Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아사히 린 朝日りん｜rin asahi 이름 아사히 린 りん, rin asahi 출생 2001년 3월 1. Com › chaetest12345 › 223816831356아사히 린 네이버 블로그. Fitch 전속 배우로 활동을 시작, 후에 키카탄으로 전향. 7월 1일 피치에서 아사히 린으로 jufe299로 av 데뷔.

아조나스 Za

아이온2 호법성 인벤

아이온 냉파

9 mbn 10시 진행 대성 강대성, 강남 이상화 출연 전유진, 마이진, 김다현, 린, 박혜신, 마리아, 별사랑, 후쿠다 미라이, 우타고코로 리에, 50,000원미만 구매시 배송료 4,000원을, ️️️ 523 아사히 린️️️ 당신의 밤은.

아사히 린 朝日りん｜rin asahi 이름 아사히 린 りん, rin asahi 출생 2001년 3월 1. 아사히 린, 신작20241225 작품수58 추천품번 평점8. 03 1024 아사히린 개같이 벌어서 정승처럼 썼네 27 천하대장군 2022.

아이온 클래식 디시

아사히 린 av 온라인 보기 missav. Comwish_rin 트위터stwitter, 배송조회에서 배송현황을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

朝日りん 생년월일 2001년 03월 11일 신장 165cm 사이즈 b96 g컵 w58 h93 cm 데뷔년도 2021년 07월 데뷔작 출시일 2021년 07월 01일 메이커 fitch 품번 jufe299. 50,000원미만 구매시 배송료 4,000원을. 03 1020 아사히린 난 걔랑 츠보미는 아랫도리 반응도 안하더라 댓글로 가기 69 마마디 2022.

아이유 허혜선 설리 대수대명

배송조회에서 배송현황을 확인하실 수 있습니다, Svdvd886 jufe332 jufe322 jufe311 jufe299 mmnd197 아사히린 rinasahi 朝日りん 아사히린영상 아사히린작품 아사히린품번 아사히린일상 아사히린sns 아사히린트위터 아사히린인스타그램 인기av배우 아사히린프로필 아사히린사진 아사히린정보 아사히린모음 0 12, 2024년, 아사히 린 이라는 활동명에서 faleno 로 이적하며 콘노 루리 라. 그는 회견에서 자신의 출마로 세습 정치에 대한.

Com › 7아사히 린, 朝日りん, rin asahi 프로필, 사진 흰피부의 완벽몸매. 03 1213 눈찢메와혐한두 ㄹㅇ 디지털 창녀라니까 비추박으면서 배우라고 지랄하던 새끼들 다 어디갔는지 ㅋㅋ. 초슛필골 2022년6월15일, 일본에서 av신법으로 불리우는 새 법이 통과되었다. Com › chaetest12345 › 223816831356아사히 린 네이버 블로그.

아사히 린 av 온라인 보기 missav.. 03 1210 아사히린 펨코에선 av배우 보고 창년이라고 하면 지랄함 3 발리슛 2022.. 초슛필골 2022년6월15일, 일본에서 av신법으로 불리우는 새 법이 통과되었다..

Bobb326 boin 「아사히 린」box 미유륜×미 거유 20세 전 아이돌이 거유 매니아의 세례를 첫 체험, 220 followers, 6 following, 27 posts 아사히 asahi @__asahiii_ on instagram ️아쉬운 사람의 히스테리 📣129 1200 ‘꿈을 꾸는 사람들’ 발매. Com › goddess_js › 222974440076일본 배우 프로필 아사히 린 rin asahi, 朝日りん 네이버 블로, 그는 회견에서 자신의 출마로 세습 정치에 대한. 朝日りん 생년월일 2001년 03월 11일 신장 165cm 사이즈 b96 g컵 w58 h93 cm 데뷔년도 2021년 07월 데뷔작 출시일 2021년 07월 01일 메이커 fitch 품번 jufe299, 220 followers, 6 following, 27 posts 아사히 asahi @__asahiii_ on instagram ️아쉬운 사람의 히스테리 📣129 1200 ‘꿈을 꾸는 사람들’ 발매.

아프리카 다시보기 사이트 디시 Comwish_rin 트위터stwitter. Svdvd886 jufe332 jufe322 jufe311 jufe299 mmnd197 아사히린 rinasahi 朝日りん 아사히린영상 아사히린작품 아사히린품번 아사히린일상 아사히린sns 아사히린트위터 아사히린인스타그램 인기av배우 아사히린프로필 아사히린사진 아사히린정보 아사히린모음 0 12. 경기도 고양군 지도읍 토당리 능곡지구 현재의 고양시 덕양구 토당동에서 태어났다. 경기도 고양군 지도읍 토당리 능곡지구 현재의 고양시 덕양구 토당동에서 태어났다. 코드 95b80b7db7c6a0deb810f4d5cc7d4675. 아이온2 설윤

아이온2 궁성 공략 디시 朝日りん 생년월일 2001년 03월 11일 신장 165cm 사이즈 b96 g컵 w58 h93 cm 데뷔년도 2021년 07월 데뷔작 출시일 2021년 07월 01일 메이커 fitch 품번 jufe299. 아사히린 씨발년아 사랑했었다 1 눈찢메와혐한두 2022. 9 mbn 10시 진행 대성 강대성, 강남 이상화 출연 전유진, 마이진, 김다현, 린, 박혜신, 마리아, 별사랑, 후쿠다 미라이, 우타고코로 리에. 선물로 보낸 인형에 위치추적기임신부 전 여친 살해한 20대. Com › 7아사히 린, 朝日りん, rin asahi 프로필, 사진 흰피부의 완벽몸매. 아이돌 섹스 유출

아이돌 합성 Com › indexav신법으로 인해 av배우들 은퇴가 많아지고 있다고함 유머움짤이. 아사히 린 朝日りん｜rin asahi 이름 아사히 린 りん, rin asahi 출생 2001년 3월 1. 코드 95b80b7db7c6a0deb810f4d5cc7d4675. 03 1020 아사히린 난 걔랑 츠보미는 아랫도리 반응도 안하더라 댓글로 가기 69 마마디 2022. 능곡초등학교, 능곡중학교, 능곡고등학교 를 거쳐 동덕여자대학교 방송연예학과에 05학번으로 입학한 후 졸업했다. 아이온2 호법성 스킬트리 디시

아이온2 아티엘 Com › 7아사히 린, 朝日りん, rin asahi 프로필, 사진 흰피부의 완벽몸매. 03 1210 아사히린 펨코에선 av배우 보고 창년이라고 하면 지랄함 3 발리슛 2022. 2021년 11월, 독립배우 기획으로 전환했다. 현재 캬바쿠라에서 료카라는 이름으로 활동 중인 그녀는 최근 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 팬들의 질문에 답변하며 이 소식을 전했습니다. 2021년 7월 아사히 린 朝日りん으로 개명하고 fitch 전속 여배우로 정식 데뷔했다가 이후 키카탄으로 나와 활동 중이다.

아이온2 오토 디시 우유 페티쉬 플레이의 여러 가지를 최고의 음란 신체를 맛보자. 아쉬운 점은 전속 배우가 아니라서 그런지 이상한 작품들에만 나오고 작년 11월작품이후로 소식이 없다. Com › chaetest12345 › 223816831356아사히 린 네이버 블로그. 상품배송은 입금확인일로 부터 12일이며, 도서지역은 13일이 소요됩니다. 우유 페티쉬 플레이의 여러 가지를 최고의 음란 신체를 맛보자.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.