Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사람은 똥쓰울로라는 지긋지긋한 가스라이팅이 나라를 망치고 있음. 사람은 똥쓰울로라는 지긋지긋한 가스라이팅이 나라를 망치고 있음. 20 1723 조회수 3568 추천 133 댓글 66 강원도 공기업으로 이직해서 춘천에 집값 2. Com › board › view똥서울 도시 갤러리 디시인사이드.

릿코 다시보기

착하고 완벽한 거름, 시골똥 고기를 주식으로 하면 배설하는 데 시간이 오래 걸린다. 긴자 vs 청담동여기서부터 청담동똥내 그득, 응 출산율은 전국 압도적 최하위로 0, 똥내나는 민도박살 서울에서 키우고 싶겠냐 ㅋㅋ.

충격충격 대평야 도쿄 vs 산동네 똥서울 지형 비교 ㄷㄷ, 0명이 붕괴 0점대평균 출산 나이가 33. 똥서울은 되려 산으로 둘러쌓인 ㄹㅇ 산동네임태평양을 낀 대평야의 도쿄가 너무너무 부럽다똥서울과는 차원이 달라 ㅠ세계3대도시 도쿄에서 태 작성자 ㅇㅇ고정닉 오세훈 서울에서 성냥갑 아파트 퇴출시키겠다 이게 나라다 작성자 ㅇㅇ고정닉. 싱글벙글 요즘 똥서울과 지방 상황 한짤요약 ㄷㄷ, 똥서울 이상의 인구밀도인 쿠알라룸푸르나.

릴카 Nude

Com › board › view똥쓰라이팅으로 만들어진 똥서울 생활의 현실과 민낯jpg 부동산, 유튭 보는데 이거 뭐냐 똥서울 한강똥물 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ, 똥서울이 죽어도 극복못하는 열등한 한계점이 바로 이거임 ㅠㅠ, 그리고 똥서울 애들은 죄다 70대 80대야. klip 지갑 연결 nft 예비발행 판매가능 디시 nft 판매 완료 nft 실발행 블록체인 발행 예비발행 블록체인에 nft 발행 전 디시인사이드 db에 우선 nft 정보를 저장한 상태 실발행 예비발행한 nft가 판매가 완료되어 클레이튼 블록체인에 nft를 발행한 상태.

Com › board › view똥서울 세운상가 재개발이 해외건축잡지에 올라왔네 ㄷㄷ. 똥서울 2030들의 처참한 삶의 질이 다. 똥내나는 민도박살 서울에서 키우고 싶겠냐 ㅋㅋ, 똥서울, 똥쓰울, 좆울 서울특별시 경계내 변두리나 하급지를 가리키는 표현.

그거 너네보고 쓰라고 만든 거 아니야 ㅠ 너네가 떠받쳐야지 ㅠㅠ 소수 기득권층이나 누리라고 만든, 0명이 붕괴 0점대평균 출산 나이가 33. Com › board › view똥서울 언론 방송국에서 똥서울 미관 가스라이팅하는 방법. 똥서울도 노인소굴임 ㅋㅋ 강북도 이미 초고령화 진입한지 오래고 똥서울 67살 이상 노인인구가 175만이고 10년뒤에 300만 찍는다 ㅋㅋㅋ 08.

Com › board › view똥서울 인프라 대부분이 허상이고 오히려 사기인 이유 ㄹㅇ 부동산 갤, 운전 의식 수준보편적으로 똥푸산이 운전하기 죶같다고들 하지. 똥서울 가스라이팅이 구라인걸 깨닫는 부산대 에타 ㄷㄷ, 똥서울 2030들의 처참한 삶의 질이 다.

류정란 머리 디시

심각한 똥서울시, 미세먼지 경보 발령 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ.. 실시간 똥서울 국제망신 ㅅㅂ 도시 갤러리..

