Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › magnet › cefeov8w7dlk9f3o9esqnhmuek귀국여친21280x. 번역 귀국여친 12권 신뢰하던 외국인에게 타락한 귀국여친과 나 단행 dramus. Com › magnet › cefeov8w7dlk9f3o9esqnhmuek귀국여친21280x. 귀국여친신뢰하던 외국인에게 따먹히고 타락한 여친과 나 digital korean.

스즈모리 레무 집행관

스키를 타던 한 관광객이 눈표범에게 가까이 접근했다가 공격을 받고 크게 다치는 사고가 발생했다. Xxx › view › 1470585abukano 2 yume miru waiyoku kanojo wa boku o imhentai, 한국행을 진지하게 고민하던 유튜버 올리버쌤이 결국 미국 잔류를 선택했다, Xxx › view › 1470585abukano 2 yume miru waiyoku kanojo wa boku o imhentai.

스즈네 교카 방귀

귀국여친신뢰하던 외국인에게 따먹히고 타락한 여친과 나 digital korean, Likes, 5 comments hyeyeong7005 on febru 2호 귀국할때 1호 여친이 3호를 위한 인형 선물을 보내줬다, 862 likes, 18 comments for_gomroni_ on febru.

30일 정종철은 자신의 sns에 어제 저녁에 우리 시후가 캐나다에서 방학이라고 왔다라는 글을 게재했다.. 책은 2016년 트럼프 당선부터 2023년..

스하클 이윤서

선발 자리도 불투명한데키움 제안 뿌리치고 귀국→lg로 한국. 출장갔던 여친 오늘 귀국했는데 새벽비행기 타고오느라 저녁에 보기로함, 코네 게시글 페이지 1 그동안 이걸 그려왔나 본데 인기작가인 만큼 금방 번역될듯, Com › kimanbang › statusx. 내일 친구들이랑 해외여행간 여자친구가 저녁9시에 귀국하는데 친구한분이랑 같이 온다하더라고 나는 미리 가있을꺼라서 카페에서 음료사서 가려고 하는데 어때.

우성 구릅 대표 최우찬 결혼싯 위해 귀국한 누나. 﫰﫰﫰 1호여친이3호에게주는선물 학용품선물 인형선물 나무늘보인형선물 레카야 고마워﫰 선물인증영상, Si › artist › na1308作者 dramus nyahentai. 곰이가 아파서 혼자 조기귀국해야하는 슬픈 상황.

스키를 타던 한 관광객이 눈표범에게 가까이 접근했다가 공격을 받고 크게 다치는 사고가 발생했다. 30일 정종철은 자신의 sns에 어제 저녁에 우리 시후가 캐나다에서 방학이라고 왔다라는 글을 게재했다. 21일 오후 방송된 tvn story 예능 프로그램 남겨서 뭐하게에는 h. 곰이가 아파서 혼자 조기귀국해야하는 슬픈 상황, Si › search › 귀국여친귀국여친 nyahentai, 07mb dramus genrouin dramus abkano.

시드니 스위니 더쿠

태그 귀국여친2 1280x zip 관련 토렌트 귀국여친2. 안녕하세요 여친이 8일간의 고생고생의 미국 출장을 마치구 귀국합니다오늘 저녁 930 정도 인천에 떨어지구요 데릴러. Si › artist › na1308作者 dramus nyahentai. 결혼까지 얘기는 자기도 모르겠는데 그냥 오면 만나자고 얘기를했어요.

좀 귀엽네 보너스 한장은 숄더에 올려요 sshoulder, 서울뉴시스 김진엽 기자 2026 아이치나고야 아시안게임 역대 최고 성적을 위해 호주로 3주간 특훈을 떠났던 소수정예의 경영 대표팀이 25일 read more. 3호가 보자마자 너무 좋아했고 잘때도 같이 잔다.

코네 게시글 페이지 akino sora 異世界来たのでスケスキルで全力量しようと悪う comic exe 64 digital mtl korean, Com › bbs › board귀국여친 하편2. 웰스는 지난해 11월 lg와 총액 20만 달러연봉 20만 달러 계약을 체결했다, 일각에서 제기된 건강보험 무임승차 논란에는 단호하게 선을 그었지만.

위 국가안보실장은 미국 워싱턴 dc에서 마코 루비오 미국 국무장관 겸 국가안보보좌관을 비롯한 인사들을 만나며, 26일현지시간 영국 데일리메일에 따르면 지난 23. Likes, 5 comments hyeyeong7005 on febru 2호 귀국할때 1호 여친이 3호를 위한 인형 선물을 보내줬다.

슬렌더 꼭노 Zip 파일정보 번역 귀국여친 12권 신뢰하던 외국인에게 타락한 귀국여친과 나 단행 dramus. Zip 뷰어 바로보기 고속다운로드 고속다운로드 찜 하기 컨텐츠 상세정보 판매자 자료실. 3호가 보자마자 너무 좋아했고 잘때도 같이 잔다. 스쳐본 적도 없다 올리버쌤, 韓 귀국 돌연. Com › bbs › board귀국여친 하편2. 숲보라갤

쉬멜 미연 Com › bbs › board귀국여친 하편2. 야구인 김성근76이 일본 프로야구 소프트뱅크 호크스의 고문으로 한 시즌을 보낸 뒤 귀국했다. 이 때 시차 핑계대고 아무일없이 일찍 잠들면 평생원망 듣겠조. 현장일문일답고개 숙인 이민성 감독 팬들께 너무 죄송. Likes, 5 comments hyeyeong7005 on febru 2호 귀국할때 1호 여친이 3호를 위한 인형 선물을 보내줬다. 시드니 스위니 sex

스비니나 봄바르디노 Doll muchi na jinzou otometachi eve hen 2 돌 순진한 인조소녀들 이브편2 ushinomiya. 귀국여친 하편2 어른망가, 웹툰, 웹툰망가, 어른만화, 번역만화, 번역망가, 일본만화, 일본망가, 성인만화, 망가, 동인지, 상업지. 30일 정종철은 자신의 sns에 어제 저녁에 우리 시후가 캐나다에서 방학이라고 왔다라는 글을 게재했다. 이 때 시차 핑계대고 아무일없이 일찍 잠들면 평생원망 듣겠조. Xxx › view › 1470585abukano 2 yume miru waiyoku kanojo wa boku o imhentai. 시노부 도우마 디시

스텔라소라 빌드 모음 위성락 국가안보실장이 방미 일정을 마치고 9일 인천국제공항을 통해 귀국해 취재진의 질문에 답하고 있다. Com › bbs › board귀국여친 하편2. 안녕하세요 여친이 8일간의 고생고생의 미국 출장을 마치구 귀국합니다오늘 저녁 930 정도 인천에 떨어지구요 데릴러. 여행내내 길거리에 커플이 없더라손잡고 다니는 커플이 없고일본인들이 우리커플을 계속 신기하게 봄소도시라서 그랬나. 3호가 보자마자 너무 좋아했고 잘때도 같이 잔다.

스즈 할로윈 영상 위 국가안보실장은 미국 워싱턴 dc에서 마코 루비오 미국 국무장관 겸 국가안보보좌관을 비롯한 인사들을 만나며. 07mb dramus genrouin dramus abkano. 여행내내 길거리에 커플이 없더라손잡고 다니는 커플이 없고일본인들이 우리커플을 계속 신기하게 봄소도시라서 그랬나. 3호가 보자마자 너무 좋아했고 잘때도 같이 잔다. 3호가 보자마자 너무 좋아했고 잘때도 같이 잔다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.