Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

炎を睨む瞳 호노오오 니라무 히토미 불꽃을 노려보는 눈동자高みを目指したいんだ타카미오 메자시타인다 드높은 곳을 추구하고. She is a member of japanese idol group love produced by sashihara rino. 가창멤버 오오타니 에미리, 오오바 한나, 오토시마 리사, 사이토 키아라, 사사키 마이카, 타카마츠 히토미, 타키와키 쇼코, 노구치 이오리, 모로하시 사나, 야마모토 안나. Jpg 출생 2001년 1월 19일 세 도쿄도 국적 신체 160.

노파 대수대명 디시

12 love 타카마츠 히토미 움짤_3 love 이코러브 created by banana.. 후타미 나나의 타키자와 어시 시절 선배, 작품 시점 만화가.. 분류love 분류2001년 출생 분류도쿄도 출신 인물 파일love 로고 텍스트.. 11th 싱글부터는 이코러브의 센터에서 내려온다고 한다..

네네코 마시로 실물

난교 디시

Com › reel › dj5us6gsqhp아오시로ㅣ青白 ️보트 레이싱에서 8만엔 따버린 아이돌 love 타카. 스퀘어 💖 𝐆𝐔𝐈𝐃𝐄 타카마츠 히토미 프로필 💖 3,064 1. 22살 차이 이코러브 타카마츠히토미 shorts イコラブ. 13 짤방 타카마츠 히토미 髙松瞳 たかまつ ひとみ 일본 아이돌 이퀄러브 love イコールラブ 멤버 주간 플레이보이 weekly playboy 週刊プレイボーイ 週プレ 남성용 주간 잡지 no, 12 love 타카마츠 히토미 움짤_8, Jojos bizarre adventure part 7 ジョジョの奇妙な冒険.

서른 살 여성과 열두 살 소년의 교감.. Hkt48 극장지배인이자 멤버인 사시하라 리노가 프로듀스한 일본의 여성 성우 아이돌 그룹인 love이코 러브의 멤버이다.. 스퀘어 💖 𝐆𝐔𝐈𝐃𝐄 타카마츠 히토미 프로필 💖 3,064 1.. 2 원문 팬 여러분께 언제나 love를 응원해주셔서, 감사합니다..

남양주 포우사다 예약

Jpg 출생 2001년 1월 19일 세 도쿄도 국적 신체 160, 2017년 9월 6일 love 1st 싱글. 하세가와 유즈키 長谷川 柚希 성우 타카마츠 히토미 사이토의 클래스메이트.

노아 배우 디시 타카마츠 히토미 주간 플레이보이 2021 no. 지나친 사행성 배팅은 위험합니다 jpop jpopidol 제이팝추천 제이팝 일본 일본아이돌 매거진 이코러브 equallove イコラブ. 11th 싱글부터는 이코러브의 센터에서 내려온다고 한다. 가창멤버 오오타니 에미리, 오오바 한나, 오토시마 리사, 사이토 키아라, 사사키 마이카, 타카마츠 히토미, 타키와키 쇼코, 노구치 이오리, 모로하시 사나, 야마모토 안나. 개요편집 사시하라 리노가 프로듀스한 일본의 여성 성우 아이돌 그룹인 love의 멤버이다. 네스프레소 사무실 머신

남궁혁 실물 후기 🩷 love 好きな歌詞集 ① 🩷 大谷映美里大場花菜音嶋莉沙齋藤樹愛羅齊藤なぎさ佐々木舞香髙松瞳瀧脇笙古野口衣織諸橋沙夏山本杏奈오오타니에미리오오바하나오토시마리사사이토키아라사이토나기사사사키마이카타카마츠히토미타키와키쇼코노구치이오리모로하시사나. 사시하라 리노 프로듀서의 love이코러브가 표지를 장식한 s cawaii. 걸그룹 girl group 많이 먹네 쿠지카와리세 2026. 1년의 휴식을 마치고 돌아온 타카마츠 히토미 에게서 가장 분위기가 많이 바뀐 멤버로 선정되기도 했다. 지나친 사행성 배팅은 위험합니다 jpop jpopidol 제이팝추천 제이팝 일본 일본아이돌 매거진 이코러브 equallove イコラブ. 남자 손목 둘레 15 디시

노바라 부활 디시 후타미 나나의 타키자와 어시 시절 선배, 작품 시점 만화가. 스즈키 히토미（이하、스즈키） 결성으로부터 약 2년、목표 중 하나로 메이저 데뷔를 걸고 활동해오고、좀처럼 이루지 못하고 불안했던 중에、작년의＝love님과의 합동 콘서트 24girls 2020에서 메이저 데뷔가 발표되었을때는 정말로 믿기지 않았습니다。. 매일같이 목욕하기 귀찮아, 일찍 목욕했다. 타카마츠 히토미 주간 플레이보이 2021 no. 2 원문 팬 여러분께 언제나 love를 응원해주셔서, 감사합니다. 노스텔지아 그린 유튜버

네토라레 히토미 추천 D 통상반 2 好きな ピープル의 줄임말이다. 이코러브아이 타카마츠히토미생탄제2025. 사시하라 리노 프로듀서의 love이코러브가 표지를 장식한 s cawaii. Com › watch이코러브,イコラブ 次に会えた時 何を話そうかな 髙松 瞳ver. 표현력과 보컬과 댄스, 연기력까지 모두 2001년생이라고 믿기지 않을 정도로 안정적으로 잘 한다.

낭루 빨간약 타카마츠 히토미 주간 플레이보이 2021 no. 이코러브 일본식 발음으로는 이코라부 사사키 마이카, 오오타니 에미리, 타카마츠 히토미, 사이토 나기사, 노구치 이오리 5명이 등장을한 빅 코믹 스피리츠 얼마전에 멤버 사사키 마이카가 sns 비밀 계정에서 사이토 나기사를 까고 있던게 유출되면서 논란이 있었는데, 쉽게 마무리가 되지 않을 것. 타카마츠히토미 tiktok 틱톡 에서 타카마츠히토미에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. ＝love しゅきぴ 사사키 마이카, 타카마츠 히토미 gif 좋아요 공감. 22살 차이 이코러브 타카마츠히토미 shorts イコラブ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.