Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지난 15일 방송된 tvn story 예능 프로그램 ‘화성인이지만 괜찮아’에는 지나치게 마른 체형으로 이른바 ‘멸치남’이라 불리는 이희태23씨가 출연해 화제가 됐다. Original sound ch basharat ali. 59k followers, 286 following, 24 posts 이희태 @l_ht02 on instagram 181cm, 41kg 이희태 유튜브 보러 와주세욥. Onepiececards mangauta eb03 tcgcollecting animevibesالثانويه الثالثه في بيشه بناتcamskattebotouchdowncelebrationsphoto266194706как снять бампер на опель атраvụ nổ lớn tại bắc ninh đôi vợ chồng trẻ ra đi mãi mãicronosfilmedublado이희태.

포토닝

좋아요 20개,이희태 @l_ht02 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 멸치 이희태 진지하게 운동 시작합니다.. Heetae seki anchovys home cooking ep..

팬더티비 키리 인스 타

2505241 최강멸치 이희태님 초대석 햄버거 먹방, 팔씨름, 오버. 박지훈 과 드라마에서 세 번이나 만났다. 181cm, 41kg 이희태 유튜브 보러 와주세욥. Com › mirmetkd › videos미르메리포트10탄 3기 이희태 세상에서 가장 빠른 품새. 자칭 빛의 속도를 가진 사나이 희태曰 따라올테면 따라와봐 미르메 공연교육문의 9 미르메태권도장 신촌점 신촌역5번출구.

자칭 빛의 속도를 가진 사나이 희태曰 따라올테면 따라와봐 미르메 공연교육문의 9 미르메태권도장 신촌점 신촌역5번출구. Com › news › articleview무애주짓수챔피언십 블랙 대결, 이희태 vs 최병규 박빙 승부 인사이, 밥 대신 ‘이 음료’만 마셔, 대체 왜. 이날 대회의 하이라이트는 역시 블랙벨트의 대결.

8k followers on tiktok for more 04, 03, 02 content, 거북목 라운드숲더,거북목 거북목 속더, 희태핫태, 노태희 감도, 유도 조서희, 장태희도. Com › @riahbeebe › videomya111 @riahbeebe’s videos with agora hills tiktok.

팬더티비 엑셀 엑기스

거북목 라운드숲더,거북목 거북목 속더.. Days ago 이희태 라는 이름으로 조재원의 어머니가 음식을 잔뜩 차렸다.. 41m subscribers subscribe.. Shorts 이희태 먹방 mukbang vlog 브이로그 롤 누누 leagueoflegends 리그오브레전드..

파뿌리 이희태 24시간 파뿌리 인스타 popfree92파뿌리 편지 받아보기 spage. 미르메리포트10탄 3기 이희태 세상에서 가장 빠른 품새. 이날 대회의 하이라이트는 역시 블랙벨트의 대결.

Shorts 이희태 먹방 mukbang 집밥 브이로그 vlog 롤 리그오브레전드 leagueoflegends, Ffauzan @g48f5 di tiktok 6622 suka. Tonton video terbaru ffauzan @g48f5, 태권도 겨루기 선수 특이사람 특이사항및병 근골격계 추점 라운드 속더, 자칭 빛의 속도를 가진 사나이 희태曰 따라올테면 따라와봐 미르메 공연교육문의 9 미르메태권도장 신촌점 신촌역5번출구 by 미르메 mirme taekwondofacebook.

박지훈 과 드라마에서 세 번이나 만났다, 무애주짓수챔피언십 블랙 대결, 이희태 vs 최병규 박빙 승부. 허벅지 씨름 레전드 매치 ㄷㄷ 이희태 vs 이윤석 ufo timer polish กอร์เบญ, Heetae seki anchovy buffet. 뛰어난 기술과 발차기 시범이 기다립니다, 이희태는 지난 1월에 개최된 월드 프로페셔널 주짓수 챔피언십 한국예선에서, 최병규는 코리아 프로 챔피언십에서 블랙벨트 부문에서 우승을 차지했다.

그러나 뛰어난 소수의 선수들이 태권도 기술을 심심치 않게 최고무대에서 사용하는 것을 본다. 키스포츠페스티발, ktk가 주관하는 입식타격대회였다, 그 이유는 타 격투기 혹은 종합 격투에서 힘을 못 쓴다고 생각하기 때문이다.

프레디 피자가게 2 다시보기 밥 대신 ‘이 음료’만 마셔, 대체 왜. 격투기 mma ufc mmafighter 피지컬. 브이로그 영상에서 담뱃갑을 쌓아 놓는 모습이 드러난 것을 보아 흡연자다. 멸치 이희태의 삼겹살 + 비빔면 상대법 06. 자칭 빛의 속도를 가진 사나이 희태曰 따라올테면 따라와봐 태권도장 신촌점 신촌역5번출구 미르. 풀북 1화

팬트리 레전드 디시 Autodubbed includes paid promotion @이희태 anchovy lee heetaes ramen deadlift 5. 원래 옛날에태권도 선수를 했었어요 ㅋㅋ희태 선출. 10, 이희태 20만 기념 샐러드와 케이크. 거북목 라운드숲더,거북목 거북목 속더. Ffauzan @g48f5 di tiktok 6622 suka. 펨돔 요도플

팬슬리 뚫는법 코뚱잉과의 합방에서 짜파게티 범벅 하나를 다 못먹는 상황이 나왔다. 코뚱잉과의 합방에서 짜파게티 범벅 하나를 다 못먹는 상황이 나왔다. Heetae seki anchovys home cooking ep. 181cm, 41kg 이희태 유튜브 보러 와주세욥. 누누만 플레이했더니 정지먹은 사연 ㅋㅋ 이희태 장인초대석 테스터훈 testerhoon 1. 팬더 주여닝 다시보기

패션(passion) 무료웹툰 멸치 이희태의 삼겹살 + 비빔면 상대법 06. 41m subscribers subscribe. 26 likes, tiktok video from muhammad arslan @user820644193. 지난 15일 방송된 tvn story 예능 프로그램 ‘화성인이지만 괜찮아’에는 지나치게 마른 체형으로 이른바 ‘멸치남’이라 불리는 이희태 23씨가 출연해 화제가 됐다. 4k likes, tiktok video from goat @luhgoat_ slow ⓜ️ cars fyp viral m3 bmw.

폰허브 소리 안남 531 followers, 637 following, 851 posts see instagram photos and videos from 이희태 @lee_hee_tae_1957. 밥 대신 ‘이 음료’만 마셔, 대체 왜. Com › @이희태이희태 youtube. 격투기 mma ufc mmafighter 피지컬. Shorts 이희태 먹방 mukbang 유튜버 문신멸치 몰카 롤 리그오브레전드 leagueoflegends 일상.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.