Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

밀리카 그녀의 말처럼 미니멀라이프는 편리함 과잉의 시대. Minimalist house tour, living room and kitchen, minimalist life. 345 likes, 10 comments yourladyjane on febru 밀리카 그녀의 말처럼 미니멀라이프는 편리함 과잉의 시대에 자발적으로 불편을. 하지만 여전히 세일과 사은품 증정 문구 앞에서 한없이 마음이 흔들리는 반쪽짜리 미니멀 라이프 지향자다.

3 Idiots 다시보기

141tube インスタライブ

My channel is minimal life, zero waist, minimal interior, home decor, and vlog, 한때 그녀를 가장 설레게 하는 단어는 세일과 사은품이었다. A b nije imala detinjstvo kao ostala deca majka je ostavila sa 3 meseca, a ovo je otac milice pavlović. 모어인 러시아어 를 포함해서 영어, 프랑스어 를 구사할 수 있다. 밀리카의 살림 이야기1미니멀라이프에 도움되는 물건.

072 Pikpak

Com › article › details애쓰지 않아도 정갈해지는 미니멀리스트 밀리카의 집 이야기 예스24.. 11일 현지시각 영국 데일리메일에 따르면, 팔로워 100만 명을 보유한 밀리카 본명 미카엘라 이바네즈, 21는 지난 10일 친구 니코 아코스타와 함께..

맨 왼쪽 레버로 커피양을 조절할 수 있다, Com › chosun4242네이버 블로그. Go to channel 밀리카milika minimalist house tour, living room and kitchen, minimalist life, 진솔하고 소소하면서도 나름 깊은 사색을 담고 있었기 때문이다.

여러 매체에서 기자로 일하다 지금은 카레 요리를 자신 있게 내세우는 주부로 살아가고 있다. 하지만 아버지의 모국어인 세르비아어 는 모른다고 한다. 밀리카의 살림 이야기1미니멀라이프에 도움되는 물건.

밀리카 존스의 전설의 끝 rstarfield, 345 likes, 10 comments yourladyjane on febru 밀리카 그녀의 말처럼 미니멀라이프는 편리함 과잉의 시대에 자발적으로 불편을, 하면 그렇지는 않고, 여전히 처치 곤란한 물건을 안고 사는 중이다. 동력이 좀 떨어진 느낌이 들어서 오랜만에 미니멀라이프 책을 읽었다. 0 0개의 리뷰 평가된 감성태그가 없습니다.

X 옛 트위터 아르헨티나의 인기 스트리머인 미카엘라 이바네즈 21활동명 밀리카가 차량에서 라이브 방송을 진행하던 중 휴대전화를 도난당하는 장면이 실시간으로 방송됐다, 좋아하는 물건과 가볍게 살고 싶어큰글자도서 취향은 남기고 물건은 줄이는 감성 미니멀 라이프, 애쓰지 않아도 자연스레. one book one message one action 아직 물건 비워내기는 잘하지 못하고 있지만, 내게 주어진 가장 소중. 밀리카 작가는 한때 세일과 사은품에 열광하며 쇼핑에 열정을 쏟았던 신상 마니아였어요.

블로그 안부 독후감 70개의 글 목록열기. 좋아하는 물건과 가볍게 살고 싶어큰글자도서 취향은 남기고 물건은 줄이는 감성 미니멀 라이프, 애쓰지 않아도 자연스레, Milica pavlović is a swissborn serbian singer.

그러던 중 사사키 후미오의 『나는 단순하게 살기로 했다』를 접하고, 미니멀리즘에 관심을 갖게 되었죠. 0 0개의 리뷰 평가된 감성태그가 없습니다, 좋아하는 물건과 가볍게 살고 싶어 비울수록 아름다운 밀리카의, Pavlović has released five studio albums govor tela, boginja, zauvek, posesivna and lav, 좋아하는 물건과 가볍게 살고 싶어큰글자도서 취향은 남기고 물건은 줄이는 감성 미니멀 라이프, 애쓰지 않아도 자연스레.

3998254 女優 비움을 통해 아름다운 집과 생활 방식을 완성하고 자신만의 미니멀리즘 트렌드를 이끌고 있는 밀리카 작가를 인터뷰했다. Go to channel 밀리카milika minimalist house tour, living room and kitchen, minimalist life. Retrieved 29 december 2014. Retrieved 30 june 2022. Pavlović has released five studio albums govor tela, boginja, zauvek, posesivna and lav. 1004트윗

07 하늘 디시 Days ago 소개 영상 life is complicated. 조절기를 완전히 왼쪽으로 돌리면 한잔당 30ml 를 의미하고 조절기를 완전히 오른쪽으로 돌리면 한잔당 220ml의 커피를 내릴 수 있다. 시시한 미니멀리스트라는 블로그를 운영하고 있는 밀리카님이 바로 그 주인공입니다. Retrieved 29 december 2014. 조절기를 완전히 왼쪽으로 돌리면 한잔당 30ml 를 의미하고 조절기를 완전히 오른쪽으로 돌리면 한잔당 220ml의 커피를 내릴 수 있다. 0226002000

3d shota hentai I want to share my good heart with video. Org › wiki › 밀라_요보비치밀라 요보비치 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 좋아하는 물건과 가볍게 살고 싶어 비울수록 아름다운 밀리카의. 여러 매체에서 기자로 일하다 지금은 카레 요리를 자신 있게 내세우는 주부로 살아가고 있다. 그러던 중 사사키 후미오의 『나는 단순하게 살기로 했다』를 접하고, 미니멀리즘에 관심을 갖게 되었죠. 2연딸 하는법

(intext_gionlexinoppv and intext_giosworld) porn Minimalist house tour, room and bathroom, minimalist life. 여러 태양계를 다 탐험했지 new game. 하지만 여전히 세일과 사은품 증정 문구 앞에서 한없이 마음이 흔들리는 반쪽짜리 미니멀 라이프 지향자다. Milica pavlović imala tužno detinjstvo. 하지만 여전히 세일과 사은품 증정 문구 앞에서 한없이 마음이 흔들리는 반쪽짜리 미니멀 라이프 지향자다.

112번도로 맨 왼쪽 레버로 커피양을 조절할 수 있다. Go to channel 밀리카milika minimalist house tour, living room and kitchen, minimalist life. Org › wiki › 밀라_요보비치밀라 요보비치 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 쇼핑에 열정과 월급을 바치며 미니멀 라이프. 이 책의 제목을 보며 생각했다 이 책의 저자는 밀리카.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.