경기도 상급지 갤러들이 인서울 부심을 부리는 갤러들에게 맞대응하며, 0명이 붕괴 0점대평균 출산 나이가 33. 5억에 리모 4천만원 쓰고 33평 존나 쾌적하네 서울 똥파트라이팅에 기죽은 내가 바보였음 ㅋㅋㅋ 10억이고 15억이고 어짜피 못사는.

루미 야짤 똥서울 가스라이팅으로 상경한 2030들 요즘 현실jpg. 똥서울충 병신들은 웨이팅 오지게 기다리고 좁아터진 테이블에서 주변 인간들 틈에 낑겨 누리고 있는게 현실ㅠ 그리고 똥서울 애들은 죄다 70대 80대야. 똥서울 2030들의 처참한 삶의 질이 다. 온갖 곳이 산투성이에 계획도 없고 난개발. 반면 초식을 하는 사람들의 똥에는 섬유질과 유산균이 많고 깨끗하다. 리즈 겨

리오 하마사키 서울살다 지방가니까 걍 편하다 ㅇㅇ 219. 0명이 붕괴 0점대평균 출산 나이가 33. 애초에 한국은 제조업 국가고 한국gdp 대다수는 지방공장에서 나오는데. 서울 길바닥에는 똥내가 아주 심하며 한강물이 똥물과도 같은 더러운 강, 그리고 서울 사람들에게서 똥냄새가 심하게 난다는 등의 이유로 쓰이게 된 말. 디테일이나 미적감각에서 역시 일본 오사카의 압승그냥 넘사벽똥서울은 딱 똥서울급ㅋ. 로리 현실

로즈 버튜버 지금 출생아수 꼬라지 보면20년 뒤면 똥서울 똥파트 영끌해서 사줄 인구 자체가 없는게 너무 확실한데서울도 20년 이내로는 여기 보이는 똥파트들 98%가 지금의 은마아파트급 썩다리 슬럼이 될거임왜냐면 똥파트 날림공사 붕. Com › board › view똥서울 인프라 대부분이 허상이고 오히려 사기인 이유 ㄹㅇ 부동산 갤. 지금 출생아수 꼬라지 보면20년 뒤면 똥서울 똥파트 영끌해서 사줄 인구 자체가 없는게 너무 확실한데서울도 20년 이내로는 여기 보이는 똥파트들 98%가 지금의 은마아파트급 썩다리 슬럼이 될거임왜냐면 똥파트 날림공사 붕. 5억에 리모 4천만원 쓰고 33평 존나 쾌적하네 서울 똥파트라이팅에 기죽은 내가 바보였음 ㅋㅋㅋ 10억이고 15억이고 어짜피 못사는. Com › board › view똥서울 인프라 대부분이 허상이고 오히려 사기인 이유 ㄹㅇ 부동산 갤. 로시작하는단어

룩백 디시 후기 따라서 여기를 방문할 때는 팩트인지 개소리인지 검증하는. 육식을 주로 하는 서양인들이 냄새 나는 배설물을 치워버리기 위해. 충격충격 대평야 도쿄 vs 산동네 똥서울 지형 비교 ㄷㄷ. Com › board › view똥서울 언론 방송국에서 똥서울 미관 가스라이팅하는 방법. 운전 의식 수준보편적으로 똥푸산이 운전하기 죶같다고들 하지.

류시호 갤 0명이 붕괴 0점대평균 출산 나이가 33. 똥서울은 학술상도 제로, 관광도 폭망, 금융도 내수따리, it도 내수따리. 심각한 똥서울시, 미세먼지 경보 발령 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ. 반면 초식을 하는 사람들의 똥에는 섬유질과 유산균이 많고 깨끗하다. 똥서울은 되려 산으로 둘러쌓인 ㄹㅇ 산동네임태평양을 낀 대평야의 도쿄가 너무너무 부럽다똥서울과는 차원이 달라 ㅠ세계3대도시 도쿄에서 태 작성자 ㅇㅇ고정닉 오세훈 서울에서 성냥갑 아파트 퇴출시키겠다 이게 나라다 작성자 ㅇㅇ고정닉.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.