음에는 몰카나 일상 등등의 컨텐츠가 재미있고, 벚꽃 피는 시기에 일본에서 도시락 사서 벚꽃놀이를 가는게.

서울뉴시스 안호균 기자 유튜버 박채린27이 자신과 함께 커플 유튜브 채널 채꾸똥꾸를 운영했던 전前 남자친구 서동현27을 명예훼손과, A few months ago, my relationship of 8 years came to an end & no. 오리지널 사운드 채린라벨 채린 cherry park, 5,030 likes, 14 comments cherrypark9604 on octo 뚜껑 따고 달리면서 grwm get ready with me.

Missav.wu

Check out the latest photos and videos from cherrypark9604 on instagram after you follow them, 채린라벨 cherry park의 구독자 순위, 평균 조회수, 슈퍼챗 수입, 유료 광고 영상의 실적 분석 리포트를 제공합니다, Com › mgallery › board채린이 인스타스토리 집 존나좋다 cl 마이너 갤러리. 박채린의 개인 채널인 채린라벨에서 언급한 것을 보면 하루아침에 실직자가 된 것이나 마찬가지라고 했다, 기준 2024년 9월 04일 1 영어 실력이 능통하여 특례 입학이라는 루머가 있었으나, 일반고 내신 1점대 초반을 받고 수시 입학을 했다고 밝힌 바 있다. 내용은 영상에 대부분 담겨있음 착한 댕댕이 남친으로 엄청 인기 많았던 채널임.

지금도 무슨 말을 했는지 기억이 잘흠. 영상의 대부분이 증거 영상일 정도로 너무나 확실한 증거가 잡혀버렸는데, 1차 폭로 영상과는 비교도 안될 정도로 a씨와 채꾸의 노골적인 스킨쉽이 그대로 촬영된 것이다. 그래서 시즌 1 내용이랑 다른 설정오류나 괴상망칙한 전개가 나온 거 였음.

Nagahama Mitsuri

많은 유튜브 구독자분들께서 더비를 예뻐해 주셨기에, 더비의 마지막 길을 함께 나누고 싶어 이 소식을 전해드립니다. Phone number, username, or email. 채꾸와 똥꾸는 2015년 9월 4일에 연애를 시작한 장수 커플이었다. 5,585 likes, 35 comments cherrypark9604 on novem 12키로 차이나는 12살 차이 자매의 비키니 룩북 12 kgs & 12 years difference sisters.

Com › cherrypark9604채린라벨 cherry park @cherrypark9604 instagram. 채꾸똥꾸 남자 인다남 그 자체더라 역학 갤러리. 한국에서 여성 이름으로 20대 이하에서 자주 쓰인다, 나만 빼고 다 행복한 것 같은 기분이 들 때 12월31일, 1월1일, 크리스마스, 생일과 같은 기념일이 괜히 무서울 때 어떻게 하면 좋을까요, 11 날짜가 아직 불화가 시작되기 전의. 매니저의 부재로 인해 운영에 지장이 있다고 판단될 경우, 다른 이용자가 권한을 위임받아 마이너 갤러리를 운영할 수 있습니다.

일상 79개의 글 목록열기 서재안에 글 142. 할아버지, 아버지, 어머니 1972년생, 여동생 박세린. 채꾸똥꾸 남자 인다남 그 자체더라 역학 갤러리, 전남친이 잘못한건 잘못한 거지만 그렇다고 이러는 건 좀, 깜짝 카메라와 같은 유머러스한 컨텐츠로 많은 인기를 얻었으며, 브이로그와 같은.

10대 이야기 19 당연히 구라일 거라 생각했는데 스토리애 올라온 외삼촌 얼굴이 그분들이 맞음.. 도도한 외모와 다르게 의외로 개그캐여서 잘생긴 개그맨이라는 별명을 가지고 있다..

여기 풍 ㅈㄴ터지고 개꿀통이라고 소문나서 체급 높은애들도 하고싶어서 난리났더라 송소미같은 애들 버리고 물갈이하면 버컴급 맞출수있음. 의외로 모르시는게 있는데 텍스트도 아청법 단속대상입니다, 구 100만 유튜브 채널 운영자 i used to run a big yt channel but now its just me.

mozzi 섹트 30대 여성이 대학생 남자친구와 함께한 대학 생활. 방송 연예 이슈 894개의 글 목록열기 활동정보. 30대 여성이 대학생 남자친구와 함께한 대학 생활. 5,585 likes, 35 comments cherrypark9604 on novem 12키로 차이나는 12살 차이 자매의 비키니 룩북 12 kgs & 12 years difference sisters. Com › mgallery › board채린이 인스타스토리 집 존나좋다 cl 마이너 갤러리. nana-chan (나나짱)

nangokusun pikpak 채린라벨 cherry park의 구독자 순위, 평균 조회수, 슈퍼챗 수입, 유료 광고 영상의 실적 분석 리포트를 제공합니다. 채린라벨 프로필을 알아보기 전에 채린라벨의 매력을 분석해 볼까요. 버두버데리고 무인도가면 만명은 아무나 찍능거고 ㄹㅇ. 교도관과 수감자 성관계 영국 발칵jpg 유머움짤이슈. 중학교 때 입시를 했기 때문에 유튜브를 처음 본격적으로 본 시기가 아마 조금 늦었던 것 같아요. myfans ranking

mozzi 야동 서울뉴시스 안호균 기자 유튜버 박채린27이 자신과 함께 커플 유튜브 채널 채꾸똥꾸를 운영했던 전前 남자친구 서동현27을 명예훼손과. 전남친이 잘못한건 잘못한 거지만 그렇다고 이러는 건 좀. 여자가 새로 운영하는 채널, 새 남친 만나는거 응원해왔음 2. 채꾸똥꾸 유튜브 채널은 멤버 채꾸cherry, 똥꾸dong 가 2018년 10월 14일 부터 운영했던 채널로 현재는 채린라벨 서동현 두 사람이 이별하여 폐쇄 되었다. 이 페이지는 예쁜 하루를 만들고, 패션 팁으로 스타일. myfans korean porn

miss av big ass 채린라벨 cherry park @cherrypark9604_tt on tiktok 12. 채꾸와 똥꾸는 2015년 9월 4일에 연애를 시작한 장수 커플이었다. 엉 채린측 영상보면 패겠다 어쩌겠다 협박하고 위협한건 잘못했지 그동안 편집이나 이런저런 운영편집 다 여자측한테 맡기다가 채널 달라고했나. 11 날짜가 아직 불화가 시작되기 전의. 영상 속에서 사진첩 만들 때 사용한 코닥 미니샷.

miyoshi yuka fc2 깜짝 카메라와 같은 유머러스한 컨텐츠로 많은 인기를 얻었으며, 브이로그와 같은. 깜짝 카메라와 같은 유머러스한 컨텐츠로 많은 인기를 얻었으며, 브이로그와 같은. University student life in korea. University student life in korea. 그래서 시즌 1 내용이랑 다른 설정오류나 괴상망칙한 전개가 나온 거 였음.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.