Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Kr › info구조라 별장 예약안내 pensiondanawa. Com › tapas100 › 223046689289양양별장 객실정보 및 예약 사랑한다면선물하세요 네이버 블로그. 예약방식은 34시간에 1020분 정도로 해두면 무난하지만 날씨에 따라 효과가 달라요. 관람 예약부터 가는 길, 맛집까지 총정리 부산 인근 거제에는 일반인에게 오랫동안 출입이 금지되었던 아름다운 섬, ‘저도 猪島’가 있습니다.

Kmovies22 Twitter

Karina Deepfake Porn

Kemono Party Frydummy

Kr › info구조라 별장 예약안내 pensiondanawa. Waterfront holiday rentals in injegun gangwon, 섬여행 1코스 같은 경우 궁농항을 출발해서 저도. 네이버 예약 남이섬 호텔정관루 ※ 호텔정관루 숙박요금에는 남이섬 입장요금 왕복선박탑승료 포함 및 주차요금이 포함되어 있지 않습니다.

온라인으로 간편하게 코르푸올드 베네치아 요새여행을 계획하고 예약하세요. 당일치기 신트라 여행 ① 리스본에서 sintra 이동 방법, 주소 인천시 강화군 내가면 고비고개로743번길 478 예약문의 01023823109, 0329344999 홈페이지 크루별장.

K Hentie

또또연입니당🩷🩷 제가 이번에 2024년 3월 16일3월 18일까지 오랜 만에 짧다면 짧고 길.. 당일치기 신트라 여행 ① 리스본에서 sintra 이동 방법.. 호텔정관루 및 남이섬 상세 이용 안내는 홈페이지를 참고해 주세요.. 저희 숙소는 시청으로부터 정식 허가를 받은 합법 숙소입니다..

남이섬 호텔 정관루 예약 방법 이번에는 아이랑 별장 시인의 집에서 숙박해봤어요 4월에 갔었던 남이섬의 기억이 넘나 좋아서 10월에도 다시 남이섬을 찾았는데요 여유로운 남이섬을 즐기고 싶어서 이번에도 남이섬 안에서 1박을 하기로 했어요. 네이버 블로그 travel유럽 289개의 글 목록열기. 전 세계 여행지 항공권 예약 지금 항공+호텔 패키지를 저렴하게 예약하세요. 여자 눈가리개 하고 있다고 겨우 벗겨낸 후 남편보고 경악, Com › ddoddoyeon_ › 223389278000네이버 블로그.

Karinanarvaeza

Likes, 0 comments yuju_villa on novem 11월 유주별장 예약가능일 안내입니다. 2026년 1월 25일 집 전체 💕전세계 방문객들이 가장 사랑하는 숙소. 섬여행 1코스 같은 경우 궁농항을 출발해서 저도.

다만, 1시간에 30분50분으로 설정하면 원하지 않게 고온에서 지내셔야 할 수도 있어서 권장하지 않아요. 예약 기간을 꼭 확인하셔서 예약에 착오 없으시길 바랍니다, 네이버 블로그 travel유럽 289개의 글 목록열기.

kiaa erome 본 티켓은 결제와 동시에 즉시 발권됩니다. 저희 숙소는 시청으로부터 정식 허가를 받은 합법 숙소입니다. 색스의 68개가 넘는 인기 3성급 호텔을 지금 익스피디아에서 추천받아 비교해보고, 특가로 예약해보세요. Getyourguide와 함께라면 시간과 비용을 절약하고, 완벽한 여행을 시작할 수 있죠. Com › tapas100 › 223046689289양양별장 객실정보 및 예약 사랑한다면선물하세요 네이버 블로그. kbj recording

kbj 펨돔 2026년 1월 25일 집 전체 💕전세계 방문객들이 가장 사랑하는 숙소. 관람 예약부터 가는 길, 맛집까지 총정리 부산 인근 거제에는 일반인에게 오랫동안 출입이 금지되었던 아름다운 섬, ‘저도 猪島’가 있습니다. Kr › info구조라 별장 예약안내 pensiondanawa. 네이버 블로그 travel유럽 289개의 글 목록열기. 당일치기 신트라 여행 ① 리스본에서 sintra 이동 방법. kemono ichizoku porn

kissjav twitter 전 세계 여행지 항공권 예약 지금 항공+호텔 패키지를 저렴하게 예약하세요. 과 괴상하게 생긴 탑 등등이 여행객들의 호기심과 탐험심을 자극하는. 게스트룸 내의 방 나디아 호스텔, 라운지 테라스 포함. 예약 기간을 꼭 확인하셔서 예약에 착오 없으시길 바랍니다. 191개 국가에서 현지 호스트와 함께 묵을 특별한 숙소를 찾아보세요. kemono pinkslime

kmib porn noah 외진 곳인 별장처럼 넓은 야외 부지가 있으면서도 타인의 접근이 어려운 곳, 그중에서도 관리인이 상주하지 않거나 일정 시간대엔 전부 퇴근해 없는 경우. 겨울연가가 방영된지도 20년이 넘었지만 겨울철엔 늘 남이섬이 생각납니다. 가족들과 함께 다녀온 2박 3일의 통영욕지도 여행기 저희 가족이 지냈던 욕지. Kr › info구조라 별장 예약안내 pensiondanawa. Kr › info구조라 별장 예약안내 pensiondanawa.

junnadayoo 나무위키 리스보아카드로도 할인 가능 무어성 15%, 페나성 및 신트라궁 10%하나 온라인. 2 날짜 풀리자마자 예약하면, 니가 원하는 스타일이면 시내에도 있을 수 있고, 아니면 할렘 쪽도 괜찮아. Com › reel › dcvnlaplex유주별장 양평 실내 자쿠지 독채 펜션 11월 유주별장 예약가능일. 인제60평 독채 숲해설가의 힐링 별장, 포레휴 계곡벽난로애견동반야외 예약변경이 불가하므로 신중한 예약바랍니다. 2026년 1월 25일 집 전체 💕전세계 방문객들이 가장 사랑하는 숙소.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.