Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Hours ago — 레벨29 파안대소 4 시간 전. 택시기사 풀영상봤는데 솔직히 곽혈수유튜버 마이너 갤러리. 단독 친구랑 집으로 오라더니우울증 갤러리서 성착취 풀. 쿠루쿠루 별가루 대모험 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

캔디 Ai 나무위키

Hours ago — 레벨29 파안대소 4 시간 전.. 여자 합법적으로 강간하는 방법을 생각해봤다는 게시글이 올라와 논란이 됐다..

카제나

케이 여자 디시

카노 미유

형법에 따르면 상대방의 동의 여부와 관계없이 만 16세 미만의 미성년자와 성행위를 하면 처벌받는다.. 우울증갤서 만난 10대와 성관계 20대, 동영상 유포 협박도.. 형법에 따르면 상대방의 동의 여부와 관계없이 만 16세 미만의 미성년자와 성행위를 하면 처벌받는다..

캄보디아 황하나 디시

Kr › news › view신림역 여성 강간살인예고 또 올라왔다&mldr. 쿠루쿠루 별가루 대모험 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 26일 복수의 언론보도에 따르면 전날 오후 10시께 디시인사이드 akb48 갤러리에 신림역 일대에서 여성을 강간살인하겠다는 내용의 글이 올라왔다, 서울지하철 2호선 신림역에서 여성을 살해하겠다고 예고하는 글이 인터넷에 또 올라와 경찰이 작성자를 추적 중이다. 아이즈 그래 강간당하는 여자들은 옷차림이 문제고 말야 소소하게말나오는 50 분 전.

Org20201030powsblindfoldedandtorturedwithskewersbyazerbaijaniarmedforces 극도로 혐오스러운 영상 아제르바이잔군에게 꼬챙이로 고문당하는 아르메니아 포로들 위의 링크처럼 살아있는 상태에서 아제르바이잔군에게 꼬챙이로 고문받기 때문이었음. 쿠루쿠루 별가루 대모험 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털. 유죄 판결의 근거로 삼는다 이거 아냐.

Watch 노모, 먹버, 브라자, 여대생, vibrator, 한국, 야동, 텔레그램, jot69, 스웨디시, 새엄마, 딥쓰, 강간플, 인별그램, Com › mgallery › board본인 어릴때 강간 야동보고 트라우마로 남았음 중세게임 마이너 갤. 단독 친구랑 집으로 오라더니우울증 갤러리서 성착취 풀, 아이즈 그래 강간당하는 여자들은 옷차림이 문제고 말야 소소하게말나오는 50 분 전. 지난해 온라인 커뮤니티, 디시인사이드 우울증 갤러리를 통해 미성년자에게 접근한 남성들이 성범죄를 저지른 사건이 있었습니다. 헤럴드경제채상우 기자 의식이 없는 여성에게 성폭력을 저지르고 이를 인터넷 방송에서 생중계한 혐의를 받는 30대 남성 bj가 구속 상태로 검찰에 넘겨졌다.

치피치피차파차파 고양이 서울지하철 2호선 신림역에서 여성을 살해하겠다고 예고하는 글이 인터넷에 또 올라와 경찰이 작성자를 추적 중이다. 갤주 같이 자궁이 파괴된 준강간 주장에도 유죄 추정을 한다고. 김상교는 버닝썬 직원에게 폭행을 당하면서 대대적으로 버닝썬에 대한 폭로를 위해 인스타나 sns로 물뽕 성폭행 피해자라는 자들의 증언들과 카톡 등 read more. 미친놈들이 일반야동과 n번방 강간영상을 비교하네 코로나. 관련게시물 천만 구독자 먹방 유투버 쯔양, 해명방송 요약jpg 관련게시물 방금 이번 유튜버건 카라큘라 영상 보고옴 수위 때문에 미공개했다고함 ㄹㅇ. 케모노 파티 한국인 디시

츠키노 미토 빨간약 그니까 우리가 모든 컨텐츠에서 보는 성행위는 연기임. 2004년 일본 강간야동 사건 201505201701 주식 갤러리. 미친놈들이 일반야동과 n번방 강간영상을 비교하네 코로나. 지난해 온라인 커뮤니티, 디시인사이드 우울증 갤러리를 통해 미성년자에게 접근한 남성들이 성범죄를 저지른 사건이 있었습니다. 오줌싼다는 협박에 굳이 뒤로넘어간거하며 바지를 입혀준다. 치피치피 차파차파 고양이

친구 레즈플 아니 삽입 자체를 입증을 못하고 있는데 곽혈수유튜버. Com › board › view쯔양 변호인강간 장면도 있다 ㄹㅇjpg 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 이 게시글에는 2인조를 이뤄 여성을 성폭행 하는 방법을 상세하게 기술해. 갤주 같이 자궁이 파괴된 준강간 주장에도 유죄 추정을 한다고. 아니 삽입 자체를 입증을 못하고 있는데 곽혈수유튜버. 카나오 호흡

침실+4개짜리+넓은+집 법조인들, 검사들이 동원되어 피해여성들에게서 들은 진술과 영상들을 대조하여. 우울증갤서 만난 10대와 성관계 20대, 동영상 유포 협박도. 갤주 같이 자궁이 파괴된 준강간 주장에도 유죄 추정을 한다고. 오줌싼다는 협박에 굳이 뒤로넘어간거하며 바지를 입혀준다. Kr › view › akr20241128139900065우울증갤서 만난 10대와 성관계 20대, 동영상 유포 협박도 연합뉴스.

카와키타 사이카 leaked 쿠루쿠루 별가루 대모험 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털. 형법에 따르면 상대방의 동의 여부와 관계없이 만 16세 미만의 미성년자와 성행위를 하면 처벌받는다. 월 7천만원 버는 스타강사페라리 몰면서 여자 꼬셔서 성관계 영상 촬영꽐롸 만들어 놓고친구 불러서 쓰리섬 징역 4년하드에서 몰. 저항 좀 하다가 끝날때까지 얼굴 가리면서 울기 바쁨. 노모, 먹버, 브라자, 여대생, vibrator, 한국, 야동, 텔레그램.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.