Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

인터넷상에 고가 매입이나 수출을 유도하는 업체를 주의하셔야 합니다. 재미로 보는 터보 차량의 터보 고장원인 🧩 1. 8ltz 중고차 거래 시 알아야 할 필수 체크리스트 안녕하세요. 크루즈5의 스포티한 외관에 어울리는 박력 있는 달리기를 원한다면 163마력을 내는 2.

Fc2 906103

인터넷상에 고가 매입이나 수출을 유도하는 업체를 주의하셔야 합니다.. 세상에 없는 특별함으로 쉐보레 크루즈cruze5가 찾아왔습니다..

Fc2 3377076

여의도의 서울마리나를 출발해 자유로를 타고 통일동산까지 다녀오는 약 100km의 구간에서 시승차는 11kml의 평균연비를 기록했다, 크루즈가솔린 라세티프리미엄 아베오 트랙스 호환 가능한 쉐보레 순정 18인치 휠타이어 판매합니다. 쿠팡에서 4개 세트 55354565 스로틀 밸브 온도 조절기 본체 히터 커넥터 쉐보레 크루즈소닉뷰익 앙코르569809 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. Com › 305쉐보레 크루즈5 리뷰홀릭.

크루즈가솔린 라세티프리미엄 아베오 트랙스 호환 가능한 쉐보레 순정 18인치 휠타이어 판매합니다. 알페온 임팔라 크루즈크루즈5 all new cruze 트랙스the new 트랙스 트랙스 cuv 트레일블레이저 아베오the new 아베오 스파크 20102015년식 the nextnew spark 말리부 20112015년식 all newthe new malibu 윈스톰윈스톰 maxx 토스카 매그너스 레간자 레조 라세티 누비라 12 브로엄, 8ltz 중고차 거래 시 알아야 할 필수 체크리스트 안녕하세요.

Fc2 김채원

8ltz 중고차 거래 시 알아야 할 필수 체크리스트 안녕하세요.. 재미로 보는 터보 차량의 터보 고장원인 🧩 1..

혁신적인 디자인, 탁월한 주행 성능, 더불어 최고의 안전성을 두루 갖춘 쉐보레 크루즈 세단의 명성에 해치백으로 스포티함과 실용성까지 더한. 동전의 양면처럼 세단의 품격과 해치백의 세련된 디자인을 모두 갖춘 세상에 없는 특별함으로 찾아온 쉐보레 크루즈5의 5가지 매력을 집중 탐구해보았습니다. 그런 탄탄함을 바탕으로 하는 크루즈 시리즈에 해치백 모델이 더해졌고 크루즈5라 불린다. 시보레 크루즈5의 주요 사양, 연비, 안전 기능을 확인하세요. Kr › news › articleview시승기 쉐보레, 크루즈5 1. 하지만 차량을 구매하는 연령층이 점차 낮아지고 스포티한 디자인을 갖고 있는 해치백 스타일이 새로운 평가를 받으며 서서히 각광을 받고 있기 때문에 쉐보레 크루즈 5의 출시 시기는 적절하다는 평가를 받고 있다.

Fc2 4805247

8 휘발유 폐차비는 수도권기준 운행 가능한경우 7580만원 지급합니다, Kr한국 gm chevrolet 순정부품 cmall, 인터넷상에 고가 매입이나 수출을 유도하는 업체를 주의하셔야 합니다. 여의도의 서울마리나를 출발해 자유로를 타고 통일동산까지 다녀오는 약 100km의 구간에서 시승차는 11kml의 평균연비를 기록했다. 그런 탄탄함을 바탕으로 하는 크루즈 시리즈에 해치백 모델이 더해졌고 크루즈5라 불린다.

크루즈5에 장착된 6단 자동변속기는 각각의 엔진과 최적의 조화를 이루고 엔진 성능을 보다 효율적으로 활용해 부드러운 기어 변속을 실현, 탁월한 승차감은 물론, 연비도 향상시켰다, 6 입니다 장착된 중고타이어는 70%이상 남았습니다 대품 조건 가격이며 택배비는 별도입니다. Com › joo773 › 220118650710쉐보레 크루즈5 중고차 가격 시세 1. 크루즈5의 스포티한 외관에 어울리는 박력 있는 달리기를 원한다면 163마력을 내는 2, 동전의 양면처럼 세단의 품격과 해치백의 세련된 디자인을 모두 갖춘 세상에 없는 특별함으로 찾아온 쉐보레 크루즈5의 5가지 매력을 집중 탐구해보았습니다.

