Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

We care about your beauty & health sano healthcare. 처음 방문하는 분들도 편안하게 이용할 수 있는 환경으로, 방일 외국인 고객에게도 높은 평가를 받고 있습니다. 🏢 주식회사 사노헬스케어는 도매 및 소매업 기반 미용기기 기업입니다. Mongeune op ap 사노코 처음입는 옷인데 어때요.

이아롱 인스타 라이브

다국어 대응이 가능한 스태프가 상주하고 있어 언어의 장벽 없이 원활하게 안내받을 수 있습니다.. 처음 방문하는 분들도 편안하게 이용할 수 있는 환경으로, 방일 외국인 고객에게도 높은 평가를 받고 있습니다.. 브레이브걸스의 예상치 못한 인기로 연일 역주행송에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다..

이수진 디시

이직로그 채린

이안 ㅗㅜㅑ

또한, 더 싸기도 해 아마도 시설을 유지할 필요가 없기 때문일 거야, Com › sano_healthcare사노 헬스 케어 @sano_healthcare instagram photos and videos. 풍속가에 접수처를 마련해놓은 가게도 있습니다만, 예전에.

Likes, 2 comments sanotherapy on aug 사노테라피 공식유투브 안녕하세요.. 사노헬스케어 에서 미세전류 관리가 진행되는 장비로, 배에 깔고 누워서 손이 닿으면 전기 저항이 몸 속으로 흐르면서 속근육까지 꼼꼼하게 케어받을 수 있는.. ㈜사노헬스케어의 사노 액티브 sano active effect 몸이 먼저 느끼는 변화 무너진 신체밸런스의 균형을 맞춰주고 피부탄력 개선을 유도합니다.. 10월 30일에 저희 사노헬스케어에서 2021 sano 시..

이이경 트위터

Com › j_pinky › 223184164661청담테라피샵 사노헬스케어 청담점 생체전류를 이용한 전신관리. Com › sano1129 › 222428692010사노테라피 장비소개 ㈜사노헬스케어 네이버 블로그, Com ⓒ sano healthcare co. 여기를 지나니 창밖으로 아울렛이 보이기 시작하더라고요. 사노테라피 파트너데이는 사노헬스케어가 용인fc센터와 협업하여 u18 선수분들께 사노 에너지테라피로 지속적인 케어를 해드리는 날인데요, 안녕하세요 사노헬스케어사노테라피입니다.

이주은 ㅗㅜ ㅑ Oneesanselect은 는 외국인 여행자도 안심하고 이용할 수 있는 패션헬스 하코헤루입니다. 가게명 oerunohinkakukurabuasshu. 2,214 followers, 3,829 following, 118 posts 사노테라피_official @sano_therapy on instagram 최고의 마스터들이 전하는 손끝의 짜릿함. Com › sano1129 › 222428692010사노테라피 장비소개 ㈜사노헬스케어 네이버 블로그. 만화 캐릭터의 패션 분석과 어울리는 브랜드입니다 ㅎ 개인적인 주관을 담아 작성하게 된 포스팅이구요 재미로 간단하게 봐주셨으면 좋겠습니다 첫번째 주인공으로는 현재 가장 인기있는 만화책. 이상원 성형

이케부쿠로 풍속 2,214 followers, 3,829 following, 118 posts 사노테라피_official @sano_therapy on instagram 최고의 마스터들이 전하는 손끝의 짜릿함. 저번 파트너데이에 이어 선수분들의 불편한 부분들을 ebta협회분들의 손끝으로 꼼꼼하게 케어해 드렸답니다. 주사노 헬스케어 0220396603 서울특별시 강서구 양천로 401 강서한강자이타워 a동 304호 sanotherapy sanoactive 사노테라피 사노 sano 사노기기소개 사노장비소개 사노액티브소개 사노액티브 사노헬스케어기기 사노액티브장비 ＃サノセラピー ＃オールーンワンセラピー electrotherapy energytherapy. Junahim church 주내힘교회 주일예배 ​ 본 교회단체는 ccli 로부터 교회 저작권 라이선스와 스트리밍 라이선스를 취득하였습니다. 패션헬스는 보통 20,000엔 정도인데, 데리헤루는 그 절반 가격으로 이용할 수. 이이경 폭로자 신상

이시카와 미오 치지직 메디포스트, 일본 신생아 제대혈 보관 서비스. 주 사노 헬스케어 대표 전진욱 서울시 강서구 양천로 401, a동 304호 강서한강자이타워 사업자등록번호 52 contact. 전류 자극을 통해 생체 에너지를 높여 신체를 활성화시키고 무너진 피부 및 체형밸런스의 균형을 되찾아주는 사노테라피는, 시술 받는 사람의 만족도가. 손끝으로 전해지는 전류와 따스한 온기가 당신의 몸과 마음에 건강한 아름다움을 선사합니다. Izumisano에 있는 이즈미사노 컨트리클럽 근처 숙소. 이연우 온팬

이안 슴 표기에 대해서, 후생 노동성, 어린이 가정청 및 문부 과학성으로부터 별첨대로 통지 read more. 🏢 주식회사 사노헬스케어는 도매 및 소매업 기반 미용기기 기업입니다. 사실 역주행송이란 말만 없었을 뿐, 세월을 거스르듯 오랜 시간이 read more. 고속도로를 1시간 달려 사노 톨게이트를 통과해요. 사노라면롤린힘든 세월 버텨온 대중들 공감.

인간극장 Introducing a new concept of electrotherapy 사노테라피는 생체전류를 이용한 새로운 개념의 테라피 시스템입니다. Com 주 사노 헬스케어 대표 전진욱 서울시 강서구 양천로 401, a동 304호 강서한강자이타워 사업자등록번호 52 contact. 메디포스트대표 양윤선는 1일 서울 서초동 본사에서 일본 사노사社와 업무 제휴 협약식을 갖고, 일본에서 제대혈은행 사업을 시작한다고 3일 밝혔다. 안산그리너스 fc, 용인시 축구센터 등과 mou 협약을 맺은 사노헬스케어는 소속 선수들이 최상의 컨디션에서 경기에 임할 수 있도록 사노테라피 건강관리 서비스를 제공하고. 브레이브걸스의 예상치 못한 인기로 연일 역주행송에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.