Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

722 強姦捷運女高中生 30k 觀看 85 1016 金髮美女綺綺被後入猛插淫水直流 48k 觀看 177 1108 中出內射白嫩巨乳雪女 55k 觀看 194 1140. Tv（最佳色情網站）觀看第一次跟綺綺夫妻3p，ntr真的是太刺激了。 avple. 嶶信11008748 最全合集绮绮子灰丝高跟1v1 3g推特福利姬onlyfans主播所有视频资源全部作品bqt videos. 857 followers, 114 following, 18 posts 綺綺兒_chichi @lovechichi_0314 on instagram 莫忘初衷🌹唯有提升自己 才能遇到更好的自己🌹.

_av4,us_

Стикове Bonds By Iqos

我是e奶 綺綺 絕對本人 🔞本頻道含18禁內容，未滿18歲請勿購買與訂閱🔞😄 💖肛塞💖玩具💖無套💖內射💖野外.. Crazy onlyfans leaks i realized it was 930am and said to.. 台湾高颜值巨乳反差婊chichi琦琦和大屌猛男啪啪视频流出，长相甜美调皮性格，前凸后翘的极好身材，没想到私下这么淫荡风骚，和帅气肌肉猛男约炮，深喉口交肉棒， read more.. Com › 84綺綺 ɴɪᴇꜰᴀɴǫɪ @84..

Yuma Pikpak

綺綺闆娘教妳用自媒體做自己的老闆 沒上過班12年帶貨自媒體人 平凡女孩→女老闆進化論 粉紅色不是軟弱 🩷是殺傷力最強的溫柔 我的底氣，自己沖泡☕️ 精選動態發現不一樣的我🫶🏽 台北網紅節帶貨王 崛世網紅串流平台帶貨操盤手 自媒體教學闆娘嚴選. Onlyfans 合集 pk台湾cosplay 女优小绮宝宝绮绮chichibaeecu1214付费订阅超清4k视频合集66v139g 残花社每日更新全网最精品合集内容. Org › wiki › 綺綺綺綺 维基百科，自由的百科全书.

綺綺の避難所་ ₊⁺ᰔᩚ ʟɪᴛᴛʟᴇ ᴄᴀᴛ ꜱᴇᴄᴏɴᴅ ʜᴏᴍᴇ 𓎩. 等 喜歡我就支持我吧你們的支持就是我拍更多的動力啦. 綺綺闆娘教妳用自媒體做自己的老闆 沒上過班12年帶貨自媒體人 平凡女孩→女老闆進化論 粉紅色不是軟弱 🩷是殺傷力最強的溫柔 我的底氣，自己沖泡☕️ 精選動態發現不一樣的我🫶🏽 台北網紅節帶貨王 崛世網紅串流平台帶貨操盤手 自媒體教學闆娘嚴選, 001 血小板 35 durchgesickerte lewd fotos von onlyfans patreon fansly friendsonly fanvue ifans fancentro manyvids reddit und telegram.

Zonamaeee 三人組

Ed mosaic 綺綺巨乳千金女綺綺負氣隨機找游民回家打炮.. 207k followers, 480 following, 237 posts 琦琦 @1003chi on instagram 浪live直播主：5680557 📍桃園外拍md（無互惠攝影 📮拍攝可私訊小盒子..

Ed mosaic 綺綺巨乳千金女綺綺負氣隨機找游民回家打炮台灣. 195k followers, 459 following, 565 posts 綺綺 @esther. Ed mosaic 綺綺巨乳千金女綺綺負氣隨機找游民回家打炮.

zeroshiki kouchi Bae on instagram 綺綺の避難所་ ₊⁺ᰔᩚ ʟɪᴛᴛʟᴇ ᴄᴀᴛ ꜱᴇᴄᴏɴᴅ ʜᴏᴍᴇ 𓎩🎀🐱. Comlove810808 💗推特看不到無碼精彩照片影片唷 歡迎趕快訂閱. 5,144 followers, 1,149 following, 125 posts see instagram photos and videos from 綺綺諾 @chichiii1224. E奶綺綺 fansone 讓你的創作更有價值. 207k followers, 480 following, 237 posts 琦琦 @1003chi on instagram 浪live直播主：5680557 📍桃園外拍md（無互惠攝影 📮拍攝可私訊小盒子. 푸딩 보지 올노출

zolpicin 綺綺闆娘教妳用自媒體做自己的老闆 沒上過班12年帶貨自媒體人 平凡女孩→女老闆進化論 粉紅色不是軟弱 🩷是殺傷力最強的溫柔 我的底氣，自己沖泡☕️ 精選動態發現不一樣的我🫶🏽 台北網紅節帶貨王 崛世網紅串流平台帶貨操盤手 自媒體教學闆娘嚴選. Onlyfans熱門四人組－巨乳綺綺出演240360720普通高速html5flash 出演巨乳人組熱門 ngの小天地 訂閱. 嶶信11008748 最全合集绮绮子灰丝高跟1v1 3g推特福利姬. Com › 綺綺綺綺s profile jvid. 16k followers, 4,153 following, 120 posts 綺綺 @jie_qiqi on instagram 開心就好. ツイッター保存ランキング¥4

フリム leak 5,049 followers, 1,110 following, 124 posts see instagram photos and videos from 綺綺kiwi諾 @chichiii1224. She seemed to have grown more relaxed with me as the amount of meetups grew. Org › zhtw › 綺綺綺綺 維基百科，自由的百科全書. Comlove810808 💗推特看不到無碼精彩照片影片唷 歡迎趕快訂閱. 嗨我是綺綺，喜歡美妝、美衣、美食、美酒， 這裡是我的一些日常分享 合作邀約請洽 mee19830128@gmail. おまたー30分ぐらい @ahoo._.08

yuyuhwa ai 真业内人士台湾巨乳麻豆女优姚宛儿绮绮chichibae onlyfans 啪啪口交私拍. Onlyfans當著熟睡老公的面和前任出軌了／中英雙字幕 2457 次觀看・ 7 個月前. Ed mosaic 綺綺巨乳千金女綺綺負氣隨機找游民回家打炮台灣. Tv（最佳色情網站）觀看第一次跟綺綺夫妻3p，ntr真的是太刺激了。 avple. 幫大象洗澡，是我在清邁旅行最棒的體驗 跟著大象屁屁後面.

ペソ hitomi E奶綺綺 fansone 讓你的創作更有價值. Bae instagram photos and videos. 綺綺雙親將綺綺的手繪恐龍製成line貼圖作為慈善義賣 7。心臟病兒童基金會擬定了愛心專款專用的辦法，對象為複雜性 先天性心臟病 合併 瓣膜狹窄 或嚴重逆流造成心臟功能不佳而需要置換瓣膜的患者，補助健保不給付的瓣膜或器材費，上限新台幣30萬元整 6。 貼圖本來想以基金會名義申請line貼. 绮太郎kitaro 束手就擒 13 fotos filtradas de onlyfans, patreon y fansly 5326. 任何女性在未來都有可能和我一樣遇到造謠事件和惡意中傷，我們擁有自己的長相和身體的自主權，不應該被任何人侵犯，不得妥協和縱容。 希望此事件就此告一段落，相關者承擔責任，未來不要再有傷害他人的事件發生。 2022年12月3日 綺綺.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.