8ltz 중고차, 가격 대비 최고의 가치를 찾는 방법, 쿠팡에서 4개 세트 55354565 스로틀 밸브 온도 조절기 본체 히터 커넥터 쉐보레 크루즈소닉뷰익 앙코르569809 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요, 8ltz 중고차, 가격 대비 최고의 가치를 찾는 방법. Com › 305쉐보레 크루즈5 리뷰홀릭, 폐차장에서 무료픽업 해드리고 있으며 오전에 폐차하시면 당일입금 당일말소 가능합니다.

Com › postview쉐보레 크루즈5 1, 재미로 보는 터보 차량의 터보 고장원인 🧩 1. 8 휘발유 폐차비는 수도권기준 운행 가능한경우 7580만원 지급합니다. 그리고 오늘의 주인공인 크루즈5가 추가되었죠.

fc2ai Com › 305쉐보레 크루즈5 리뷰홀릭. 인터넷상에 고가 매입이나 수출을 유도하는 업체를 주의하셔야 합니다. 크루즈5에 장착된 6단 자동변속기는 각각의 엔진과 최적의 조화를 이루고 엔진 성능을 보다 효율적으로 활용해 부드러운 기어 변속을 실현, 탁월한 승차감은 물론, 연비도 향상시켰다. 6 입니다 장착된 중고타이어는 70%이상 남았습니다 대품 조건 가격이며 택배비는 별도입니다. 크루즈가솔린 라세티프리미엄 아베오 트랙스 호환 가능한 쉐보레 순정 18인치 휠타이어 판매합니다. fc2ppv3116506

fc2 피어싱 8ltz 중고차, 가격 대비 최고의 가치를 찾는 방법. 크루즈5의 스포티한 외관에 어울리는 박력 있는 달리기를 원한다면 163마력을 내는 2. 쉐보레 크루즈cruze5가 신차 발표회를 갖고 드디어 국내 시장에 처음 소개되었습니다. Com › 305쉐보레 크루즈5 리뷰홀릭. 여의도의 서울마리나를 출발해 자유로를 타고 통일동산까지 다녀오는 약 100km의 구간에서 시승차는 11kml의 평균연비를 기록했다. fc2-ppv-4314697 0344_t004

fc2ppv4563890 하지만 차량을 구매하는 연령층이 점차 낮아지고 스포티한 디자인을 갖고 있는 해치백 스타일이 새로운 평가를 받으며 서서히 각광을 받고 있기 때문에 쉐보레 크루즈 5의 출시 시기는 적절하다는 평가를 받고 있다. 그리고 오늘의 주인공인 크루즈5가 추가되었죠. 그리고 오늘의 주인공인 크루즈5가 추가되었죠. 8 시승기 또 하나의 크루즈, 크루즈 해치백 1. 그리고 오늘의 주인공인 크루즈5가 추가되었죠. f95 mmd

fc2ppv4230998 6 입니다 장착된 중고타이어는 70%이상 남았습니다 대품 조건 가격이며 택배비는 별도입니다. 동전의 양면처럼 세단의 품격과 해치백의 세련된 디자인을 모두 갖춘 세상에 없는 특별함으로 찾아온 쉐보레 크루즈5의 5가지 매력을 집중 탐구해보았습니다. 혁신적인 디자인, 탁월한 주행 성능, 더불어 최고의 안전성을 두루 갖춘 쉐보레 크루즈 세단의 명성에 해치백으로 스포티함과 실용성까지 더한. Com › joo773 › 220118650710쉐보레 크루즈5 중고차 가격 시세 1. 8 시승기 또 하나의 크루즈, 크루즈 해치백 1.

fc2 단발 쿠팡에서 4개 세트 55354565 스로틀 밸브 온도 조절기 본체 히터 커넥터 쉐보레 크루즈소닉뷰익 앙코르569809 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 혁신적인 디자인, 탁월한 주행 성능, 더불어 최고의 안전성을 두루 갖춘 쉐보레 크루즈 세단의 명성에 해치백으로 스포티함과 실용성까지 더한. 8ltz 중고차, 가격 대비 최고의 가치를 찾는 방법. 크루즈5의 스포티한 외관에 어울리는 박력 있는 달리기를 원한다면 163마력을 내는 2. 시보레 크루즈5의 주요 사양, 연비, 안전 기능을 확인하세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.